Journal of Mathematical Biology

, Volume 75, Issue 6–7, pp 1669–1692 | Cite as

Reconstruction of LGT networks from tri-LGT-nets

Article
  • 152 Downloads

Abstract

Phylogenetic networks have gained attention from the scientific community due to the evidence of the existence of evolutionary events that cannot be represented using trees. A variant of phylogenetic networks, called LGT networks, models specifically lateral gene transfer events, which cannot be properly represented with generic phylogenetic networks. In this paper we treat the problem of the reconstruction of LGT networks from substructures induced by three leaves, which we call tri-LGT-nets. We first restrict ourselves to a class of LGT networks that are both mathematically treatable and biologically significant, called BAN-LGT networks. Then, we study the decomposition of such networks in subnetworks with three leaves and ask whether or not this decomposition determines the network. The answer to this question is negative, but if we further impose time-consistency (species involved in a later gene transfer must coexist) the answer is affirmative, up to some redundancy that can never be recovered but is fully characterized.

Keywords

Phylogenetic networks Lateral gene transfers Triplets 

Mathematics Subject Classification

05C85 92D15 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for many comments and suggestions that helped to improve the quality of the manuscript.

References

  1. Baroni M, Semple C, Steel M (2005) A framework for representing reticulate evolution. Ann Comb 8(4):391–408MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Baroni M, Semple C, Steel M (2006) Hybrids in real time. Syst Biol 55(1):46–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cardona G, Llabrés M, Rosselló F, Valiente G (2009a) Metrics for phylogenetic networks i: generalizations of the robinson-foulds metric. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform (TCBB) 6(1):46–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cardona G, Pons JC, Rosselló F (2015) A reconstruction problem for a class of phylogenetic networks with lateral gene transfers. Algorithms Mol Biol 10(1):28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cardona G, Rossello F, Valiente G (2009b) Comparison of tree-child phylogenetic networks. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 6(4):552–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Doolittle WF, Bapteste E (2007) Pattern pluralism and the tree of life hypothesis. Proc Nat Acad Sci 104(7):2043–2049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Felsenstein J (2004) Inferring phylogenies, vol 2. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  8. Francis AR, Steel M (2015) Which phylogenetic networks are merely trees with additional arcs? Syst Biol 64(5):768–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gambette P, Huber KT (2012) On encodings of phylogenetic networks of bounded level. J Math Biol 65(1):157–180MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Habib M, To T-H (2012) Constructing a minimum phylogenetic network from a dense triplet set. J Bioinform Comput Biol 10(05):1250013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hao W, Golding G (2004) Patterns of bacterial gene movement. Mol Biol Evol 21(7):1294–1307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hotopp JCD (2011) Horizontal gene transfer between bacteria and animals. Trends Genet 27(4):157–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huber KT, Moulton V (2013) Encoding and constructing 1-nested phylogenetic networks with trinets. Algorithmica 66(3):714–738MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Huber KT, van Iersel L, Kelk S, Suchecki R (2011) A practical algorithm for reconstructing level-1 phylogenetic networks. IEEE/ACM Trans Computat Biol Bioinform (TCBB) 8(3):635–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huber KT, van Iersel L, Moulton V, Scornavacca C, Wu T (2017) Reconstructing Phylogenetic level-1 networks from nondense binet and trinet sets. Algorithmica 77(1):173–200MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Huber KT, van Iersel L, Moulton V, Wu T (2015) How much information is needed to infer reticulate evolutionary histories? Syst Biol 64(1):102–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huson DH, Rupp R, Scornavacca C (2010) Phylogenetic networks: concepts, algorithms and applications. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huson DH, Scornavacca C (2011) A survey of combinatorial methods for phylogenetic networks. Genome Biol Evol 3:23–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kelk S, van Iersel L, Lekic N, Linz S, Scornavacca C, Stougie L (2012) Cycle killer.. qu’est-ce que c’est? on the comparative approximability of hybridization number and directed feedback vertex set. SIAM J Discret Math 26(4):1635–1656MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Martin DP, Murrell B, Golden M, Khoosal A, Muhire B (2015) RDP4: detection and analysis of recombination patterns in virus genomes. Virus Evol 1(1):vev003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Martin WF (2011) Early evolution without a tree of life. Biol Direct 6:36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moret BM, Nakhleh L, Warnow T, Linder CR, Tholse A, Padolina A, Sun J, Timme R (2004) Phylogenetic networks: modeling, reconstructibility, and accuracy. IEEE/ACM Trans Computat Biol Bioinform (TCBB) 1(1):13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morrison DA (2011) Introduction to phylogenetic networks. RJR Productions, StamfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Nikolaidis N, Doran N, Cosgrove DJ (2014) Plant expansins in bacteria and fungi: evolution by horizontal gene transfer and independent domain fusion. Mol Biol Evol 31(2):376–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oldman J, Wu T, van Iersel L, Moulton V (2016) TriLoNet: piecing together small networks to reconstruct reticulate evolutionary histories. Mol Biol Evol 33(8):2151–2162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Polz MF, Alm EJ, Hanage WP (2013) Horizontal gene transfer and the evolution of bacterial and archaeal population structure. Trends Genet 29(3):170–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Seehausen O, Terai Y, Magalhaes IS, Carleton KL, Mrosso HD, Miyagi R, van der Sluijs I, Schneider MV, Maan ME, Tachida H et al (2008) Speciation through sensory drive in cichlid fish. Nature 455(7213):620–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Semple C, Steel MA (2003) Phylogenetics. Oxford University Press on Demand, OxfordMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. van Iersel L, Kelk S (2011) Constructing the simplest possible phylogenetic network from triplets. Algorithmica (New York) 60(2):207–235MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. van Iersel L, Kelk S, Rupp R, Huson D (2010) Phylogenetic networks do not need to be complex: using fewer reticulations to represent conflicting clusters. Bioinformatics 26(12):i124–i131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. van Iersel L, Moulton V (2014) Trinets encode tree-child and level-2 phylogenetic networks. J Math Biol 68(7):1707–1729MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Willson S (2011) Regular networks can be uniquely constructed from their trees. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform (TCBB) 8(3):785–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and Computer ScienceUniversity of the Balearic IslandsPalmaSpain

Personalised recommendations