Journal of Mathematical Biology

, Volume 64, Issue 1–2, pp 291–317 | Cite as

The effect of recurrent mutation on the linkage disequilibrium under a selective sweep

Article

Abstract

A selective sweep describes the reduction of diversity due to strong positive selection. If the mutation rate to a selectively beneficial allele is sufficiently high, Pennings and Hermisson (Mol Biol Evol 23(5):1076–1084, 2006a) have shown, that it becomes likely, that a selective sweep is caused by several individuals. Such an event is called a soft sweep and the complementary event of a single origin of the beneficial allele, the classical case, a hard sweep. We give analytical expressions for the linkage disequilibrium (LD) between two neutral loci linked to the selected locus, depending on the recurrent mutation to the beneficial allele, measured by D and \({\widehat{\sigma_D^2}}\), a quantity introduced by Ohta and Kimura (Genetics 63(1):229–238, 1969), and conclude that the LD-pattern of a soft sweep differs substantially from that of a hard sweep due to haplotype structure. The analytical results are compared with simulations.

Keywords

Star-like approximation Genealogy Strong positive selection Haplotype structure 

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

92D15 60J80 60J85 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

285_2011_411_MOESM1_ESM.nb (40 kb)
ESM 1 (NB 41 kb)

References

  1. Barton NH, Etheridge AM, Sturm AK (2004) Coalescence in a random background. Ann Appl Probab 14(2): 754–785CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. Durrett R, Schweinsberg J (2004) Approximating selective sweeps. Theo Pop Biol 66(2): 129–138CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Etheridge AM, Pfaffelhuber P, Wakolbinger A (2006) An approximate sampling formula under genetic hitchhiking. Ann Appl Probab 16: 685–729CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. Ewing G, Hermisson J (2010) Msms: a coalescent simulation program including recombination, demographic structure, and selection at a single locus. Bioinformatics 26(16): 2064–2065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hermisson J, Pennings P (2005) Soft sweeps: molecular population genetics of adaptation from standing genetic variation. Genetics 169(4): 2335–2352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hermisson J, Pfaffelhuber P (2008) The pattern of genetic hitchhiking under recurrent mutation. Elec J Prob 13(68): 2069–2106MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. Karasov T, Messer PW, Petrov DA (2010) Evidence that adaptation in Drosophila is not limited by mutation at single sites. PLoS Genet 6(6): e1000924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kim Y, Nielsen R (2004) Linkage disequilibrium as a signature of selective sweeps. Genetics 167: 1513–1524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kurtz TG (1971) Limit theorems for sequences of jump markov processes approximation ordinary differential processes. J Appl Prob 8: 344–356CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Maynard Smith J, Haigh J (1974) The hitch-hiking effect of a favorable gene. Gen Res 23: 23–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McVean GA (2007) The structure of linkage disequilibrium around a selective sweep. Genetics 175: 1395–1406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nair S, Nash D, Sudimack D, Jaidee A, Barends M, Uhlemann AC, Krishna S, Nosten F, Anderson TJ (2007) Recurrent gene amplification and soft selective sweeps during evolution of multidrug resistance in malaria parasites. Mol Biol Evol 24(2): 562–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ohta T, Kimura M (1969) Linkage disequilibrium at steady state determined by random genetic drift and recurrent mutation. Genetics 63(1): 229–238Google Scholar
  14. Pennings P, Hermisson J (2006a) Soft sweeps II—molecular population genetics of adaptation from recurrent mutation or migration. Mol Biol Evol 23(5): 1076–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pennings P, Hermisson J (2006b) Soft sweeps III: the signature of positive selection from recurrent mutation. PLoS Genetics 2(12): 1998–2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pfaffelhuber P, Lehnert A, Stephan W (2008) Linkage disequilibrium under genetic hitchhiking in finite populations. Genetics 179: 527–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pfaffelhuber P, Studeny A (2007) Approximating genealogies for partially linked neutral loci under a selective sweep. J Math Biol 55: 299–330CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. Pritchard JK, Pickrell JK, Coop G (2010) The genetics of human adaptation: hard sweeps, soft sweeps, and polygenic adaptation. Curr Biol 20(4): 208–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Scheinfeldt LB, Biswas S, Madeoy J, Connelly CF, Schadt EE, Akey JM (2009) Population genomic analysis of ALMS1 in humans reveals a surprisingly complex evolutionary history. Mol Biol Evol 26(6): 1357–1367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schlenke TA, Begun DJ (2005) Linkage disequilibrium and recent selection at three immunity receptor loci in Drosophila simulans. Genetics 169(4): 2013–2022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Song Y, Song J (2007) Analytic computation of the expectation of the linkage disequilibrium coefficient r 2. Theo Pop Biol 71: 49–60CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Stephan W, Song YS, Langley CH (2006) The hitchhiking effect on linkage disequilibrium between linked neutral loci. Genetics 172(4): 2647–2663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tishkoff SA, Reed FA, Ranciaro A, Voight BF, Babbitt CC, Silverman JS, Powell K, Mortensen HM, Hirbo JB, Osman M, Ibrahim M, Omar SA, Lema G, Nyambo TB, Ghori J, Bumpstead S, Pritchard JK, Wray GA, Deloukas P (2007) Convergent adaptation of human lactase persistence in Africa and Europe. Nat Genet 39: 31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Albert-Ludwigs-University FreiburgEckerstraße 1FreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations