On a poroviscoelastic model for cell crawling
- 412 Downloads
In this paper a minimal, one-dimensional, two-phase, viscoelastic, reactive, flow model for a crawling cell is presented. Two-phase models are used with a variety of constitutive assumptions in the literature to model cell motility. We use an upper-convected Maxwell model and demonstrate that even the simplest of two-phase, viscoelastic models displays features relevant to cell motility. We also show care must be exercised in choosing parameters for such models as a poor choice can lead to an ill–posed problem. A stability analysis reveals that the initially stationary, spatially uniform strip of cytoplasm starts to crawl in response to a perturbation which breaks the symmetry of the network volume fraction or network stress. We also demonstrate numerically that there is a steady travelling-wave solution in which the crawling velocity has a bell-shaped dependence on adhesion strength, in agreement with biological observation.
KeywordsCell motility Two-phase flow Viscoelastic Cell Adhesion
Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)92C17 76A10 76T99
This publication is based on work supported by Award No. KUK-C1-013-04, made by King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST). S.L.W. is grateful for funding from the EPSRC in the form of an Advanced Research Fellowship.
- Alt W, Bock M, Möhl C (2010) Cell mechanics: from single-scale based models to multiscale modeling. In: Chauvière A, Preziosi L, Verdier C (eds) Coupling of cytoplasm and adhesion dynamics determines cell polarization and locomotion. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, London, New York, p 89–132Google Scholar
- Balay S, Gropp WD, Curfman McInnes L, Smith BF (1997) Modern software tools for scientific computing. In: Arge E, Bruaset AM, Langtangen HP (eds) Efficient management of parallelism in object oriented numerical software libraries. Birkhäuser Press, Boston, p 163–202Google Scholar
- Balay S, Brown J, Buschelman K, Eijkhout V, Gropp WD, Kaushik D, Knepley MG, Curfman McInnes L, Smith BF, Zhang H (2010) PETSc users manual. anl-95/11—revision 3.1. Argonne National LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
- Balay S, Brown J, Buschelman K, Gropp WD, Kaushik D, Knepley MG, Curfman McInnes L, Smith BF, Zhang H (2011) PETSc Web page. http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc.
- Bray D (2001) Cell movements: from molecules to motility. Garland Science, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Cogan NG, Keener JP (2004) The role of the biofilm matrix in structural development. Math Med Biol 21(2):147–166Google Scholar
- Dembo M, Harlow F, Alt W (1984) Cell surface dynamics: concepts and models. In: Perelson AS, DeLisi C, Wiegel FW (eds) The biophysics of cell surface motility. Marcel Dekker, New York, p 495–542Google Scholar
- Herant M, Heinrich V, Dembo M (2006) Mechanics of neutrophil phagocytosis: experiments and quantitative models. J Cell Sci 119:1903–1913Google Scholar
- Kimpton L, Whiteley J, Waters S, King J, Oliver J (2012) Multiple travelling-wave solutions in a minimal model for cell motility. Math Med Biol Adv Access. doi: 10.1093/imammb/dqs023 (published July 11, 2012)
- Mogilner A, Marland E, Bottino D (2001) A minimal model of locomotion applied to the steady gliding movement of fish keratocyte cells. In: Maini P, Othmer H (eds) Mathematical models for biological pattern formation, the IMA volumes in mathematics and its applications, vol 121. Springer, New York, pp 269–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar