# Towards quantitative root hydraulic phenotyping: novel mathematical functions to calculate plant-scale hydraulic parameters from root system functional and structural traits

- 1k Downloads
- 7 Citations

## Abstract

Predicting root water uptake and plant transpiration is crucial for managing plant irrigation and developing drought-tolerant root system ideotypes (i.e. ideal root systems). Today, three-dimensional structural functional models exist, which allows solving the water flow equation in the soil and in the root systems under transient conditions and in heterogeneous soils. Yet, these models rely on the full representation of the three-dimensional distribution of the root hydraulic properties, which is not always easy to access. Recently, new models able to represent this complex system without the full knowledge of the plant 3D hydraulic architecture and with a limited number of parameters have been developed. However, the estimation of the macroscopic parameters a priori still requires a numerical model and the knowledge of the full three-dimensional hydraulic architecture. The objective of this study is to provide analytical mathematical models to estimate the values of these parameters as a function of local plant general features, like the distance between laterals, the number of primaries or the ratio of radial to axial root conductances. Such functions would allow one to characterize the behaviour of a root system (as characterized by its macroscopic parameters) directly from averaged plant root traits, thereby opening new possibilities for developing quantitative ideotypes, by linking plant scale parameters to mean functional or structural properties. With its simple form, the proposed model offers the chance to perform sensitivity and optimization analyses as presented in this study.

## Keywords

Root water uptake Plant-scale parameters Hydraulic architecture Water flow equation in root## Abbreviations

- RWU
Root water uptake

- RS
Root system

- HA
Hydraulic architecture

- SUF
Standard uptake fraction

- SUD
Standard uptake density

## Mathematics Subject Classification

92C80 92B05## 1 Introduction

Plant transpiration is the process by which water molecules are evaporated from leaf surfaces. When stomatas open, carbon dioxide is taken up while water vapour is lost at a certain rate function of the atmospheric evaporative demand, leaf properties and stomatal aperture (Lobet et al. 2014).

Root systems (RS) play a key role by providing water from the soil, which sustains the transpiration flux (McElrone et al. 2013) and by sending hydraulic and hormonal signals to regulate stomata conductance (Tardieu et al. 2015). Location of roots within the soil, connection between root segments but also root and soil hydraulic resistance distribution determine the ability of a root system to acquire and transport water. Thus, not only the RS architecture (de Dorlodot et al. 2007) but also the RS hydraulics (Vadez 2014) influence the ability of plants to extract and transport soil water to the leaves. It has been shown that RS architecture and hydraulics are determinant under drought (Leitner et al. 2014b; Tardieu 2012). Therefore, researchers have attempted to search for ideal structural and functional characteristics of root systems, which would help plant RS to explore soil and to provide water to the plant in an optimal way (Wasson et al. 2012; Lynch 2013). High plant conductivity, steep secondary roots, long roots, high radial conductivity, low xylem have for instance been proposed as potential optimal features (Comas et al. 2013). However, these features may not be optimal under all climatic and environmental conditions (Tardieu 2012; Leitner et al. 2014b). In addition, quantitative approaches are missing to properly evaluate how these proposed features would affect the plant ability to extract water.

Since the first studies of Dixon and Joly (1895) more than a century ago, the understanding of the sap ascent in plant has evolved until the establishment of the cohesion-tension theory (Steudle 2001; Wheeler and Stroock 2008). The water transport in xylem vessels is a mainly passive process opposed to the potential hydraulic gradient between the soil and the atmosphere and the continuity of the water phase is ensured (as long as cavitation does not appear) by tension-cohesion forces. An old and widely accepted model for plant water flow uses the Ohm law analogy, where the plant system is represented as a network of connected hydraulic resistances (van den Honert 1948). The Hydraulic architecture (HA) has been proposed by Zimmermann (1978) as a conceptual framework to represent roots as a connected network, whose structure (connection between root segments) and function (radial and axial hydraulic resistances) define its properties. Although this concept was initially meant to describe above ground parts of the plant and in particular the sensitivity of xylem to embolism (Tyree and Ewers 1991) later the notion was more specifically developed for RS (Root hydraulic architecture or RHA) by Doussan et al. (1998a) and by Couvreur et al. (2012), amongst others (see for example the work of Cowan 1965).

