Edge removal in random contact networks and the basic reproduction number
- 316 Downloads
- 9 Citations
Abstract
Understanding the effect of edge removal on the basic reproduction number \({\mathcal{R}_0}\) for disease spread on contact networks is important for disease management. The formula for the basic reproduction number \({\mathcal{R}_0}\) in random network SIR models of configuration type suggests that for degree distributions with large variance, a reduction of the average degree may actually increase \({\mathcal{R}_0}\). To understand this phenomenon, we develop a dynamical model for the evolution of the degree distribution under random edge removal, and show that truly random removal always reduces \({\mathcal{R}_0}\). The discrepancy implies that any increase in \({\mathcal{R}_0}\) must result from edge removal changing the network type, invalidating the use of the basic reproduction number formula for a random contact network. We further develop an epidemic model incorporating a contact network consisting of two groups of nodes with random intra- and inter-group connections, and derive its basic reproduction number. We then prove that random edge removal within either group, and between groups, always decreases the appropriately defined \({\mathcal{R}_0}\). Our models also allow an estimation of the number of edges that need to be removed in order to curtail an epidemic.
Keywords
Network SIR model Basic reproduction number Disease dynamics Edge removal Multi-group Network evolutionMathematics Subject Classification
92D30Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Ball F, Neal P (2008) Network epidemic models with two levels of mixing. Math Biosci 212: 69–87MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bekessy A, Bekessy P, Komlos J (1972) Asymptotic enumeration of regular matrices. Stud Sci Math Hung 7: 343–353MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Bender EA, Canfield ER (1978) The asymptotic number of labelled graphs with given degree sequences. J Comb Theory A 24: 296–307MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ellner SP, Guckenheimer J (2006) Dynamic models in biology. Princeton University Press, PrincetonMATHGoogle Scholar
- Gillespie DT (1976) A general method for numerically simulating the stochastic time evolution of coupled chemical reactions. J Comput Phys 22: 403–434MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gillespie DT (1977) Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. J Phys Chem 81: 2340–2361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kermack WO, McKendrick AG (1927) A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proc Roy Soc Lond A 115: 700–721MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lindquist J, Ma J, van den Driessche P, Willeboordse FH (2009) Network evolution by different rewiring schemes. Physica D 238: 370–378MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lindquist J, Ma J, van den Driessche P, Willeboorsde FH (2010) Effective degree network disease models. J Math Biol 62: 143–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- May RM, Anderson RM, Irwin ME (1988) The transmission dynamics of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 321: 565–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Miller JC (2011) A note on a paper by Erik Volz: SIR dynamics in random networks. J Math Biol 62: 349–358MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Newman MEJ (2002) Spread of epidemic disease on networks. Phys Rev E 66: 016128MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Newman MEJ, Strogatz SH, Watts DJ (2001) Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. Phys Rev E 64: 026118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pastor-Satorras R, Vespignani A (2002) Epidemic dynamics in finite size scale-free networks. Phys Rev E 65: 035108(R)Google Scholar
- van den Driessche P, Watmough J (2002) Reproduction numbers and sub-threshold endemic equilibria for compartmental models of disease transmission. Math Biosci 180: 29–48MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Volz EM (2008) SIR dynamics in random networks with heterogeneous connectivity. J Math Biol 56: 293–310MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar