Advertisement

Induction of Systemic Resistance in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris by Antagonistic Rhizobacteria in Assistance with Native Mesorhizobium

  • Suman KumariEmail author
  • Veena Khanna
Article
  • 39 Downloads

Abstract

In the present study five potent rhizobacterial antagonists of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris alone and in combination with Mesorhizobium (M) were evaluated for their potential to elicit the defence response reactions to reduce the total loss of plants and enhance the growth of two chickpea cultivars i.e. resistant GPF-2 and susceptible JG-41. Observations revealed that maximum phenolic, peroxidase (PO) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) activity was induced after 30th day of germination. Maximum phenol concentration of 745.8 and 724.1 μg/gfw root tissues was recorded by Ps45 when co-inoculated with Mesorhizobium in both the varieties i.e. GPF-2 and JG-41 respectively. Isolates Ps45, Ps47 and Ps44 were found most promising to induce PO and PPO activity, in combination with Mesorhizobium and recorded superior over the fungicide with respect to negative control. Similar results were recorded for the phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL), maximally induced on 20th day after germination, where dual inoculation of Ps44+M and Ps45+M induced 57.0 and 54.2 nmol of cinnamic acid min−1 gfw−1 in GPF-2. However in case of JG-41, Ps45 and Ba1a exhibited highest PAL activity of 54.2 and 41.4 nmol of cinnamic acid min−1 gfw−1. Malonic aldehyde concentration in stem tissues at 30th day revealed that lipid peroxidation was effectively reduced in rhizobacterial treated plants compared to fungicide and negative control, signifying the role of antagonistic plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in reducing the stress and enhancing the plant’s defence response to reduce the disease incidence and thus improving the plant growth and yield. Moreover the dual inoculations were observed superior over the fungicide treatment as well as single inoculations in terms of growth (root/shoot length and weight), signifying the synergistic effect of screened antagonists and native Mesorhizobium in suppressing the pathogen and thereby enhancing the plant growth.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The present investigation was conducted in the Pulses section, Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University. Further assistance was provided by Department of Microbiology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India. First author is also thankful to Department of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi for providing financial assistance as Doctoral (INSPIRE) fellowship.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Abdeljalil NOB, Vallance J, Gerbore J, Rey P, Remadi MD (2016) Bio-suppression of Sclerotinia Stem Rot of Tomato and Biostimulation of Plant Growth Using Tomato associated Rhizobacteria. J Plant Pathol Microbiol. 7(2):1–11Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahmed M, Khanm MS (2009) Effect of insecticide-tolerant and plant growth-promoting Mesorhizobium on the performance of chickpea grown in insecticide stressed alluvial soils. J Crop Sci Biotechnol 2(4):217–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ali M, Kumar S (2005) Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) research in India, accomplishment and future strategies. Indian J Agric Sci 75(3):125–133Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anonymous (2015) Commodity profile of pulses—March 2015. Department of Agriculture and Co-operation, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of IndiaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ardura A, Ana LR, Vazquez EG (2013) Genetic detection of Pseudomonas spp. in commercial amazonian fish. Int J Environ Res Public Health 10:3954–3966PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ashraf SM, Khan TA, Hasan S (2005) Reaction of chickpea varieties to Macrophomina phaseolina and their effect on peroxidase activity. Pak J Bot 37(3):761–767Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bayraktar H, Dolar FS (2012) Pathogenic variability of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris isolates from chickpea in Turkey. Pak J Bot 44(2):821–823Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boller T, Felix G (2009) A renaissance of elicitors: perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns and danger signals by pattern-recognition receptors. Annu Rev Plant Biol 60:379–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Borrow A, Brian PW, Chester VE, Curtis PJ, Hemming HG, Henehan C, Jeffreys EG, Lloyd PB, Nixon IS, Norris GL, Radley M (1955) Gibberellic acids a metabolic product of the fungus Gibberella fujikuroi some observations on its production and isolation. J Sci Food Agric 6:340–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Castagno LN, Estrella MJ, Sannazzaro AI, Grassano AE, Ruiz OA (2011) Phosphate solubilization mechanism and in vitro plant growth promotion activity mediated by Pantoea eucalypti isolated from Lotus tenuis rhizosphere in the Salado River Basin (Argentina). J Appl Microbiol 110:1151–1165PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chance B, Maheli AC (1995) Assay of catalases and peroxidases. Methods Enzymol 2:764–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Compant S, Duffy B, Nowak J, Clement C, Barka EA (2005) Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:4951–4959PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dasgupta D, Ghati A, Sarkar A, Sengupta C, Paul G (2015) Application of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) isolated from the rhizosphere of Sesbania bispinosa on the growth of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L). Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 4(5):1033–1042Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dobbelaere SJ, Vanderleyden Okon Y (2003) Plant growthpromoting effects of diazotrophs in the rhizosphere. Crit Rev Plant Sci 22:107–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dubey SC, Singh SR, Singh B (2010) Morphological and pathogenic variability of Indian isolates of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri causing chickpea wilt. Arch Phytopathol 43:174–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Edi Premono M, Moawad AM, Vlek PLG (1996) Effect of phosphate-solubilizing Pseudomonas putida on the growth of maize and its survival in the rhizosphere. Indones J Crop Sci 11:13–23Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ehmann A (1977) The Van Urk-Salkowski reagent-a sensitive and specific chromogenic reagent for silica gel thin-layer chromatographic detection and identification of indole derivatives. J Chromatogr 132:267–276PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ferraz HGM, Resende RS, Silveira PR, Andrade CCL, Milagres EA, Oliveira JR, Rodrigues FDÁ (2014) Rhizobacteria induces resistance against Fusarium wilt of tomato by increasing the activity of defense enzymes. Bragantia 73(3):274–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jha G, Anjaiah V (2006) Metabolites of rhizobacteria antagonistic towards fungal plant pathogens. Ann Microbiol 1:127–130Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jiménez-Gasco MM, Navas-Cortés JA, Jiménez-Díaz RM (2004) The Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris/Cicer arietinum pathosystem: a case study of the evolution of plant-pathogenic fungi into races and pathotypes. Int Microbiol 7(2):95–104PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jukanti AK, Gaur PM, Gowda CLL, Chibbar RN (2012) Nutritional quality and health benefits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): a review. Br J Nutr 108:11–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Karnwal A, Kumar V (2012) Influence of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (pgpr) on the growth of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Ann Food Sci Technol 13(2):1–6Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Karthikeyan M, Radhika K, Mathiyajhagan S, Bhaskaran R, Smiyappan R, Vellazhahan R (2006) Induction of phenolics and defence related enzymes in coconut (Cococs nucifera) roots treated with biocongtrol agents. Braz J Plant Physiol 18(3):367–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kavino M, Harish S, Kumar N, Saravanakumar D, Domodaran T, Soorianasundaram K, Samiyappan R (2007) Rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria for induction of systemic resistance of banana plantlets against bunchy top virus. Soil Biol Biochem 39:1087–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    King EO, Ward MK, Raney DE (1954) Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorecein. J Lab Clin Med 44:301–307PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kumari P, Khanna V, Sharma P, Kumari S (2016) Allelopathic effects of native Bacillus sp. against Fusarium oxysporum causing chickpea wilt. Allelopathy J 38(1):77–90Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kumari S, Khanna V (2014) Effect of antagonistic rhizobacteria coinoculated with Mesorhizobium ciceris on control of fusarium wilt in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Afric J Micro Res 8(12):1255–1265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kumari S, Khanna V (2018) Biological management of vascular wilt of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) incited by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris by antagonistic rhizobacteria co-inoculated with native Mesorhizobium. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 7(1):920–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Landa BB, Cortés JAN, Díaz RMJ (2004) Influence of temperature on plant–rhizobacteria interactions related to biocontrol potential for suppression of fusarium wilt of chickpea. Plant Pathol 53:341–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Leon M, Yaryura PM, Montecchia MS, Hernandez AI, Correa OS, Pucheu NL, Kerber NL, Garcia AF (2009) Antifungal activity of selected indigenous Pseudomonas and Bacillus from the soybean rhizosphere. Int J Microbiol 5:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Madhaiyan M, Suresh Reddy BV, Anandham R, Senthilkumar M, Poonguzhali S, Sundaram SP, Sa T (2006) Plant growth-promoting methylobacterium induces defense responses in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) compared with rot pathogens. Curr Microbiol 53:270–276PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mhadhbi H, Fotopoulos V, Djebali N, Polidoros AN, Aouani ME (2009) Behaviours of Medicago truncatulaSinorhizobium meliloti symbioses under osmotic stress in relation with the symbiotic partner input: effects on nodule functioning and protection. J Agron Crop Sci 195(3):225–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Moradi H, Bahramnejad B, Amini Siosemarde A, Allahverdipoor KH (2012) Suppression of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Fusarium wilt by Bacillus subtillis and Trichoderma harzianum. Plant Omics J 5(2):68–74Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Niranjan SR, Shetty NP, Shetty HS (2004) Seed bio-priming with Pseudomonas fluorescens isolates enhances growth of pearl millet plants and induces resistance against downy mildew. Int J Pest Manage 50(1):41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pande S, Desai S, Sharma M (2010) Impacts of climate change on rainfed crop diseases: current status and future research needs. Natl Symp Clim Change Rainfed Agric Hyderabad 18(20):55–59Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Patel NJ, Kandoliya UK, Talati JG (2015) Induction of phenol and defence-related enzymes during wilt (Fusarium udum Butler) infestation in pigeon pea. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 4(2):291–299Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Raaijmakers JM, Paulitz TC, Steinberg C, Alabouvette C, Moenne-Loccoz Y (2009) The rhizosphere: a playground and battlefield for soilborne pathogens and beneficial microorganisms. Plant Soil 321:341–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ramanathan A, Sammiyapan R, Vidhyasekaran P (2000) Induction of defense mechanisms in greengram leaves and suspension-cultured cells by Macrophomina phaseolina and is elicitors. J Plant Dis Protect 107:245–257Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ryu CM, Murphy JF, Reddy MS, Kloepper JW (2007) A two strain mixture of rhizobia elicits induction of systemic resistance against Pseudomonas syringae and Cucumber Mosaic virus coupled to promotion of plant growth on Arabidopsis thaliana. J Microbiol Biotechnol 17:280–286PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sarwar N, Sarwar Mand Jamil FF (2003) Role of Polyphenol oxidase and catalase in Ascochyta blight resistance in chickpea. Pak J Bot 35(1):111–115Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Schwyn B, Neilands JB (1987) Universal chemical assay for detection and determination of siderophore. Anal Biochem 160:47PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Shahid M, Singh A, Srivastava M, Sachan CP, Biswas SK (2011) Effect of Seed treatment on germination and vigour in chickpea. Trends Biosci 4:205–207Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sharma P (2011) Evaluation of disease control and plant growth promotion potential of biocontrol agents on Pisum sativum and comparison of their activity with popular chemical control agent-carbendazim. J Toxicol Environ Health Sci 3(5):127–138Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Siddiqui ZA, Shakeel U (2009) Biocontrol of wilt disease complex of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Mill sp.) by isolates of Pseudomonas spp. Afr J Plant Sci 3:1–12Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sindhu SS, Suneja S, Goel AK, Parmar N, Dadarwal KR (2002) Plant growth promoting effects of Pseudomonas sp. on coinoculation with Mesorhizobium sp. Cicer strain under sterile and wilt sick soil conditions. Appl Soil Ecol 19:57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Singh A, Jain A, Sarma BK, Upadhyay RS, Singh HB (2014) Rhizosphere competent microbial consortium mediates rapid changesin phenolic profiles in chickpea during Sclerotium rolfsii infection. Microbiol Res 169:353–360PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Singh D (2013) Exopolysaccharide producing rhizobacteria and their role in moisture stress alleviation. MSc. Thesis. Indian Agricultural Research Institute New Delhi – 110012, India p. 54Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Singh UP, Sarma BK, Singh DP (2003) Effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and culture filtrate of Sclerotium rolfsii on phenolic and salicylic acid contents in chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Curr Microbiol 46:131–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Spilker T, Coenye T, Vandamme P, LiPuma JJ (2004) PCR-based assay for differentiation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from other Pseudomonas species recovered from cystic fibrosis patients. J Clin Microbiol 42:2074–2079PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sujatha N, Ammani K (2011) The activities of the pathogenesis related proteins in Vigna mungo. Drug Invention Today 3:86–90Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Walters RR, Ratsep J, Havis ND (2013) Controlling crop diseases using induced resistance: challenges for the future. J Exp Bot 5:1–19Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wang N, Liu M, Guo L, Yang X, Qiu D (2016) A Novel Protein Elicitor (PeBA1) from Bacillus amylo liquefaciens NC6 Induces Systemic Resistance in Tobacco. Int J Biol Sci 12(6):757–767PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MicrobiologyPunjab Agricultural UniversityLudhianaIndia
  2. 2.Department of Plant Breeding and GeneticsPunjab Agricultural UniversityLudhianaIndia

Personalised recommendations