Several mathematical solutions of the flow equation in a complex connected system have been developed through years. Landsberg and Fowkes (1978) developed the first analytical solution for water flow in a homogeneous single root. They also proposed a solution when regularly spaced laterals are included on a hydraulically-homogeneous root branch. However, the solution does not apply to the case of hydraulic properties varying along the root and an exact solution of the second case can be found without incorporating the laterals on the primary branch. Biondini (2008) and Roose and Schnepf (2008) also developed analytical solutions for continuous root (i.e. without segmenting the roots into small homogeneous root parts called segments) including second order roots (and higher) but they did not consider the resistance to flow along the main axis between the laterals and/or they did not include possible changes of hydraulic properties along a root branch.

Recently, Couvreur et al. (2012) developed a RS-scale model for solving water flow in RHA. In this approach, RHA is characterized with only three macroscopic (i.e. plant-scale) parameters: (1) the global hydraulic conductance of the root system (\(\mathrm {K_{rs} \,[L^3 T^{-1} P^{-1}]}\)), (2) the Standard Uptake Fractions (\(\mathrm {SUF [-]}\)), or relative distribution of water uptake under uniform soil water potential, and (3) the compensatory root water uptake conductance (\(\mathrm {K_{comp} \, [L^3 T^{-1} P^{-1}]}\)). The parameter \(\mathrm {K_{rs}}\) defines how easily water flows through a root system. The larger the conductance, the lower the pressure drop inside the root system. The \(\mathrm {SUF}\) provides weighing factors to obtain the equivalent soil water potential sensed by the plant (called \(\mathrm {H_{s,eq} \, [P]}\)) by averaging the distributed soil water potentials. The third plant-scale parameter \(\mathrm {K_{comp}}\) controls the redistribution of root water uptake (RWU) in non-uniform soil water potential conditions (i.e. process known as compensation, or compensatory RWU, see Jarvis 2011 or Javaux et al. 2013). The advantage of this approach is that it does not rely on an explicit consideration of the RS architecture and reduces the RHA characteristric parameters to three, while keeping an exact representation of the water flow physical principles (Couvreur et al. 2012). Moreover, these macroscopic root system hydraulic parameters can be used in coupled soil–plant models (such as models of de Jong van Lier et al. 2013 or Javaux et al. 2008) to simulate the water uptake for contrasted soil and climate conditions. Leitner et al. (2014b) indeed showed that optimal root traits depend on soil and climate properties.

In a context of global climate change and expected water limitations on crop yield (Cattivelli et al. 2008), identifying key factors affecting crop water productivity is essential (Volpe et al. 2013; Passioura 2006). Root systems, with their large natural variability seem to be good candidates for crop plant improvement. Developing plant-scale indices, which quantify the ability of a RS to extract water from heterogeneous soil is a key step in the search of optimal plants under dry conditions. However, no quantitative model exists yet to link the RS hydraulic parameters to local root functional and structural properties (i.e. root angle, distance between laterals, local hydraulic resistances, etc.). Our objective is thus to provide novel mathematical models linking local root structural and functional traits to plant-scale properties of RS: \(\mathrm {K_{rs}}\), \(\mathrm {SUF}\) and \(\mathrm {K_{comp}}\). In this study, we will focus on the first two parameters after demonstrating that \(\mathrm {K_{comp}}\) is equal to \(\mathrm {K_{rs}}\) under certain conditions.

To achieve this goal, the following methodology will be followed: (1) to review, adapt existing or develop new mathematical solutions of the flow equations explicitly accounting for specific local root traits in simple RS with increasing degrees of complexity; (2) to extract the upscaled hydraulic parameters from these solutions in order to (3) investigate how root traits impact them.

The structure of the paper is the following: first we develop the theory of our model with mathematical tools applied to RS with increasing complexity. We then illustrate the model functioning with two applications: the first one uses the model to derive root hydraulic parameters from experimental data; the second is theoretical and analyses the sensitivity of the macroscopic parameters of a mature maize RS to local traits. Finally, we demonstrate and discuss the application of the model in quantitative phenotyping.

## 2 Theory

### 2.1 Root water flow model

#### 2.1.1 Water flow equation

Two local hydraulic properties characterize any root or root zone: its hydraulic radial conductivity \(\mathrm {k_r \, \left[ L T^{-1}P^{-1}\right] }\) and its axial intrinsic conductance \(\mathrm {k_x \, \left[ L^4 T^{-1} P^{-1}\right] }\). Here and everywhere we assume a unique value for root radial conductivity in both directions (in- and outflows).

#### 2.1.2 Macroscopic parameters

### 2.2 Single homogeneous root

Let us consider a simple RS made of a single root branch with uniform hydraulic properties. The RS has a radius \(\mathrm {r}\) and a length \(\mathrm {l_{root} \, [L]}\) and is oriented along the z-axis (a list of the principal symbols can be found in “Appendix 1”). \(\mathrm {z}\) is defined as the position along the root, zero at the root tip, positive towards the plant collar by convention. Let us assume that the water potential at the soil–root interface \(\mathrm {H_{sr}(z) \, [P]}\) is uniform and equal to \(\mathrm {H_{soil} \, [P]}\). The xylem water potential in the root collar is called \(\mathrm {H_{collar} \, [P]}\). This situation is shown in Fig. 1 (left).

This asymptotic value of conductance implies that for given local hydraulic properties and water potential difference between the soil and the root collar, there is a maximal flow rate. This suggests that there is an optimal length beyond which the root conductance does not increase significantly. At that point plant marginal interest in investing structural carbon in the root for water acquisition is not significant.

Centre and right panels of Fig. 1 illustrate the sensitivity of the global conductance of the uniform root to changes in axial and radial conductivities. In these subplots Eqs. (8), (10) and (11) are plotted as blue solid lines, dark/grey linear relations and dark/grey dashed-dotted horizontal lines, respectively. The dark arrows indicate the decreasing trend of \(\mathrm {K_{rs}}\) curves when decreasing root hydraulic conductivities (resp. axial and radial conductivities in central and right subplots).

Figure 3 illustrates the uptake rate relative density in standard conditions and its sensitivity to \(\mathrm {l_{root}}\) and \(\mathrm {\tau }\), respectively. In the left panel, the lighter blues solid line are smaller roots. The gray dashed lines are the harmonic approximations predicted from Eq. (13). The smaller the \(\tau l\) product the better the approximation. In the right subplot \(\mathrm {\tau }\) intrinsic property of the root is gradually increased. The smaller the radial to axial conductivity ratio the more homogeneous the water uptake. Indeed the axial resistance is less and less limiting so that the radial barrier becomes progressively the highest resistance to root water flow. The area below the curve always remains equal to 1.

To summarize this first theoretical section, from the physical equations of water flow in a root cylinder with uniform hydraulic properties (solutions of Landsberg and Fowkes 1978), we derived analytical expressions for the macroscopic root hydraulic parameters of Couvreur et al. (2012) model in terms of local hydraulic properties. These plant-scale parameters depend on both hydraulic (axial and radial conductivities) and geometrical traits (length, radius). Particularly, two local hydraulic properties determine the macroscopic parameters: \(\mathrm {\kappa }\) provides the asymptotic root conductance, and \(\mathrm {\tau }\) determines how quickly a growing root approaches its asymptotic conductance, and how uniform is the water uptake profile along the root. These local properties do not depend on the boundary conditions. They are intrinsic root properties, just like the macroscopic parameters.

### 2.3 Root with heterogeneous properties

We consider now a root cylinder made of several homogeneous root zones. Each zone is characterized by its own hydraulic radial conductivity \(\mathrm {k_{r,i}}\) and axial conductance \(\mathrm {k_{x,i}}\) with i varying from one to N the total zone number. To calculate the macroscopic parameters of the entire root we first focus on one of the root zones called generically hereafter i. For all zones except the apical one, the upstream root part can be seen as an initial conductance attached to the considered zone. The root zone under focus has a root length \(\mathrm {l_{root,i}}\) and the position \(\mathrm {z_i \, [L]}\) along the root portion varies between 0 and \(\mathrm {l_{root,i}}\). We define the upstream or distal end of the root zone as the position closest to the root tip (\(\mathrm {z = 0}\)) and the downstream or proximal end as the end of the root zone (\(\mathrm {z = l_{root,i}}\)).

Figure 4(top) shows a RS made of three zones, each of them having homogeneous hydraulic properties. In the left subplot the root global conductance is shown as a function of the total root length (dark blue solid line). The \(\mathrm {K_{rs}}\) can be calculated at each location z between the tip and \(\mathrm {l_{root}}\), and will depend on the hydraulic properties of the root segment and zones between 0 and the location z. How the \(\mathrm {K_{rs}}\) will change with z will depend on the values of the root properties along the root branch. If we change each of the radial or axial hydraulic conductivities separately, \(\mathrm {K_{rs}}\) will change accordingly in a different way, as showed in Fig. 4. The sensitivity of this macroscopic parameter to the different radial conductivities when increasing the local hydraulic traits by 25% are plotted (light blue solid lines). In the right subplot we present the same sensitivity analysis of this root conductance to each local hydraulic axial conductances. The reference values are the different hydraulic conductivity plateau obtained by Doussan et al. (1998b) for a maize lateral root.

