Journal of Mathematical Biology

, Volume 49, Issue 4, pp 391–432

The effect of a non-uniform turning kernel on ant trail morphology

  • Andrew D. Vincent
  • Mary R. Myerscough
Article

Abstract.

An ordinary differential equation model is constructed for the formation of pheromone trails by ants on a pre-determined network. At each junction of the trails the probability that an ant will turn through any particular angle is given by a turning kernel. We prove analytically using analogies with thermodynamics that turning behaviour determines trail morphology when the turning kernel is steep. We conjecture that this is also true in general for non-uniform turning kernels and present numerical simulations as evidence. Using this conjecture we show the existence of three types of collective foraging: individuals exploring without the use of a trail network, and two distinct types of trail networks; one that consists of low pheromone concentration trails that bend, branch and dissipate and one that consists of high pheromone concentration, straight, unbranched trails. We show that the form of the pheromone response function is crucial in determining the existence and stability of the steady states corresponding to these three foraging strategies, and examine the bifurcations between different trail morphologies as a function of turning kernel steepness for a particular response function.

Key words or phrases:

Linear stability analysis Ant behaviour Mathematical modelling Self-organisation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aron, S., Pasteels, J.M., Deneubourg, J.L.: Trail-laying behaviour during exploratory recruitment in the Argentine ant, Iridomyrmex humilis (Mayr). Biol. Behav. 14, 207–217 (1989)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beckers, R., Deneubourg, J.L., Goss, S.: Trails and U-turns in the selection of a path by the ant Lasius niger. J. Theor. Biol. 159, 397–415 (1992)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beckers, R., Deneubourg, J.L., Goss, S., Pasteels, J.M.: Collective decision making through food recruitment. Insectes Sociaux, Paris 37 (3), 258–267 (1990)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bossert, W.H., Wilson, E.O.: The analysis of olfactory communication among animals. J. Theor. Biol. 5, 443–469 (1963)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bradshaw, J.W.S., Howse, P.E.: Sociochemicals of Ants. In: Bell, W.J. and Cardé, R.T. (eds) Chemical Ecology of Insects. Chapman and Hall, London (1984)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Camazine, S., Sneyd, J.: A model of collective nectar source selection by honey bees. J. Theor. Biol. 149, 547–571 (1991)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cox, M., Myerscough, M.R.: A flexible model of foraging by a honey bee colony: The effects of individual behaviour on foraging success. J. Theor. Biol., 223, 179–197Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deneubourg, J.L., Aron, S., Goss, S., Pasteels, J.M.: The self-organising exploratory pattern of the Argentine Ant. J. Insect Behav. 3(2), 159–168 (1990)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deneubourg, J.L., Goss, S., Franks, N., Pasteels, J.M.: The blind leading the blind: chemically mediated mophogenesis and Army Ant raid patterns. J. Insect Behav. 2, 719–725 (1989)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Edelstein-Keshet, L.: Simple models for trail-following behaviour: trunk trails versus individual foragers. J. Math. Biol. 32, 303–328 (1994)MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Edelstein-Keshet, L., Ermentrout, G.B.: Models for contact-mediated pattern formation: cells that form parallel arrays. J. Math. Biol. 29, 33–58 (1990)MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Franks, N.R., Gomez, N., Goss, S., Deneubourg, J.L.: The blind leading the blind in Army Ant raid patterns: testing a model of self-organization (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Insect Behav. 4, 583–607 (1991)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heinrich, B.: The mechanisms and energetics of honeybee swarm temperature regulation. J. exp. Biol. 91, 25–55 (1981)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Millonas, M.M.: A connectionist type model of self-organized foraging and emergent behavior in ant swarms. J. Theor. Biol. 159, 529–552 (1992)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Millonas, M.: Swarms, Phase Transitions and Collective Intelligence. In: Langton, C.G. (ed.) Artificial Life III: Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, Proc Vol. XVII, Addison-Wesley (1994)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mogilner, A., Edelstein-Keshet, L.: Selecting a common direction. J. Math. Biol. 33, 619–660 (1995)MATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Myerscough, M.R.: A simple model for thermoregulation in honeybee swarms. J. Theor. Biol. 162, 381–393 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nicolis, S.C., Deneubourg, J.L.: Emerging patterns and food recruitment in ants: an analytical study. J. Theor. Biol. 198, 575–592 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    O’Toole, D.V., Robinson, P.A., Myerscough, M.R.: Self-organized criticality in termite architecture: a role for crowding in ensuring ordered nest expansion. J. Thoer. Biol. 198, 305–327 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pasteels, J.M.P., Deneubourg, J.L., Verhaeghe, J.C., Boeve, J.L., Quinet, Y.: Orientation along terrestrial trails by ants. In: Payne, T., Birch, M. (eds) Mechanisms in Insect Olfaction, 131–138. Oxford Univ. Press (1986)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rauch, E.M., Millonas, M.M., Chialvo, D.R.: Pattern formation and functionality in swarm models. Phys. Lett. A 207, 185–193 (1995)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schneirla, T.C., Reyes, A.Y.: Rading and related behaviour in two surface adapted species of the old world doryline ant Aenictus. Animal Behaviour 14, 132–148 (1966)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schweitzer, F., Lau, K., Family, F.: Active random walkers simulate trunk trail formation by ants. Biosys 41, 153–166 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Seneta, E.: Non-negative Matrices and Markov Chains. Springer-Verlag, New York (1980)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Theraulaz, G., Bonabeau, E.: Modelling the collective building of complex architectures in social insects with lattice swarms. J. Theor. Biol. 177, 381–400 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Watmough, J., Camazine, S.: Self-organized thermoregulation of honeybee clusters. J. Theor. Biol. 176, 391–402 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Watmough, J., Edelstein-Keshet, L.: A one-dimensional model of trail propagation by army ants. J. Math. Biol. 33, 459–476 (1995a)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Watmough, J., Edelstein-Keshet, L.: Modelling the formation of trail networks by foraging ants. J. Theor. Biol. 176, 357–371 (1995b)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew D. Vincent
    • 1
  • Mary R. Myerscough
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of SydneyNew South WalesAustralia

Personalised recommendations