Current Microbiology

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 261–265 | Cite as

Enterobacter kobei sp. nov., a new species of the family Enterobacteriaceae resembling Enterobacter cloacae

  • Yoshimasa Kosako
  • Kazumichi Tamura
  • Riichi Sakazaki
  • Kanzi Miki


The name Enterobacter kobei sp. nov. is proposed for a group of organisms referred to as NIH Group 21 at the National Institute of Health, Tokyo. The members of this species are Gram-negative, motile rods conforming to the definition of the family Enterobacteriaceae. The DNA relatedness of 23 strains of NIH Group 21 to the representative proposed as the type strain of this species averaged 82% at 70°C, whereas the relatedness to other species within the family Enterobacteriaceae was less than 42%. Because the phenotypic resemblance to Enterobacter cloacae is very close and the DNA relatedness (12–42%) is closer to species of the genus Enterobacter than to other species of the family, the members of NIH Group 21 were placed in the genus Enterobacter. Close phenotypic and genetic relationships were also found between NIH Group 21 and a member of a group of organisms referred to as Enteric Group 69 at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA. It is suggested that the latter could be regarded as a subspecific rank of E. kobei, though this is subject to study of further strains. The majority of strains of E. kobei were isolated from clinical specimens. A culture of the type strain (NIH 1485-79) has been deposited in the Japan Collection of Microorganisms as JCM 8580.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Cowan ST (1974) Cowan and Steel’s Manual for the identification of medical bacteria, 2nd ed. London: Cambridge Univ. PressGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ewing WH (1986) Edwards and Ewing’s Identification of Enterobacteriaceae, 4th ed. New York: ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Farmer JJ (1994) Enterobacteriaceae. In: Murray PR, Baron EJ, Pfaller MA, Tenover FC, Yolken RH (eds), Manual of clinical microbiology, 6th ed. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Microbiology, pp 438–449Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moller V (1954) Distribution of amino acid decarboxylases in Enterobacteriaceae. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 35: 259–277PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Owen RJ, Hill LR, Lapage SP (1969) Determination of DNA base composition from melting profiles in dilute buffers. Biopolymers 7: 503–516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sakazaki R, Namioka S (1957) Biochemical studies on Voges-Proskauer positive enteric bacteria. Jpn J Exp Med 27: 273–282PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sakazaki R, Tamura K, Kosako Y, Yoshizaki E (1989) Klebsiella ornithinolytica sp. nov., formerly known as ornithine-positive Klebsiella oxytoca. Curr Microbiol 18: 201–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoshimasa Kosako
    • 1
  • Kazumichi Tamura
    • 2
  • Riichi Sakazaki
    • 2
  • Kanzi Miki
    • 3
  1. 1.Japan Collection of MicroorganismsThe Institute of Physical and Chemical Research (RIKEN)SaitamaJapan
  2. 2.National Institute of Health, JapanTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Kobe City General Hospital, NakamachiHyogoJapan

Personalised recommendations