Figure 5 shows SUD in the case of heterogeneous root properties and its sensitivity. Here again we consider a three-zoned root. In subplots b and c, the uptake fraction density is plotted as a function of the position along the root (blue solid line). We clearly see the locations of the transition between zones. By definition the integral remains equal to unity. The sensitivity of the normalized uptake is plotted when local radial conductivity of each zone is respectively increased by 25% as compared to the generic hydraulic properties obtained by Doussan et al. (1998b) (light blue dashed, dotted and dash-dotted lines, from tip to collar zones). In the right subplot the impact of an increase of the axial conductances of each zone is shown (light blue dashed, dotted and dash-dotted lines from tip to collar zones).

### 2.4 Root system with laterals

#### 2.4.1 Discrete model

#### 2.4.2 Discretized uniform root branch

It is worth mentioning that for \(\mathrm {l_{seg}} \rightarrow 0\), \(\mathrm {\kappa _{+}} \rightarrow \kappa \) and \(\mathrm {K_{rs,n}} \rightarrow K_{rs} (nl_{seg})\). This implies that the size of the segments that lead to a certain accuracy of the discrete solution can be derived.

A finite difference solution of \(\mathrm {SUF}\) for a homogeneous root can be found in function of the \(\mathrm {\frac{k_r}{k_x}}\) ratio (and on the considered segment length \(\mathrm {l_{seg}}\)). It leads to an equation equivalent to the one found in the continuous solution section when the segment length is small enough. Details of the mathematical development are given in “Appendix 5”.

#### 2.4.3 Discretized root branch with laterals

In addition this model can be coupled with the previous one (root with heterogeneous properties) to take into account the differentiated zones close to the root tip or at the root basis.

The continuous lines give the conductance of a branched root when \(\mathrm {K_{lat}}\) increases and \(\mathrm {d_{inter}}\) is 1 cm (open triangles) or 5 cm (open circles). The larger the distance between branches, the more the asymptotic conductance is controlled by the principal root properties. The equivalent conductance starts to be affected by the conductance of the lateral roots after a certain \(\mathrm {K_{lat}}\) value that varies with \(\mathrm {k_{r}}\). When \(\mathrm {K_{lat}}\) tends to zero, the solution becomes equivalent to a single unbranched root system and reaches the dashed lines asymptotically.

## 3 Applications

### 3.1 Application to experimental data

In a first experiment, Zwieniecki et al. (2002) cut the proximal end of primary maize root branches and measured the conductance of the remaining part. Repeating this procedure several times and for several root axes, they obtained data of water flow under a given potential difference as a function of the distance to the root tip. The experimental results are shown in Fig. 8 (left panel, symbols). Each colour stands for a different root branch analysed by Zwieniecki et al. (2002). A second experiment was performed on other RS in which the distal part of the roots that was cut (right panel, symbols). This time they measured the conductance of the proximal root branch region. Adding some microscopic cross sections to this framework, they observed two distinct zones in the root branches: the axially nonconductive tip and a second radially active zone whose cortex was composed by early metaxylem vessels. Although the root axis is composed of two parts, we can consider that only the second part takes up water and treat the RS as a homogeneous root made only by the oldest segments. Equations from single homogeneous root section are consequently valid. The second equality of Eq. (8) relates the root branch conductance \(\mathrm {K_{rs}}\) to the root segment length \(\mathrm {l_{root}}\). It can be used directly for the first experiment consequently. This relation was fitted to the dataset in order to optimize local axial and radial conductivity for each root using the reference potential differences mentioned in the study of 0.38 MPa. For the second experiment the measured flow are given as the difference between the total uncut root flow and the flow of the proximal end. So we present the results in a similar form: \(\mathrm {K_{rs} (l_{root}) - K_{rs,prox}}\) with \(K_{rs,prox} = \kappa tanh(\tau z)\).

Only considering one root zone allows an extremely good fit to the observations represented by the colour symbols. We obtain a very strong correlation between the modelled (solid lines) and the measured conductances (symbols): \(\mathrm {r^2=0.99}\) as shown in the left panel representing the first experiment. The second experiment (right panel) provides results almost as good as the previous ones: \(\mathrm {r^2=0.92}\). In this plot, the results are presented in a form similar to the the original one of Zwieniecki et al. (2002): as the difference of the total root conductance minus the conductance of the proximal zone. As it can be seen easily from the left panel, as the root grows (but this is valid also for the second experiment), the conductance reaches a plateau just as the Eq. (8) predicts it. It means that the xylem conductance becomes limiting the water flow in these roots.

### 3.2 Application example: a maize root system

We can use the model including laterals to calculate the primary conductance and finally the RS conductance. The \(\mathrm {d_{inter}}\) parameter is provided by the mean value of the inter-branches distance of RootTyp parametrized for maize (Couvreur et al. 2014).

In the bottom panels of Fig. 9 we consider a change of \(\pm 50\)% for the local conductivities of both primary (left) and lateral (right) roots, everything else kept constant. In these panels the dashed lines stand for the radial conductivity while the solid lines represent the axial intrinsic conductances. The colour blue indicate the primary roots and the red colour, the laterals. The darker the lines, the younger the zones.

The interest of such an example is to evaluate the potential benefit of increasing locally the root conductivity on RS conductance.Performing a sensitivity analysis on mature roots, we investigate which zone is the most resistive part of complex root systems. This sensitivity analysis is based on both hydraulic (obtained by Doussan et al. 1998b) and architectural parameters (growth and shape parameters of the maize plant for RootTyp (Pags et al. 2004).

We can first notice that hydraulic property relative changes of primaries would not have a big impact on the total RS conductance. Indeed the axial conductivity of mature primaries are high enough to conduct the total amount of water until the collar while their radial conductivity is so low that even if the pressure head drops until the collar would be negligible increasing them the consequent change in conductance would be tiny.

The radial conductivity of young segments of lateral roots will have an important (the biggest) impact on global conductance even if they are not the majority of lateral segments as it can be seen from the left top panel (they constitue only 14% of the lateral root surfaces).

Javot and Maurel (2002) reviewed the aquaporin expression in roots and its effect on the root hydraulic conductivity. They listed a set of examples demonstrating the possible regulation of the root conductance according to outer stimuli. Using the present model and this sensitivity analysis we can predict the magnitude of a change in local radial conductivity needed to induce a desired modification of the water uptake in a given soil (so far only in homogeneous soil conditions but the present model could and will be coupled in the future with a soil model to simulate transient flow). Another application would be the effect of drought period and its consequent root cells shrinkage leading to a decrease of the soil–root contact and thus of the root radial conductance on macroscopic behaviour (North and Nobel 1991). Finally, the benefits of increasing local xylem vessels (Vercambre et al. 2002) or rise the radial conductivity of certain zones (Blum 2010) can be predicted using both this approach and/or complete simulations (Leitner et al. 2014b). For example from the picture (Fig. 9) it can readily be seen that increasing axial conductances of both young and intermediate lateral segments would allow raising the RS conductance significantly. Other architectural parameters can also be easily tested with this model. For example increasing the root density by reducing the value of \(\mathrm {d_{inter}}\).

If we performed here a one-by-one sensitivity analysis, combination of traits may also be considered. RS ideotypes as suggested by Lynch (2013) for maize may be evaluated through the here-developed models if proposed under the form of quantitative traits.

### 3.3 Allometric relations as a function of hydraulic properties

Allometry is the study of the relationship of body size to shape, anatomy, physiology and finally behaviour (Damuth 2001). For root systems allemoteric relations have already been proposed by Biondini (2008) linking structural functions to local functional properties.

It has been demonstrated in the section theory (see single homogeneous root or root system with laterals) that a maximal value of \(\mathrm {K_{rs}}\) is progressively approached as the root length increases. This means that an optimal root length must exist in terms of carbon cost as compared to root conductance gain. This optimal length allows defining allometric relations between structural and functional root properties. Here below we define these relations for 2 cases.

First we consider a single homogeneous branch and ask the following question: If we increase the radial (resp. axial) conductivity of a homogeneous root by a factor a (resp. by a factor of b), how much may we reduce the root length and keep the same global conductance value?

Interestingly Eqs. (27) are independent on the root hydraulics or geometric properties. Increasing the radial (resp. axial) root branch conductivity, Eq. (27) a (resp. b) provides the new length necessary to reach half of the original asymptotic conductance normalized by the previous length. Figure 10 shows these functions when the factor \(\mathrm {a}\) (solid line) or \(\mathrm {b}\) are in the range [1 10]. The new root branch length is always smaller when increasing the radial conductivity as compared to increasing the axial conductivity. Moreover the new branch length is always larger than 0.9 in this range when raising the axial hydraulic properties while it decreases until 0.1 when focusing on the radial hydraulic properties.

Here again an analytical solution of the problem can be found. In Fig. 11, we plot these relations as a function of \(\mathrm {k_r}\) to \(\mathrm {k_x}\) ratio. In the left subplot, five different levels of \(\mathrm {K_{lat}}\) are considered while in the right subplot we draw the results for four distinct internodal distances. In other words, if we consider a plant root whose \(\mathrm {\frac{k_r}{k_x}}\) ratio is fixed as well as \(\mathrm {K_{lat}}\), then Fig. 11a gives the maximal internodal distance that makes sense in a hydraulic framework that increases significantly the unbranched conductance). Beyond this maximal internodal distance the primary axial intrinsic conductance avoids a significant contribution of the laterals on the RS conductance. The same explanation is valid for the second subplot: if \(\mathrm {\frac{k_r}{k_x}}\) and \(\mathrm {d_{inter}}\) are fixed then the five lines represent the minimal conductance of laterals compatible with a significant increase of the global conductance. \(\mathrm {\epsilon }\) was fixed to 5%. If the lateral conductance is lower, it is too tiny compared to the primary radial conductivity to significantly contribute to the RS conductance.

### 3.4 Future model applications

The emergence of common database collecting root structural, topological and hydraulic properties in a unique format (Lobet et al. 2015) makes possible the use of the present model to calculate and to collect macroscopic parameters of any listed species.

A coupling can also be made between any software analysing root architecture from experiments (a non-exhaustive list is referenced by Lobet et al. 2013) and such a model enabling an automatized analysis of global properties of genotypes if local conductivity functions are available a priori. Otherwise an additional work of determining these functions will be needed but the equations presented in this paper can also be useful to retrieve shapes and values of these conductivity relationships from some global conductance measurements added to any technique delivering a complete root architecture (topology, age and order distribution such as in Leitner et al. 2014a)

Finally this model could be coupled with the novel macroscopic root water uptake model developed by Couvreur et al. (2012) to investigate the effect of modifying any trait first on plant parameters and afterwards on plant ability to maintain or to increase its yield (through transpiration) under drought condition when the environment is provided. In further studies, breeding proposals of Comas et al. (2013), Lynch (2013) and Wasson et al. (2012) will be tested in silico in various contexts defined as a combination of soil and climate. Using a model solving water flow in soil and plant will also allow us to retrieve the impact of given traits on soil moisture and potential distribution (Teuling et al. 2006). The new developments presented here allow us to calculate plant-scale parameters of idealized root systems. These parameters (calculated in homogeneous conditions) can be used for simulating root water uptake in non-homogeneous conditions as demonstrated by Couvreur et al. (2012). The methodology presented here constitutes thus the first step in a larger study to predict the plant performance in contrasted (and heterogeneous) environments. Our results are tools to accurately and efficiently calculate plant-scale parameters that can be used in turn in soil–root system model simulating the water flow to assess plant performance. They consequently need to be coupled with soil model (de Jong van Lier et al. 2008). The performance of root systems when simulated in contrasted environment will be indeed highly dependent on the macroscopic parameters (that represent the ability to take up water and the location of the root water uptake) as well as the pedoclimatic situations. Next studies will consequently focus on plant–environment interactions in order to look for best associations and to decipher key traits for an optimal root water uptake in contrasted and heterogeneous conditions.

Some of the major roles of root systems are water and nutrient uptake from soils. In this paper, we considered the hydraulic macroscopic parameters of the root system and their dependence on the hydraulic properties of root segments and the distribution of lateral roots. However, the search for an optimized root system is a multi-objective optimization problem that should consider optimal water but also nutrient uptake under minimal carbon costs. This optimum might furthermore depend on the soil hydraulic and chemical properties, the nutrient and water distribution and the climate. As far as the nutrient uptake is considered, further work is needed to link the distribution of nutrient uptake to root properties and nutrient distributions. But, the current work partly contributes to this issue since water uptake distributions influence nutrient transport to the root surfaces directly by advective flow and indirectly by changing water content and consequently the diffusion coefficient. Next studies simulating simultaneous water and nutrient uptakes may help identifying key properties for the capture of these resources in each type of environments.

Further studies will consequently focus on the use of such equations to decipher the soil–plant relation in a complete Root–Soil model solving the water flow in soil and root systems in three dimensions and in particular on the relations between the macroscopic parameters and the cumulative transpiration in a range of environments.

## 4 Conclusion

We present novel mathematical functions that predict plant scale hydraulic properties from measurable local structural and functional properties. The first parameter is the root global conductance \(\mathrm {K_{rs}}\); the second parameter describes the potential relative uptake in uniform soil and is called the Standard Uptake Density \(\mathrm {SUD}\). These new root models were developed based on analytical solutions (and their approximations) of root water flow equations. Such functions may allow breeders to quantitatively a priori assess how a local root trait affects the global plant hydraulic properties, which opens new avenues for optimizing plant drougth tolerance for instance.

Three types of simplistic root systems were considered: a homogeneous single root branch, a single root branch split into several homogeneous zones or a single root branch with regularly spaced laterals. For these three root systems, macroscopic parameters can always be predicted as a function of local functional and architectural root traits. The relevant architectural traits were the total root length, the length of the homogeneous root zone, the distance between laterals. The functional parameters were the axial conductance and the radial conductivity of the homogeneous zones, of the primary and of the laterals.

For a homogeneous root or a root with laterals, it was demonstrated that a maximum conductance is reached after a certain length for given set of \(k_r\) and \(k_x\) values, which mean that optimal root lengths must exist in terms of hydraulics.

These models were successfully applied to laboratory data or used in sensitivity analyses of RHA to investigate the impact of local traits on global plant hydraulic behaviour. Finally they can be seen as a tool for deriving quantitative links between hydraulic and architectural traits of root systems.

Based on these simple RS functions, models for more realistic RS architectures can be built, paving the way for quantitative estimation of the impact of changes in root traits on plant uptake efficiency. It is expected that other architectural traits like root angles will play a role in the estimate of \(\mathrm {SUD}\) with more complex systems.

Applications of these functions may allow one to quantitatively assess *in silico* ideotypes, i.e. root systems with ideal traits for drought tolerance as proposed by Comas et al. (2013), Lynch (2013) and Wasson et al. (2012).

## References

- Alm DM, Cavelier J, Nobel PS (1992) A finite-element model of radial and axial conductivities for individual roots: development and validation for two desert succulents. Ann Bot 69(1):87–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Biondini M (2008) Allometric scaling laws for water uptake by plant roots. J Theor Biol 251(1):35–59MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Blum A (2010) Plant breeding for water-limited environments. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Cattivelli L, Rizza F, Badeck F-W, Mazzucotelli E, Mastrangelo AM, Francia E, Mar C, Tondelli A, Stanca AM (2008) Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: an integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crops Res 105(12):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Comas LH, Becker SR, Cruz VMV, Byrne PF, Dierig DA (2013) Root traits contributing to plant productivity under drought. Front Plant Sci 4:442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Couvreur V, Vanderborght J, Draye X, Javaux M (2014) Dynamic aspects of soil water availability for isohydric plants: focus on root hydraulic resistances. Water Resour Res 50(11):8891–8906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Couvreur V, Vanderborght J, Javaux M (2012) A simple three-dimensional macroscopic root water uptake model based on the hydraulic architecture approach. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16(8):2957–2971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cowan IR (1965) Transport of water in the soil–plant–atmosphere system. J Appl Ecol 2(1):221MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Damuth J (2001) Scaling of growth: plants and animals are not so different. Proc Nat Acad Sci 98(5):2113–2114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- de Dorlodot S, Forster B, Pags L, Price A, Tuberosa R, Draye X (2007) Root system architecture: opportunities and constraints for genetic improvement of crops. Trends Plant Sci 12(10):474–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- de Jong van Lier Q, van Dam JC, Durigon A, dos Santos MA, Metselaar K (2013) Modeling water potentials and flows in the soil plant system comparing hydraulic resistances and transpiration reduction functions. Vadose Zone J 12(3):0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- de Jong van Lier Q, van Dam JC, Metselaar K, de Jong R, Duijnisveld WHM (2008) Macroscopic root water uptake distribution using a matric flux potential approach. Vadose Zone J 7(3):1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dixon HH, Joly J (1895) On the ascent of sap. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 186:563–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Doussan C, Pags L, Vercambre G (1998a) Modelling of the hydraulic architecture of root systems: an integrated approach to water absorption model description. Ann Bot 81(2):213–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Doussan C, Vercambre G, Pags L (1998b) Modelling of the hydraulic architecture of root systems: An integrated approach to water absorption distribution of axial and radial conductances in maize. Ann Bot 81(2):225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jarvis NJ (2011) Simple physics-based models of compensatory plant water uptake: concepts and eco-hydrological consequences. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15(11):3431–3446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Javaux M, Couvreur V, Vanderborght J, Vereecken H (2013) Root water uptake: from three-dimensional biophysical processes to macroscopic modeling approaches. Vadose Zone J 12(4)Google Scholar
- Javaux M, Schröder T, Vanderborght J, Vereecken H (2008) Use of a three-dimensional detailed modeling approach for predicting root water uptake. Vadose Zone J 7(3):1079–1088Google Scholar
- Javot H, Maurel C (2002) The role of aquaporins in root water uptake. Ann Bot 90(3):301–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Landsberg JJ, Fowkes ND (1978) Water movement through plant roots. Ann Bot 42(3):493–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Leitner D, Felderer B, Vontobel P, Schnepf A (2014a) Recovering root system traits using image analysis exemplified by two-dimensional neutron radiography images of lupine. Plant Physiol 164(1):24–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Leitner D, Meunier F, Bodner G, Javaux M, Schnepf A (2014b) Impact of contrasted maize root traits at flowering on water stress tolerance: a simulation study. Field Crops Res 165:125–137Google Scholar
- Lobet G, Couvreur V, Meunier F, Javaux M, Draye X (2014) Plant Water Uptake in Drying Soils. Plant Physiol 164(4):1619–1627Google Scholar
- Lobet G, Draye X, Périlleux C (2013) An online database for plant image analysis software tools. Plant Methods 9(1):38Google Scholar
- Lobet G, Pound MP, Diener J, Pradal C, Draye X, Godin C, Javaux M, Leitner D, Meunier F, Nacry P, Pridmore TP, Schnepf A (2015) Root system markup language: toward a unified root architecture description language. Plant Physiol, page pp.114.253625Google Scholar
- Lynch JP (2013) Steep, cheap and deep: an ideotype to optimize water and N acquisition by maize root systems. Ann BotGoogle Scholar
- McElrone AJ, Choat B, Gambetta GA, Brodersen CR (2013) Water uptake and transport in vascular plants. Nat Educ Knowl 5(4):6Google Scholar
- North GB, Nobel PS (1991) Changes in hydraulic conductivity and anatomy caused by drying and rewetting roots of agave deserti (Agavaceae). Am J Bot 78(7):906–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pagès L, Vercambre G, Drouet JL, Lecompte F, Collet C, Le Bot J (2004) Root Typ: a generic model to depict and analyse the root system architecture. Plant Soil 258(1):103–119Google Scholar
- Passioura J (2006) Increasing crop productivity when water is scarce from breeding to field management. Agric Water Manag 80:176–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Roose T, Schnepf A (2008) Mathematical models of plant soil interaction. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 366(1885):4597–4611MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Steudle E (2001) The cohension-tension mechanism and the acquisition of water by plant roots. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 52(1):847–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tardieu F (2012) Any trait or trait-related allele can confer drought tolerance: just design the right drought scenario. J Exp Bot 63(1):25–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tardieu F, Simonneau T, Parent B (2015) Modelling the coordination of the controls of stomatal aperture, transpiration, leaf growth, and abscisic acid: update and extension of the Tardieu-Davies model. J Exp Bot 66(8):2227–2237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Teuling AJ, Uijlenhoet R, Hupet F, Troch PA (2006) Impact of plant water uptake strategy on soil moisture and evapotranspiration dynamics during drydown. Geophys Res Lett 33(3):722–727Google Scholar
- Thévenin L (1883) Extension of Ohm’s law to complex electromotive circuits. Annales tlgraphiques 10:222–224Google Scholar
- Tyree MT, Ewers FW (1991) The hydraulic architecture of trees and other woody plants. New Phytol 119(3):345–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vadez V (2014) Root hydraulics: the forgotten side of roots in drought adaptation. Field Crops Res 165:15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- van den Honert TH (1948) Water transport in plants as a catenary process. Discuss Faraday Soc 3:146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vercambre G, Doussan C, Pagès L, Habib P, Pierret A (2002) Influence of xylem development on axial hydraulic conductance within Prunus root systems. Tree 16(7):479–487Google Scholar
- Volpe V, Marani M, Albertson J, Katul G (2013) Root controls on water redistribution and carbon uptake in the soil plant system under current and future climate. Adv Water Resour 60:110–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wasson AP, Richards RA, Chatrath R, Misra SC, Prasad SV, Rebetzke GJ, Kirkegaard JA, Christopher J, Watt M (2012) Traits and selection strategies to improve root systems and water uptake in water-limited wheat crops. J Exp Bot 63(9):3485–3498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wheeler TD, Stroock AD (2008) The transpiration of water at negative pressures in a synthetic tree. Nature 455(7210):208–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zimmermann MH (1978) Hydraulic architecture of some diffuse-porous trees. Can J Bot 56(18):2286–2295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zwieniecki MA, Thompson MV, Holbrook NM (2002) Understanding the hydraulics of porous pipes: tradeoffs between water uptake and root length utilization. J Plant Growth Regul 21(4):315–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar

## Copyright information

**Open Access**This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.