This paper is concerned with SIR (susceptible → infected → removed) household epidemic models in which the infection response may be either mild or severe, with the type of response also affecting the infectiousness of an individual. Two different models are analysed. In the first model, the infection status of an individual is predetermined, perhaps due to partial immunity, and in the second, the infection status of an individual depends on the infection status of its infector and on whether the individual was infected by a within- or between-household contact. The first scenario may be modelled using a multitype household epidemic model, and the second scenario by a model we denote by the infector-dependent-severity household epidemic model. Large population results of the two models are derived, with the focus being on the distribution of the total numbers of mild and severe cases in a typical household, of any given size, in the event that the epidemic becomes established. The aim of the paper is to investigate whether it is possible to determine which of the two underlying explanations is causing the varying response when given final size household outbreak data containing mild and severe cases. We conduct numerical studies which show that, given data on sufficiently many households, it is generally possible to discriminate between the two models by comparing the Kullback–Leibler divergence for the two fitted models to these data.
Household epidemic model Infector dependent severity Kullback–Leibler divergence Multitype epidemic Varying infection response Final outcome data
Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Ball FG, Lyne OD (2010) Statistical inference for epidemics among a population of households. Under revisionGoogle Scholar
Ball FG, Britton T, Lyne OD (2004) Stochastic multitype epidemics in a community of households: Estimation of threshold parameter R* and secure vaccination coverage. Biometrika 91: 345–362MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker NG, Hall R (1996) Immunization levels for preventing epidemics in a community of households made up of individuals of various types. Math Biosci 132: 205–216zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop YMM, Feinberg SE, Holland PW (1975) Discrete multivariate statistics. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Britton T, Becker NG (2000) Estimating the immunity coverage required to prevent epidemics in a community of households. Biostatistics 1: 389–402zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrat F, Vergu E, Ferguson NM, Lemaitre M, Cauchemez S, Leach S, Valleron A-J (2008) Time lines of infection and disease in human influenza: a review of volunteer challenge studies. Am J Epidemiol 167: 775–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ethier SN, Kurtz TG (1986) Markov processes: characterization and convergence. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
Ferguson NM, Cummings DAT, Cauchemez S, Fraser C, Riley S, Meeyai A, Iamsirithaworn S, Burke DS (2005) Strategies for containing an emerging influenza pandemic in Southeast Asia. Nature 437: 209–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeling MJ, Rohani P (2008) Modeling infectious diseases in humans and animals. Princeton University Press, PrincetonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
Leroy EM, Baize S, Debre P, Lansoud-Soukate J, Mavoungou E (2001) Early immune responses accompanying human asymptomatic Ebola infections. Clin Exp Immunol 124: 453–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangada MNM, Igarashi A (1998) Molecular and in vitro analysis of eight dengue type 2 viruses isolated from patients exhibiting different disease severities. Virology 244: 458–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar