FR3D: finding local and composite recurrent structural motifs in RNA 3D structures
New methods are described for finding recurrent three-dimensional (3D) motifs in RNA atomic-resolution structures. Recurrent RNA 3D motifs are sets of RNA nucleotides with similar spatial arrangements. They can be local or composite. Local motifs comprise nucleotides that occur in the same hairpin or internal loop. Composite motifs comprise nucleotides belonging to three or more different RNA strand segments or molecules. We use a base-centered approach to construct efficient, yet exhaustive search procedures using geometric, symbolic, or mixed representations of RNA structure that we implement in a suite of MATLAB programs, “Find RNA 3D” (FR3D). The first modules of FR3D preprocess structure files to classify base-pair and -stacking interactions. Each base is represented geometrically by the position of its glycosidic nitrogen in 3D space and by the rotation matrix that describes its orientation with respect to a common frame. Base-pairing and base-stacking interactions are calculated from the base geometries and are represented symbolically according to the Leontis/Westhof basepairing classification, extended to include base-stacking. These data are stored and used to organize motif searches. For geometric searches, the user supplies the 3D structure of a query motif which FR3D uses to find and score geometrically similar candidate motifs, without regard to the sequential position of their nucleotides in the RNA chain or the identity of their bases. To score and rank candidate motifs, FR3D calculates a geometric discrepancy by rigidly rotating candidates to align optimally with the query motif and then comparing the relative orientations of the corresponding bases in the query and candidate motifs. Given the growing size of the RNA structure database, it is impossible to explicitly compute the discrepancy for all conceivable candidate motifs, even for motifs with less than ten nucleotides. The screening algorithm that we describe finds all candidate motifs whose geometric discrepancy with respect to the query motif falls below a user-specified cutoff discrepancy. This technique can be applied to RMSD searches. Candidate motifs identified geometrically may be further screened symbolically to identify those that contain particular basepair types or base-stacking arrangements or that conform to sequence continuity or nucleotide identity constraints. Purely symbolic searches for motifs containing user-defined sequence, continuity and interaction constraints have also been implemented. We demonstrate that FR3D finds all occurrences, both local and composite and with nucleotide substitutions, of sarcin/ricin and kink-turn motifs in the 23S and 5S ribosomal RNA 3D structures of the H. marismortui 50S ribosomal subunit and assigns the lowest discrepancy scores to bona fide examples of these motifs. The search algorithms have been optimized for speed to allow users to search the non-redundant RNA 3D structure database on a personal computer in a matter of minutes.
Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)92C40 05C85
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 6.Bourne P.E., Addess K.J., Bluhm W.F., Chen L., Deshpande N., Feng Z., Fleri W., Green R., Merino-Ott J.C., Townsend-Merino W., Weissig H., Westbrook J. and Berman H.M. (2004). The distribution and query systems of the RCSB Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 32(Database issue): D223–D225 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Deshpande N., Addess K.J., Bluhm W.F., Merino-Ott J.C., Townsend-Merino W., Zhang Q., Knezevich C., Xie L., Chen L., Feng Z., Green R.K., Flippen-Anderson J.L., Westbrook J., Berman H.M. and Bourne P.E. (2005). The RCSB Protein Data Bank: a redesigned query system and relational database based on the mmCIF schema. Nucleic Acids Res. 33(Database issue): D233–D237 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Francois B., Russell R.J., Murray J.B., Aboul-ela F., Masquida B., Vicens Q. and Westhof E. (2005). Crystal structures of complexes between aminoglycosides and decoding A site oligonucleotides: role of the number of rings and positive charges in the specific binding leading to miscoding. Nucleic. Acids Res. 33(17): 5677–5690 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Golub G.H. and Van Loan C.F. (1996). Matrix computations, third edn Johns Hopkins Studies in the Mathematical Sciences. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore Google Scholar
- 28.Leontis, N., Altman, R., Berman, H., Brenner, S.E., Brown, J., Engelke, D., Harvey, S.C., Holbrook, S.R., Jossinet, F., Lewis, S.E., Major, F., Mathews, D.H., Richardson, J.S., Williamson, J.R.E.W.: The RNA ontology consortium: An open invitation to the rna community. RNA 12 (2006)Google Scholar
- 35.Major, F., Thibault, P.: In: T.~Lengauer (ed.) Bioinformatics: From Genomes to Therapies, pp. 491–539. Wiley, New York (2006)Google Scholar
- 38.Murray L.J., Richardson J.S., Arendall W.B. and Richardson D.C. (2005). RNA backbone rotamers-finding your way in seven dimensions. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 33(Pt 3): 485–487 Google Scholar
- 40.Olson W.K., Bansal M., Burley S.K., Dickerson R.E., Gerstein M., Harvey S.C., Heinemann U., Lu X.J., Neidle S., Shakked Z., Sklenar H., Suzuki M., Tung C.S., Westhof E., Wolberger C. and Berman H.M. (2001). A standard reference frame for the description of nucleic acid base-pair geometry. J. Mol. Biol. 313(1): 229–237 CrossRefGoogle Scholar