Advertisement

Journal of Mathematical Biology

, Volume 65, Issue 5, pp 967–996 | Cite as

A finite-element model for healing of cutaneous wounds combining contraction, angiogenesis and closure

  • F. J. VermolenEmail author
  • E. Javierre
Open Access
Article

Abstract

A simplified finite-element model for wound healing is proposed. The model takes into account the sequential steps of dermal regeneration, wound contraction, angiogenesis and wound closure. An innovation in the present study is the combination of the aforementioned partially overlapping processes, which can be used to deliver novel insights into the process of wound healing, such as geometry related influences, as well as the influence of coupling between the various existing subprocesses on the actual healing behavior. The model confirms the clinical observation that epidermal closure proceeds by a crawling and climbing mechanism at the early stages, and by a stratification process in layers parallel to the skin surface at the later stages. The local epidermal oxygen content may play an important role here. The model can also be used to investigate the influence of local injection of hormones that stimulate partial processes occurring during wound healing. These insights can be used to improve wound healing treatments.

Keywords

Wound healing Finite-element method Wound closure Wound contraction Angiogenesis 

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

35L65 92C99 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The financial support by Agentschap, an agency within the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, in the framework of the IOP self-healing materials is gratefully acknowledged. This support enables the fruitful collaboration between the researchers from the Netherlands and Spain. E. Javierre gratefully acknowledges the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through the project DP12009- 07514.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. Adam JA (1999) A simplified model of wound healing (with particular reference to the critical size defect). Math Comput Model 30: 23–32MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold JS (2001) A simplified model of wound healing III: the critical size defect in three dimensions. Math Comput Model 34: 385–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balding D, McElwain DLS (1985) A mathematical model of tumour-induced capillary growth. J Theor Biol 114: 53–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dallon JC (2010) Multiscale modeling of cellular systems in biology. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 15: 24–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dallon JC, Ehrlich HP (2008) A review of fibroblast populated collagen lattices. Wound Repair Regen 16: 472–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. de Vries G, Hillen Th, Lewis M, Müller J, Schönfisch B (2006) A course in mathematical biology: quantitative modeling with mathematical and computational methods. SIAM, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  7. Escámez MJ, García M, Larcher F, Meana A, Nuñoz E, Jorcano JL, Del Rio M (2004) An in vivo model of wound healing in genetically modified skin-humanized mice. J Investig Dermatol 123: 1182–1191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Friesel RE, Maciang T (1995) Molecular mechanisms of angiogenesis: fibroblast growth factor signal transduction. FASEB J 9: 919–925Google Scholar
  9. Gaffney EA, Pugh K, Maini PK (2002) Investigating a simple model for cutaneous wound healing angiogenesis. J Math Biol 45(4): 337–374MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Graner F, Glazier J (1992) Simulation of biological cell sorting using a two-dimensional extended Potts model. Phys Rev Lett 69: 2013–2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hogea CS, Murray BT, Sethian JA (2006) Simulating complex tumor dynamics from avascular to vascular growth using a general level-set method. J Math Biol 53: 86–134MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Javierre E, Vermolen FJ, Vuik C, van der Zwaag S (2008) Numerical modeling of epidermal wound healing. In: Kunisch K, Of F, Steinbach O (eds) Numerical mathematics and advanced applications. Proceedings of ENUMATH 2007, Berlin. Springer, Berlin, pp 83–90Google Scholar
  13. Javierre E, Moreo P, Doblaré M, García-Aznar MJ (2009a) Computational modelling of wound contraction. In: Proceedings of the Congreso de Métodos Numéricos en Ingeniería 2009, Barcelona. SEMNIGoogle Scholar
  14. Javierre E, Vermolen FJ, Vuik C, van der Zwaag S (2009b) A mathematical analysis of physiological and morphological aspects of wound closure. J Math Biol 59: 605–630MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lamme EN (1999) Artificial skin and tissue regeneration. Thesis, The University of Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  16. Laplante AF, Germain L, Auger FA, Moulin V (2001) Mechanisms of wound reepithelialization: hints from a tissue-engineered reconstructed skin to long-standing questions. FASEB J 15: 2377–2382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. MacDougall JDB, McCabe M (1967) Diffusion coefficient of oxygen through tissues. Nature 215: 1173–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maggelakis SA (2003) A mathematical model for tissue replacement during epidermal wound healing. Appl Math Model 27(3): 189–196zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maggelakis SA (2004) Modeling the role of angiogenesis in epidermal wound healing. Discret Contin Syst 4: 267–273MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mantzaris NV, Webb S, Othmer HG (2004) Mathematical modeling of tumor-induced angiogenesis. J Math Biol 49: 111–187MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Merks MH, Koolwijk P (2009) Modeling morphogenesis in silico and in vitro: towards quantitative, predictive, cell-based modeling. Math Model Nat Phenom 4(4): 149–171MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mi Q, Swigon D, Riviere B, Cetin S, Vodorotz Y, Hackam D (2007) One-dimensional elastic continuum model of enterocyte layer migration. Biophys J 93: 3745–3752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Murray JD (2003) On the mechanochemical theory of biological pattern formation with application to vasculogenesis. Biol Model 326: 239–252Google Scholar
  24. Murray JD (2004) Mathematical biology II: spatial models and biomedical applications. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Olsen L, Sherratt JA, Maini PK (1995) A mechanochemical model for adult dermal wound closure and the permanence of the contracted tissue displacement role. J Theor Biol 177: 113–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Paddock HN, Schultz GS, Mast BA (2003) Methods in reepithalization. In: DiPietro LA, Burns AI (eds) Wound healing methods and protocols. Humana Press Inc., TotowaGoogle Scholar
  27. Pettet GJ, Byrne HM, McElwain DLS, Norbury J (1996) A model of wound healing angiogenesis in soft tissue. Math Biosci 136: 35–63zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Plank MJ, Sleeman BD (2003) A reinforced random walk model of tumour angiogenesis and anti-angiogenic strategies. Math Med Biol 20: 135–181zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Plank MJ, Sleeman BD (2004) Lattice and non-lattice models of tumour angiogenesis. Bull Math Biol 66: 1785–1819MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rossiter H, Barresi C, Pammer J, Rendl M, Haigh J, Wagner EF, Tschachler E (2004) Loss of vascular endothelial growth factor A activity in murine epidermal keratinocytes delays wound healing and inhibits tumor formation. Cancer Res 64: 3508–3516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schugart RC, Friedman A, Zhao R, Sen CK (2008) Wound angiogenesis as a function of tissue oxygen tension: a mathematical model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(7): 2628–2633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sherratt JA, Murray JD (1991) Mathematical analysis of a basic model for epidermal wound healing. J Math Biol 29: 389–404zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stadelman WK, Digenis AG, Tobin GR (1997) Physiology and healing dynamics of chronic cutaneous wounds. Am J Surg 176(2): 265–385Google Scholar
  34. Stoletov KV, Ratcliffe KE, Terman BI (2002) Fibroblast growth factor receptor substrate 2 participates in vascular endothelial growth factor-induced signaling. FASEB J 16: 1283–1285Google Scholar
  35. Swigon D, Arciero J, Mi Q, Hackam D (2010) Continuum elastic model of epithelial sheet migration. Biophys J 93(3) (to appear)Google Scholar
  36. Szpaderska AM, DiPietro LA (2003) In vitro matrigel angiogenesis model. Methods Mol Med 78(1): 311–315Google Scholar
  37. Tranquillo RT, Murray JD (1992) Continuum model of fibroblast-driven wound contraction inflammation-mediation. J Theor Biol 158(2): 135–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vermolen FJ (2009) A simplified finite-element model for tissue regeneration with angiogenesis. ASCE J Eng Mech 135(5): 450–460MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vermolen FJ, Adam JA (2007) A finite-element model for epidermal wound healing. In: Computational Science, ICCS 2007. Springer, Berlin, pp 70–77Google Scholar
  40. Vermolen FJ, Javierre E (2009a) On the construction of analytic solutions for a diffusion–reaction equation with a discontinuous switch mechanism. J Comput Appl Math 231: 983–1003MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vermolen FJ, Javierre E (2009b) A suite of continuum models for different aspects in wound healing. In: Gefen A (ed) Bioengineering research of chronic wounds, studies in mechanobiology, tissue engineering and biomaterials. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  42. Vermolen FJ, Javierre E (2010) Computer simulations from a finite-element model for wound contraction and closure. J Tissue Viability 19: 43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wearing HJ, Sherratt JD (2000) Keratinocyte growth factor signalling: a mathematical model of dermal–epidermal interaction in epidermal wound healing. Math Biosci 165: 41–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Xue C, Friedman A, Sen CK (2009) A mathematical model of ischemic cutaneous wounds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(39): 16783–16787CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Delft Institute of Applied MathematicsDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Centro Universitario de la Defensa-AGMZaragozaSpain
  3. 3.Aragón Institute of Engineering Research (I3A)Universidad de ZaragozaZaragozaSpain

Personalised recommendations