Journal of Mathematical Biology

, Volume 68, Issue 1–2, pp 57–80 | Cite as

A viscoelastic model of blood capillary extension and regression: derivation, analysis, and simulation

Article

Abstract

This work studies a fundamental problem in blood capillary growth: how the cell proliferation or death induces the stress response and the capillary extension or regression. We develop a one-dimensional viscoelastic model of blood capillary extension/regression under nonlinear friction with surroundings, analyze its solution properties, and simulate various growth patterns in angiogenesis. The mathematical model treats the cell density as the growth pressure eliciting a viscoelastic response from the cells, which again induces extension or regression of the capillary. Nonlinear analysis captures two cases when the biologically meaningful solution exists: (1) the cell density decreases from root to tip, which may occur in vessel regression; (2) the cell density is time-independent and is of small variation along the capillary, which may occur in capillary extension without proliferation. The linear analysis with perturbation in cell density due to proliferation or death predicts the global biological solution exists provided the change in cell density is sufficiently slow in time. Examples with blow-ups are captured by numerical approximations and the global solutions are recovered by slow growth processes, which validate the linear analysis theory. Numerical simulations demonstrate this model can reproduce angiogenesis experiments under several biological conditions including blood vessel extension without proliferation and blood vessel regression.

Keywords

Angiogenesis Viscoelastic Growth pressure Extension Regression 

Mathematics Subject Classification

92C10 35K61 

References

  1. Anderson ARA, Chaplain MAJ (1998) Continuous and discrete mathematical models of tumor-induced angiogenesis. Bull Math Biol 60:857–900CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Ausprunk DH, Folkman J (1977) Migration and proliferation of endothelial cells in preformed and newly formed blood vessels during tumor angiogenesis. Microvasc Res 14:53–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balding D, McElwain DLS (1985) A mathematical model of tumor-induced capillary growth. J Theor Biol 114:53–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauer AL, Jackson TL, Jiang Y (2007) A cell-based model exhibiting branching and anastomosis during tumor-induced angiogenesis. Biophys J 92:3105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauer AL, Jackson TL, Jiang Y (2009) Topography of extracellular matrix mediates vascular morphogenesis and migration speeds in angiogenesis. PLoS Comput Biol 5:e1000445CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. Bausch AR, Ziemann F, Boulbitch AA, Jacobson K, Sackmann E (1998) Local measurements of viscoelastic parameters of adherent cell surfaces by magnetic bead microrheometry. Biophys J 75:2038–2049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bentley K, Gerhardt H, Bates PA (2008) Agent-based simulation of notch mediated tip cell selection in angiogenic sprout initialisation. J Theor Biol 250:25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bentley K, Mariggi G, Gerhardt H, Bates PA (2009) Tipping the balance: robustness of tip cell selection, migration and fusion in angiogenesis. PLoS Comput Biol 5(10):e1000549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Byrne HM, Chaplain MAJ (1995) Mathematical models for tumour angiogenesis: numerical simulations and nonlinear wave solutions. Bull Math Biol 57:461–486MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Capasso V, Morale D (2009) Stochastic modelling of tumour-induced angiogenesis. J Math Biol 58:219–233CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. Carmeliet P, Jain RK (2011) Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications of angiogenesis. Nature 473:298–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Costa KD, Sim AJ, Yin FCP (2006) Non-hertzian approach to analyzing mechanical properties of endothelial cells probed by atomic force microscopy. J Biomech Eng 128:176–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. CRC (1992–1993) Handbook of chemistry and physics, 73rd edn. Chemical Rubber Publishing Company, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  14. Dastjerdi MH, Al-Arfaj KM, Nallasamy N, Hamrah P, Jurkunas UV, Pavan-Langston D, Dana R (2009) Topical bevacizumab in the treatment of corneal neovascularization: results of a prospective, open-label, noncomparative study. Arch Ophthalmol 127:381–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Smet F, Segura I, De Bock K, Hohensinner PJ, Carmeliet P (2009) Mechanisms of vessel branching: filopodia on endothelial tip cells lead the way. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 29:639–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fernandez P, Ott A (2008) Single cell mechanics: stress stiffening and kinematic hardening. Phys Rev Lett 100:238102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fozard JA, Byrne HM, Jensen OE, King JR (2010) Continuum approximations of individual-based models for epithelial monolayers. Math Med Biol 27:39–74CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. Fung YC, Tong P (2001) Classical and computational solid mechanics. World Scientific, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  19. Garikipati K (2009) The kinematics of biological growth. Appl Mech Rev 62:030801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gerhardt H et al (2003) VEGF guides angiogenic sprouting utilizing endothelial tip cell filopodia. J Cell Biol 161:1163–1177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gerhardt H (2008) VEGF and endothelial guidance in angiogenic sprouting. Organogenesis 4:241–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gerhardt H, Betsholtz C (2005) How do endothelial cells orientate? EXS 94:3–15Google Scholar
  23. Gracheva ME, Othmer HG (2004) A continuum model of motility in ameboid cells. Bull Math Biol 66:167–193CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. Hamilton NB, Attwell D, Hall CN (2010) Pericyte-mediated regulation of capillary diameter: a component of neurovascular coupling in health and disease. Front Neuroenerg 2:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holmes MJ, Sleeman BD (2000) A mathematical model of tumour angiogenesis incorporating cellular traction and viscoelastic effects. J Theor Biol 202:95–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jackson T, Zheng X (2010) A cell-based model of endothelial cell migration, proliferation and maturation during corneal angiogenesis. Bull Math Biol 72:830–868CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. Jo N, Mailhos C, Ju M et al (2006) Inhibition of platelet-derived growth factor B signaling enhances the efficacy of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in multiple models of ocular neovascularization. Am J Pathol 168(6):2036–2053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lamalice L, Le Boeuf F, Huot J (2007) Endothelial cell migration during angiogenesis. Circ Res 100:782–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Larripa K, Mogilner A (2006) Transport of a 1d viscoelastic actin-myosin strip of gel as a model of a crawling cell. Physica A 372:113–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Levine HA, Nilsen-Hamilton M (2006) Angiogenesis-a biochemial/mathematical perspective. In: Friedman A (ed) Tutorials in mathematical biosciences III. Springer, Berlin, p 65Google Scholar
  31. Levine HA, Pamuk S, Sleeman BD, Nilsen-Hamilton M (2001) Mathematical modeling of capillary formation and development in tumor angiogenesis: penetration into the stroma. Bull Math Biol 63:801–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lieberman GM (1996) Second order parabolic differential equations. World Scientific, SingaporeCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu G, Qutub AA, Vempati P, Popel AS (2011) Module-based multiscale simulation of angiogenesis in skeletal muscle. Theor Biol Med Model 8:6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Manoussaki D (2003) A mechanochemical model of angiogenesis and vasculogenesis. ESAIM Math Model Numer Anal 37:581–599CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  35. McDougall SR, Anderson AR, Chaplain MA, Sherratt JA (2002) Mathematical modelling of flow through vascular networks: implications for tumour-induced angiogenesis and chemotherapy strategies. Bull Math Biol 64(4):673–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McDougall SR, Anderson ARA, Chaplain MAJ (2006) Mathematical modelling of dynamic adaptive tumour-induced angiogenesis: clinical implications and therapeutic targeting strategies. J Theor Biol 241:564–589CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  37. Mantzaris N, Webb S, Othmer HG (2004) Mathematical modeling of tumor-induced angiogenesis. J Math Biol 49:111–187CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  38. Mi Q, Swigon D, Rivière R, Selma C, Vodovotz Y, Hackam DJ (2007) One-dimensional elastic continuum model of enterocyte layer migration. Biophys J 93:3745–3752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Milde F, Bergdorf M, Koumoutsakos P (2008) A hybrid model for three-dimensional simulations of sprouting angiogenesis. Biophys J 95:3146–3160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Peirce SM (2008) Computational and mathematical modeling of angiogenesis. Microcirculation 15:739–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Peirce SM, Van Gieson EJ, Skalak TC (2004) Multicellular simulation predicts microvascular patterning and in silico tissue assembly. FASEB J 18:731–733Google Scholar
  42. Pettet GJ, Byrne HM, McElwain DLS, Norbury J (1996) A model of wound-healing angiogenesis in soft tissue. Math Biosci 263:1487–1493Google Scholar
  43. Plank MJ, Sleeman BD (2003) A reinforced random walk model of tumor angiogenesis and anti-angiogenesis strategies. Mathe Med Biol 20:135–181CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. Plank MJ, Sleeman BD (2004) Lattice and non-lattice models of tumour angiogenesis. Bull Math Biol 66:1785–1819CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  45. Plank MJ, Sleeman BD, Jones PF (2004) A mathematical model of tumour angiogenesis, regulated by vascular endothelial growth factor and the angiopoietins. J Theor Biol 229:435–454CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  46. Prass M, Jacobson K, Mogilner A, Radmacher M (2006) Direct measurement of the lamellipodial protrusive force in a migrating cell. J Cell Biol 174:767–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pries AR, Secomb TW, Gaehtgens P (1998) Structural adaptation and stability of microvascular networks: theory and simulations. Am J Physiol 275:349–360Google Scholar
  48. Pries AR, Reglin B, Secomb TW (2001) Structural adaptation of microvascular networks: functional roles of adaptive responses. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 281:H1015–H1025Google Scholar
  49. Qutub A, Mac Gabhann A (2009) Multiscale models of angiogenesis: integration of molecular mechanisms with cell- and organ-level models. IEEE Eng Med Biol 28:14–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Qutub A, Popel A (2009) Elongation, proliferation and migration differentiate endothelial cell phenotypes and determine capillary sprouting. BMC Syst Biol 3:13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schmidt M et al (2007) EGFL7 regulates the collective migration of endothelial cells by restricting their spatial distribution. Development 134:2913–2923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schugart RC, Friedman A, Zhao R, Sen CK (2008) Wound angiogenesis as a function of tissue oxygen tension: a mathematical model. PNAS 105:2628–2633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Semino CE, Kamm RD, Lauffenburger DA (2006) Autocrine EGF receptor activation mediates endothelial cell migration and vascular morphogenesis induced by VEGF under interstitial flow. Exp Cell Res 312:289–298Google Scholar
  54. Shirinifard A, Gens JS, Zaitlen BL, Popawski NJ, Swat M et al (2009) 3D multi-cell simulation of tumor growth and angiogenesis. PLoS One 4:e7190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sholley MM, Ferguson GP, Seibel HR, Montour JL, Wilson JD (1984) Mechanisms of neovascularization. Vascular sprouting can occur without proliferation of endothelial cells. Lab Investig 51:624–634Google Scholar
  56. Sleeman BD, Wallis IP (2002) Tumour induced angiogenesis as a reinforced random walk: modeling capillary network formation without endothelial cell proliferation. J Math Comput Model 36:339–358CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  57. Stokes CL, Lauffenburger DA (1991) Analysis of the roles of microvessel endothelial cell random mobility and chemotaxis in angiogenesis. J Theor Biol 152:377–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sun S, Wheeler MF, Obeyesekere M, Patrick C (2005) A deterministic model of growth factor induced angiogenesis. Bull Math Biol 67:313–337CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  59. Swartz MA, Fleury ME (2007) Interstitial flow and Its effects in soft tissues. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 9:229–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thoumine O, Ott A (1997) Time scale dependent viscoelastic and contractile regimes in fibroblasts probed by microplate manipulation. J Cell Sci 110:2109–2116Google Scholar
  61. Tong S, Yuan F (2001) Numerical simulations of angiogenesis in the cornea. Microvasc Res 61:14–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Travasso RDM, Corvera Poir E (2011) Tumor angiogenesis and vascular patterning: a mathematical model. PLoS One 6:e19989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Xue C, Friedman A, Sen CK (2009) A mathematical model of ischemic cutaneous wounds. PNAS 106:16782–16787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vakoc BJ et al (2009) Three-dimensional microscopy of the tumor microenvironment in vivo using optical frequency domain imaging. Nat Med 15:1219–1223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Volokh KY (2006) Stresses in growing soft tissues. Acta Biomater 2:493–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wcislo R, Dzwinel W, Yuen D, Dudek A (2009) A 3-D model of tumor progression based on complex automata driven by particle dynamics. J Mol Model 15:1517–1539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zeng G, Taylor SM, McColm JR, Kappas NC, Kearney JB, Williams LH, Hartnett ME, Bautch VL (2007) Orientation of endothelial cell division is regulated by VEGF signaling during blood vessel formation. Blood 109:1345–1352CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsCentral Michigan UniversityMount PleasantUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics, Institute of Natural Sciences, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Scientific and Engineering ComputingShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations