Advertisement

Journal of Mathematical Biology

, Volume 66, Issue 4–5, pp 1099–1122 | Cite as

Necessary and sufficient conditions for \(R_{0}\) to be a sum of contributions of fertility loops

  • Claus Rueffler
  • Johan A. J. Metz
Article

Abstract

Recently, de-Camino-Beck and Lewis (Bull Math Biol 69:1341–1354, 2007) have presented a method that under certain restricted conditions allows computing the basic reproduction ratio \(R_0\) in a simple manner from life cycle graphs, without, however, giving an explicit indication of these conditions. In this paper, we give various sets of sufficient and generically necessary conditions. To this end, we develop a fully algebraic counterpart of their graph-reduction method which we actually found more useful in concrete applications. Both methods, if they work, give a simple algebraic formula that can be interpreted as the sum of contributions of all fertility loops. This formula can be used in e.g. pest control and conservation biology, where it can complement sensitivity and elasticity analyses. The simplest of the necessary and sufficient conditions is that, for irreducible projection matrices, all paths from birth to reproduction have to pass through a common state. This state may be visible in the state representation for the chosen sampling time, but the passing may also occur in between sampling times, like a seed stage in the case of sampling just before flowering. Note that there may be more than one birth state, like when plants in their first year can already have different sizes at the sampling time. Also the common state may occur only later in life. However, in all cases \(R_0\) allows a simple interpretation as the expected number of new individuals that in the next generation enter the common state deriving from a single individual in this state. We end with pointing to some alternative algebraically simple quantities with properties similar to those of \(R_{0}\) that may sometimes be used to good effect in cases where no simple formula for \(R_{0}\) exists.

Keywords

Basic reproduction ratio Conservation Invasion Matrix models Population persistence \(R_{0}\) 

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

92D15 92D25 

Notes

Acknowledgments

C. R. received funding from the Vienna Science and Technology Fund (WWTF) through project MA07-015. J.A.J.M. benefited from the support of the Chaire Modélisation Mathématique et Biodiversité VEOLIA-École Polytechnique-MNHN-F.X.

References

  1. Caswell H (2001) Matrix Population Models, 2nd edn. Sinauer, USGoogle Scholar
  2. Cushing J, Yicang Z (1994) The net reproductive value and stability in matrix population models. Nat Res Model 8:297–333Google Scholar
  3. de-Camino-Beck T, Lewis MA (2007) A new method for calculating net reproductive rate from graph reduction with applications to the control of invasive species. Bull Math Biol 69:1341–1354MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. de-Camino-Beck T, Lewis MA (2008) On net reproductive rate and the timing of reproductive output. Am Nat 172:128–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Diekmann O, Heesterbeek JAP, Metz JAJ (1990) On the definition and the computation of the basic reproduction ratio \(R_{0}\) in models for infectious diseases in heterogeneous populations. J Math Biol 28:365–382MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Horn R, Johnson C (1985) Matrix Analysis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgezbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Hurford A, Cownden D, Day T (2010) Nex-generation tools for evolutionary analysis. J R Soc Interface 7:561–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Li C-K, Schneider H (2002) Applications of Perron-Frobenius theory to population dynamics. J Math Biol 44:450–462Google Scholar
  9. Mason S (1956) Feedback theory: further properties of signal flow graphs. In: Proceedings of IRE 44: 920–926Google Scholar
  10. Metz JAJ.: On the concept of individual in ecology and evolution. J Math Biol (submitted)Google Scholar
  11. Metz JAJ, Diekmann O (1986) The dynamics of physiologically structured populations, vol. 68 of Lecture Notes in Biomathematics. Springer Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  12. Metz JAJ, Klinkhamer PGL, de Jong TJ (2009) A different model to explain delayed germination. Evol Ecol Res 11:177–190Google Scholar
  13. Metz JAJ, Leimar O (2011) A simple fitness proxy for ESS calculations in structured populations with continuous traits, with applications to the evolution of haplo-diploids and genetic dimorphisms. J Biol Dyn 5:163–190Google Scholar
  14. Rueffler C, Metz JAJ, Van Dooren TJM (2012) What life cycle graphs can tell about the evolution of life histories. J Math Biol. doi: 10.1007/s00285-012-0509-x
  15. Weppler T, Stoll P, Stöcklin J (2006) The relative importance of sexual and clonal reproduction for population growth in the long-lived alpine plant geum reptans. J Ecol 94:869–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mathematics and BioSciences Group, Department of MathematicsUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
  2. 2.Mathematical Institute and Institute of BiologyLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Netherlands Centre for Biodiversity, NaturalisLeidenThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Evolution and Ecology Program, International Institute of Applied Systems AnalysisLaxenburgAustria

Personalised recommendations