A mathematical formalism for natural selection with arbitrary spatial and genetic structure
We define a general class of models representing natural selection between two alleles. The population size and spatial structure are arbitrary, but fixed. Genetics can be haploid, diploid, or otherwise; reproduction can be asexual or sexual. Biological events (e.g. births, deaths, mating, dispersal) depend in arbitrary fashion on the current population state. Our formalism is based on the idea of genetic sites. Each genetic site resides at a particular locus and houses a single allele. Each individual contains a number of sites equal to its ploidy (one for haploids, two for diploids, etc.). Selection occurs via replacement events, in which alleles in some sites are replaced by copies of others. Replacement events depend stochastically on the population state, leading to a Markov chain representation of natural selection. Within this formalism, we define reproductive value, fitness, neutral drift, and fixation probability, and prove relationships among them. We identify four criteria for evaluating which allele is selected and show that these become equivalent in the limit of low mutation. We then formalize the method of weak selection. The power of our formalism is illustrated with applications to evolutionary games on graphs and to selection in a haplodiploid population.
KeywordsEvolution Population genetics Fixation probability Spatial structure Weak selection Markov chain
Mathematics Subject Classification91A22 92D15
BA is supported by National Science Foundation Award #DMS-1715315. AM is supported by the Office of Naval Research, Grant N00014-16-1-2914. We thank Martin A. Nowak for helpful discussions.
- Benaïm M, Schreiber SJ (2018) Persistence and extinction for stochastic ecological difference equations with feedbacks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.07888
- Chen YT, McAvoy A, Nowak MA (2016) Fixation probabilities for any configuration of two strategies on regular graphs. Sci Rep 6(39):181Google Scholar
- Cox JT, Durrett R, Perkins EA (2013) Voter model perturbations and reaction diffusion equations. Asterisque 349Google Scholar
- Diekmann O, Gyllenberg M, Metz J (2007) Physiologically structured population models: towards a general mathematical theory. In: Takeuchi Y, Iwasa Y, Sato K (eds) Mathematics for ecology and environmental sciences, biological and medical physics, biomedical engineering. Springer, Berlin, pp 5–20Google Scholar
- Haldane J (1924) A mathematical theory of natural and artificial selection. Part I. Trans Camb Philos Soc 23:19–41Google Scholar
- Ibsen-Jensen R, Chatterjee K, Nowak MA (2015) Computational complexity of ecological and evolutionary spatial dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112(51):15,636–15,641Google Scholar
- Malécot G (1948) Les Mathématiques de l’Hérédité. Masson et Cie, ParisGoogle Scholar
- McAvoy A, Adlam B, Allen B, Nowak MA (2018a) Stationary frequencies and mixing times for neutral drift processes with spatial structure. Proc Ro Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2018.0238
- Metz JAJ, de Roos AM (1992) The role of physiologically structured population models within a general individual-based modelling perspective. In: DeAngelis DL, Gross LA, Hallam TG (eds) Individual-based models and approaches in ecology: populations, communities, and ecosystems. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 88–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Metz JAJ, Geritz SAH, Meszéna G, Jacobs FA, van Heerwaarden JS (1996) Adaptive dynamics, a geometrical study of the consequences of nearly faithful reproduction. In: van Strien SJ, Lunel SMV (eds) Stochastic and spatial structures of dynamical systems. KNAW Verhandelingen, Afd., Amsterdam, pp 183–231zbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Williams GC (1966) Adaptation and natural selection: a critique of some current evolutionary thought. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar