Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Purified Terephthalic Acid Wastewater Treatment Using Modified Two-Stage UASB Bioreactor Systems

Abstract

Microbial community dynamics and PTA wastewater degradation performance of sequentially connected two-stage upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) bioreactors have been studied for 225 days. The working volume of acidogenic (R1) and methanogenic reactors (R2) have sixfold differences. Thus, the reactors operated under different hydraulic retention time (HRT) conditions, which are preferential for PTA wastewater content. Archeal and bacterial profiles of granules were analyzed with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and real-time quantitative PCR (Q-PCR) techniques. According to high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) results, 4-Carboxybenzaldehyde (4-CBA) and acetic acid (AA) completely degraded in the first stage, whereas terephthalate (TA) and p-toluic acid (p-TA) degradation ratios were 90% and 47% in the second stage, respectively. The methane content of the UASB reactor was determined as 76% by gas chromatography (GC) analysis. Microbial community analysis indicated that the members of hydrogenotrophic methanogen groups Methanobacteriales and Methanomicrobiales were dominantly responsible for methane production throughout the process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. 1.

    Kleerebezem R, Pol LWH, Lettinga G (1999) Anaerobic biodegradability of phthalic acid isomers and related compounds. Biodegradation 10:63–73

  2. 2.

    Kleerebezem R, Beckers J, Pol LWH, Lettinga G (2005) High rate treatment of terephthalic acid production wastewater in a two-stage anaerobic bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 91:169–179

  3. 3.

    Ma K, Li X, Wang K, Ren Y, Chu Z, Zhang J (2017) Role of temperature on microbial community profiles in an anaerobic bioreactor for treating PTA wastewater. Chem Eng J 308:256–263

  4. 4.

    Jafarinejad S (2017) Recent developments in the application of sequencing batch reactor (SBR) technology for the petroleum industry wastewater treatment. Chem Int 3(3):342–350

  5. 5.

    Ramteke LP, Gogate PR (2016) Treatment of real industrial wastewater using the combined approach of advanced oxidation followed by aerobic oxidation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(10):9712–9729

  6. 6.

    Yurtsever A, Calimlioglu B, Sahinkaya E (2017) Impact of SRT on the efficiency and microbial community of sequential anaerobic and aerobic membrane bioreactors for the treatment of textile industry wastewater. Chem Eng J 314:378–387

  7. 7.

    Liu M, Wang S, Nobu MK, Bocher BTW, Kaley SA, Liu WT (2017) Impacts of biostimulation and bioaugmentation on the performance and microbial ecology in methanogenic reactors treating purified terephthalic acid wastewater. Water Res 122:308–316

  8. 8.

    Narihiro T, Nobu MK, Mei R, Liu WT (2015) Microbial community involved in anaerobic purified terephthalic acid treatment process. In: anaerobic biotechnology: environmental protection and resource recovery. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 31–48

  9. 9.

    Kim JH, Woo SH, Lee MW, Park JM (2012) Sequential treatment of PTA wastewater in a two-stage UASB process: Focusing on p-toluate degradation and microbial distribution. Water Res 46:2805–2814

  10. 10.

    Li XK, Ma KL, Meng LW, Zhang J, Wang K (2014) Performance and microbial community profiles in an anaerobic reactor treating with simulated PTA wastewater: from mesophilic to thermophilic temperature. Water Res 61:57–66

  11. 11.

    Tabatabaei M, Rahim RA, Abdullah N, Wrighte A, Shirai Y, Sakai K, Sulaiman A, Hassan MA (2010) Importance of the methanogenic archaea populations in anaerobic wastewater treatments. Process Biochem 45:1214–1225

  12. 12.

    Daglioglu ST, Karabey B, Ozdemir G, Azbar N (2019) CO2 utilization via a novel anaerobic bioprocess configuration with simulated gas mixture and real stack gas samples. Environ Technol 40(6):742–748

  13. 13.

    Yu Y, Lee C, Kim J, Hwang S (2005) Group-specific primer and probe sets to detect methanogenic communities using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Biotechnol Bioengineer 89(6):670–679

  14. 14.

    Shannon KE, Lee DY, Trevors JT, Beaudette LA (2007) Application of real-time quantitative PCR for the detection of selected bacterial pathogens during municipal wastewater treatment. Sci Total Environ 382(1):121–129

  15. 15.

    Lee C, Kim J, Shin SG, Hwang S (2006) Absolute and relative QPCR quantification of plasmid copy number in Escherichia coli. J Biotechnol 123:273–280

  16. 16.

    Fajardo C, Guyot JP, Macarie H, Monroy O (1997) Inhibition of anaerobic digestion by terephthalic acid and its aromatic by products. Water Sci Technol 36(6–7):83–90

  17. 17.

    Joung Y, Lee HW, Choi H, Lee MW, Park JM (2009) Influences of organic loading disturbances on the performance of anaerobic filter process to treat purified terephthalic acid wastewater. Biores Technol 100(8):2457–2461

  18. 18.

    Intanoo P, Chaimongkol P, Chavadej S (2016) Hydrogen and methane production from cassava wastewater using two-stage upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors (UASB) with an emphasis on maximum hydrogen production. Int J Hydrog Energy 41(14):6107–6114

  19. 19.

    Kendall M, Boone D (2006) The order Methanosarcinales. In: Dworkin M et al. (eds.), The Prokaryotes, Vol. 3, 3rd ed. Springer, New York, pp 244–256.

  20. 20.

    Mor R, Sivan A (2008) Biofilm formation and partial biodegradation of polystyrene by the actinomycete Rhodococcus ruber. Biodegradation 19(6):851–858

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) under Grant No. 113Y002 for the financial support of this study. The data presented in this article was produced within the project above; however, it is only the authors of this article who are responsible for the results and discussions made herein. The authors also wish to thank Ege University Scientific Research Fund under the Grant No. 2013FEN08 and Ege University Science and Technology Center (Grant No: 2014-BIL-007) for the financial support of this study.

Author information

Correspondence to Guven Ozdemir.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 32 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alpay, T., Karabey, B., Azbar, N. et al. Purified Terephthalic Acid Wastewater Treatment Using Modified Two-Stage UASB Bioreactor Systems. Curr Microbiol (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-020-01913-8

Download citation