# The effect of population heterogeneities upon spread of infection

- First Online:

- Received:
- Revised:

- 5 Citations
- 402 Downloads

## Abstract

It has often been observed that population heterogeneities can lead to outbreaks of infection being less frequent and less severe than homogeneous population models would suggest. We address this issue by comparing a model incorporating various forms of heterogeneity with a homogenised model matched according to the value of the basic reproduction number \(R_0\). We mainly focus upon heterogeneity in individuals’ infectivity and susceptibility, though with some allowance also for heterogeneous patterns of mixing. The measures of infectious spread we consider are (i) the probability of a major outbreak; (ii) the mean outbreak size; (iii) the mean endemic prevalence level; and (iv) the persistence time. For each measure, we establish conditions under which heterogeneity leads to a reduction in infectious spread. We also demonstrate that if such conditions are not satisfied, the reverse may occur. As well as comparison with a homogeneous population, we investigate comparisons between two heterogeneous populations of differing degrees of heterogeneity. All of our results are derived under the assumption that the susceptible population is sufficiently large.

### Keywords

Basic reproduction number SIR epidemic SIS epidemic Outbreak size Endemic prevalence Fade-out of infection### Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

92D30 60J85 60J28### References

- Adler FR (1992) The effects of averaging on the basic reproduction ratio. Math Biosci 111:89–98CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Andersson H, Britton T (1998) Heterogeneity in epidemic models and its effect on the spread of infection. J Appl Probab 35:651–661MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Andersson H, Britton T (2000) Stochastic epidemics in dynamic populations: quasi-stationarity and extinction. J Math Biol 41:559–580MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Andreasen V (2003) Dynamics of annual influenza A epidemics with immuno-selection. J Math Biol 46:504–536MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Andreasen V (2011) The final size of an epidemic and its relation to the basic reproduction number. Bull Math Biol 73:2305–2321MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ball FG (1983) The threshold behaviour of epidemic models. J Appl Probab 20:227–241MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Ball FG (1985) Deterministic and stochastic epidemics with several kinds of susceptibles. Adv Appl Probab 17:1–22CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Ball FG (1986) A unified approach to the distribution of total size and total area under the trajectory of infectives in epidemic models. Adv Appl Probab 18:289–310CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Ball FG (1999) Stochastic and deterministic models for SIS epidemics among a population partitioned into households. Math Biosci 156:41–68MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Ball FG, Britton T, Lyne OD (2004) Stochastic multitype epidemics in a community of households: estimation of threshold parameter and secure vaccination coverage. Biometrika 91:345–362MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Ball FG, Clancy D (1993) The final size and severity of a generalised stochastic multitype epidemic model. Adv Appl Probab 25:721–736MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Barbour AD (1972) The principle of the diffusion of arbitrary constants. J Appl Probab 9:519–541MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Barbour AD (1976) Quasi-stationary distributions in Markov population processes. Adv Appl Probab 8: 296–314MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Becker N, Marschner I (1990) The effect of heterogeneity on the spread of disease. Lect Notes Biomath 86:90–103Google Scholar
- Blackwell D (1951) Comparisons of experiments. In: Proceedings of the second Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 93–102Google Scholar
- Blackwell D (1953) Equivalent comparisons of experiments. Ann Math Stat 24:265–272MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Borwein JM, Lewis AS, Nussbaum RD (1994) Entropy minimization, DAD problems, and doubly stochastic kernels. J Funct Anal 123:264–307MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Britton T, Lindenstrand D (2009) Epidemic modelling: aspects where stochasticity matters. Math Biosci 222:109–116MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Clancy D, Mendy ST (2011) The effect of waning immunity on long-term behaviour of stochastic models for the spread of infection. J Math Biol 61:527–544MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Darroch J, Seneta E (1967) On quasi-stationary distributions in absorbing continuous-time finite Markov chains. J Appl Probab 4:192–196MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Ethier SN, Kurtz TG (1986) Markov processes: characterization and convergence. Wiley, New JerseyCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Gardiner CG (2009) Stochastic methods: a handbook for the natural and social sciences. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Hagenaars TJ, Donnelly CA, Ferguson NM (2004) Spatial heterogeneity and the persistence of infectious diseases. J Theor Biol 229:349–359MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hethcote HW (1996) Modeling heterogeneous mixing in infectious disease dynamics. In: Isham V, Medley GFH (eds) Models for infectious human diseases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 215–238Google Scholar
- Hethcote HW, Yorke JA (1984) Gonorrhea transmission dynamics and control. Springer, BerlinMATHGoogle Scholar
- Jagers P (1975) Branching processes with biological applications. Wiley, LondonMATHGoogle Scholar
- Keeling MJ, Rohani P (2007) Modeling infectious diseases in humans and animals. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Laub AJ (2005) Matrix analysis for scientists and engineers. SIAM publications, PhiladelphiaCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Lajmanovich A, Yorke JA (1976) A deterministic model for gonorrhea in a nonhomogeneous population. Math Biosci 28:221–236MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Lefèvre C, Malice M-P (1988) Comparisons for carrier-borne epidemics in heterogeneous and homogeneous populations. J Appl Probab 25:663–674MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Lindholm M (2008) On the time to extinction for a two-type version of Bartlett’s epidemic model. Math Biosci 212:99–108MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Lloyd-Smith JO, Schreiber SJ, Kopp PE, Getz WM (2005) Superspreading and the effect of individual variation on disease emergence. Nature 438:355–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ma J, Earn DJD (2006) Generality of the final size formula for an epidemic of a newly invading infectious disease. Bull Math Biol 68:679–702MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Marschner IC (1992) The effect of preferential mixing on the growth of an epidemic. Math Biosci 109:39–67CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Marshall AW, Olkin I, Arnold BC (2010) Inequalities: theory of majorization and its applications. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Meester R, Trapman P (2011) Bounding basic characteristics of spatial epidemics with a new percolation model. Adv Appl Probab 43:335–347MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Metz JAJ (1978) The epidemic in a closed population with all susceptibles equally vulnerable; some results for large susceptible populations and small initial infections. Acta Biother 27:75–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Miller JC (2008) Bounding the size and probability of epidemics on networks. J Appl Probab 45:498–512MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Mode CJ (1971) Multitype branching processes. Elsevier, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
- Nåsell I (1999) On the time to extinction in recurrent epidemics. J Roy Stat Soc B 61:309–330CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Nåsell I (2002) Stochastic models of some endemic infections. Math Biosci 179:1–19MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Nåsell I (2005) A new look at the critical community size for childhood infections. Theor Popul Biol 67:203–216CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Neal PJ (2006) Stochastic and deterministic analysis of SIS household epidemics. Adv Appl Probab 38: 943–968MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Nishiura H, Cook AR, Cowling BJ (2011) Assortativity and the probability of epidemic extinction: a case study of pandemic Influenza A (H1N1-2009). Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis 2011, Article ID 194507Google Scholar
- Nold A (1980) Heterogeneity in disease-transmission modelling. Math Biosci 52:227–240MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Scalia-Tomba (1986) Asymptotic final size distribution of the multitype Reed–Frost process. J Appl Probab 23:563–584MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Seneta E (1986) Non-negative matrices and Markov chains. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Vergu E, Busson H, Ezanno P (2010) Impact of the infection period distribution on the epidemic spread in a metapopulation model. PLoS ONE 5:e9371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Xiao Y, Clancy D, French NP, Bowers RG (2006) A semi-stochastic model for Salmonella infection in a multi-group herd. Math Biosci 200:214–233MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Yates A, Antia R, Regoes RR (2006) How do pathogen evolution and host heterogeneity interact in disease emergence? Proc Roy Soc B 273:3075–3083CrossRefGoogle Scholar