Journal of Mathematical Biology

, Volume 67, Issue 4, pp 963–987

The effect of population heterogeneities upon spread of infection



It has often been observed that population heterogeneities can lead to outbreaks of infection being less frequent and less severe than homogeneous population models would suggest. We address this issue by comparing a model incorporating various forms of heterogeneity with a homogenised model matched according to the value of the basic reproduction number \(R_0\). We mainly focus upon heterogeneity in individuals’ infectivity and susceptibility, though with some allowance also for heterogeneous patterns of mixing. The measures of infectious spread we consider are (i) the probability of a major outbreak; (ii) the mean outbreak size; (iii) the mean endemic prevalence level; and (iv) the persistence time. For each measure, we establish conditions under which heterogeneity leads to a reduction in infectious spread. We also demonstrate that if such conditions are not satisfied, the reverse may occur. As well as comparison with a homogeneous population, we investigate comparisons between two heterogeneous populations of differing degrees of heterogeneity. All of our results are derived under the assumption that the susceptible population is sufficiently large.


Basic reproduction number SIR epidemic SIS epidemic  Outbreak size Endemic prevalence Fade-out of infection 

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

92D30 60J85 60J28 


  1. Adler FR (1992) The effects of averaging on the basic reproduction ratio. Math Biosci 111:89–98CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson H, Britton T (1998) Heterogeneity in epidemic models and its effect on the spread of infection. J Appl Probab 35:651–661MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson H, Britton T (2000) Stochastic epidemics in dynamic populations: quasi-stationarity and extinction. J Math Biol 41:559–580MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Andreasen V (2003) Dynamics of annual influenza A epidemics with immuno-selection. J Math Biol 46:504–536MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Andreasen V (2011) The final size of an epidemic and its relation to the basic reproduction number. Bull Math Biol 73:2305–2321MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ball FG (1983) The threshold behaviour of epidemic models. J Appl Probab 20:227–241MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Ball FG (1985) Deterministic and stochastic epidemics with several kinds of susceptibles. Adv Appl Probab 17:1–22CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Ball FG (1986) A unified approach to the distribution of total size and total area under the trajectory of infectives in epidemic models. Adv Appl Probab 18:289–310CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Ball FG (1999) Stochastic and deterministic models for SIS epidemics among a population partitioned into households. Math Biosci 156:41–68MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Ball FG, Britton T, Lyne OD (2004) Stochastic multitype epidemics in a community of households: estimation of threshold parameter and secure vaccination coverage. Biometrika 91:345–362MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Ball FG, Clancy D (1993) The final size and severity of a generalised stochastic multitype epidemic model. Adv Appl Probab 25:721–736MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Barbour AD (1972) The principle of the diffusion of arbitrary constants. J Appl Probab 9:519–541MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Barbour AD (1976) Quasi-stationary distributions in Markov population processes. Adv Appl Probab 8: 296–314MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Becker N, Marschner I (1990) The effect of heterogeneity on the spread of disease. Lect Notes Biomath 86:90–103Google Scholar
  15. Blackwell D (1951) Comparisons of experiments. In: Proceedings of the second Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 93–102Google Scholar
  16. Blackwell D (1953) Equivalent comparisons of experiments. Ann Math Stat 24:265–272MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Borwein JM, Lewis AS, Nussbaum RD (1994) Entropy minimization, DAD problems, and doubly stochastic kernels. J Funct Anal 123:264–307MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Britton T, Lindenstrand D (2009) Epidemic modelling: aspects where stochasticity matters. Math Biosci 222:109–116MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Clancy D, Mendy ST (2011) The effect of waning immunity on long-term behaviour of stochastic models for the spread of infection. J Math Biol 61:527–544MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Darroch J, Seneta E (1967) On quasi-stationary distributions in absorbing continuous-time finite Markov chains. J Appl Probab 4:192–196MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Ethier SN, Kurtz TG (1986) Markov processes: characterization and convergence. Wiley, New JerseyCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Gardiner CG (2009) Stochastic methods: a handbook for the natural and social sciences. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  23. Hagenaars TJ, Donnelly CA, Ferguson NM (2004) Spatial heterogeneity and the persistence of infectious diseases. J Theor Biol 229:349–359MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hethcote HW (1996) Modeling heterogeneous mixing in infectious disease dynamics. In: Isham V, Medley GFH (eds) Models for infectious human diseases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 215–238Google Scholar
  25. Hethcote HW, Yorke JA (1984) Gonorrhea transmission dynamics and control. Springer, BerlinMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Jagers P (1975) Branching processes with biological applications. Wiley, LondonMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Keeling MJ, Rohani P (2007) Modeling infectious diseases in humans and animals. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  28. Laub AJ (2005) Matrix analysis for scientists and engineers. SIAM publications, PhiladelphiaCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Lajmanovich A, Yorke JA (1976) A deterministic model for gonorrhea in a nonhomogeneous population. Math Biosci 28:221–236MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Lefèvre C, Malice M-P (1988) Comparisons for carrier-borne epidemics in heterogeneous and homogeneous populations. J Appl Probab 25:663–674MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Lindholm M (2008) On the time to extinction for a two-type version of Bartlett’s epidemic model. Math Biosci 212:99–108MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Lloyd-Smith JO, Schreiber SJ, Kopp PE, Getz WM (2005) Superspreading and the effect of individual variation on disease emergence. Nature 438:355–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ma J, Earn DJD (2006) Generality of the final size formula for an epidemic of a newly invading infectious disease. Bull Math Biol 68:679–702MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marschner IC (1992) The effect of preferential mixing on the growth of an epidemic. Math Biosci 109:39–67CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. Marshall AW, Olkin I, Arnold BC (2010) Inequalities: theory of majorization and its applications. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  36. Meester R, Trapman P (2011) Bounding basic characteristics of spatial epidemics with a new percolation model. Adv Appl Probab 43:335–347MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. Metz JAJ (1978) The epidemic in a closed population with all susceptibles equally vulnerable; some results for large susceptible populations and small initial infections. Acta Biother 27:75–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Miller JC (2008) Bounding the size and probability of epidemics on networks. J Appl Probab 45:498–512MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. Mode CJ (1971) Multitype branching processes. Elsevier, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. Nåsell I (1999) On the time to extinction in recurrent epidemics. J Roy Stat Soc B 61:309–330CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. Nåsell I (2002) Stochastic models of some endemic infections. Math Biosci 179:1–19MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. Nåsell I (2005) A new look at the critical community size for childhood infections. Theor Popul Biol 67:203–216CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. Neal PJ (2006) Stochastic and deterministic analysis of SIS household epidemics. Adv Appl Probab 38: 943–968MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. Nishiura H, Cook AR, Cowling BJ (2011) Assortativity and the probability of epidemic extinction: a case study of pandemic Influenza A (H1N1-2009). Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis 2011, Article ID 194507Google Scholar
  45. Nold A (1980) Heterogeneity in disease-transmission modelling. Math Biosci 52:227–240MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. Scalia-Tomba (1986) Asymptotic final size distribution of the multitype Reed–Frost process. J Appl Probab 23:563–584MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. Seneta E (1986) Non-negative matrices and Markov chains. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Vergu E, Busson H, Ezanno P (2010) Impact of the infection period distribution on the epidemic spread in a metapopulation model. PLoS ONE 5:e9371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Xiao Y, Clancy D, French NP, Bowers RG (2006) A semi-stochastic model for Salmonella infection in a multi-group herd. Math Biosci 200:214–233MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  50. Yates A, Antia R, Regoes RR (2006) How do pathogen evolution and host heterogeneity interact in disease emergence? Proc Roy Soc B 273:3075–3083CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematical SciencesUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations