Advertisement

Hydrogen Peroxide Production of Group A Streptococci (GAS) is emm-Type Dependent and Increased at Low Temperatures

  • Leonhard MenschnerEmail author
  • Uta Falke
  • Peter Konrad
  • Reinhard Berner
  • Nicole Toepfner
Article
  • 38 Downloads

Abstract

Group A streptococcus (GAS) is an important human pathogen whose clinical isolates differ in their ability to produce hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). H2O2 is primarily produced by the enzyme lactate oxidase (LctO), an in depth in silico research revealed that all genome-sequenced GAS possess the required gene lctO. The importance of lctO for GAS is underlined by its highly conserved catabolite control element (cre box) as well as its perfect promotor sequence in comparison to the known consensus sequences of the Gram-positive model organism Bacillus subtilis. In this study, we provide further insight in the function and regulation of lactate oxidase by analyzing a large group of clinical GAS isolates. We found that H2O2 production increased over time in the late stationary phase; after 4 days of incubation, 5.4% of the isolates showed a positive result at 37 °C, while the rate increased to 16.4% at 20 °C. This correlation between H2O2 production and low temperatures suggests additional regulatory mechanisms for lctO besides catabolite control protein A (CcpA) and indicates that lctO might play a role for GAS energy metabolism at sub-body temperatures. Furthermore, we could identify that H2O2 production was different among clinical isolates; we could correlate H2O2 production to emm-types, indicating that emm-types 6 and 75 had the highest rate of H2O2 production. The emm-type- and temperature-dependent H2O2 production of clinical GAS isolates might contribute to their different survival strategies.

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement

The isolates investigated within this manuscript were derived as part of routine diagnostic procedures at the University Hospital of Freiburg, Germany. The anonymized investigation of such samples and the respective clinical data review were covered by the general care contract filed between the University Hospital and the patients and/or their parents. The contract was approved by the local IRB.

Supplementary material

284_2019_1683_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (448 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 447 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Carapetis JR, Steer AC, Mulholland EK, Weber M (2005) The global burden of group A streptococcal diseases. Lancet Infect Dis 5(11):685–694.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70267-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tan LK, Eccersley LR, Sriskandan S (2014) Current views of haemolytic streptococcal pathogenesis. Curr Opin Infect Dis 27(2):155–164.  https://doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0000000000000047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Walker MJ, Barnett TC, McArthur JD, Cole JN, Gillen CM, Henningham A, Sriprakash KS, Sanderson-Smith ML, Nizet V (2014) Disease manifestations and pathogenic mechanisms of group A streptococcus. Clin Microbiol Rev 27(2):264–301.  https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00101-13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Graham MR, Virtaneva K, Porcella SF, Gardner DJ, Long RD, Welty DM, Barry WT, Johnson CA, Parkins LD, Wright FA, Musser JM (2006) Analysis of the transcriptome of group A streptococcus in mouse soft tissue infection. Am J Pathol 169(3):927–942.  https://doi.org/10.2353/ajpath.2006.060112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shelburne SA, Davenport MT, Keith DB, Musser JM (2008) The role of complex carbohydrate catabolism in the pathogenesis of invasive streptococci. Trends Microbiol 16(7):318–325.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2008.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shelburne SA 3rd, Keith D, Horstmann N, Sumby P, Davenport MT, Graviss EA, Brennan RG, Musser JM (2008) A direct link between carbohydrate utilization and virulence in the major human pathogen group A streptococcus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(5):1698–1703.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0711767105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Musser JM, Shelburne SA 3rd (2009) A decade of molecular pathogenomic analysis of group A streptococcus. J Clin Invest 119(9):2455–2463.  https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI38095 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shelburne SA, Olsen RJ, Suber B, Sahasrabhojane P, Sumby P, Brennan RG, Musser JM (2010) A combination of independent transcriptional regulators shapes bacterial virulence gene expression during infection. PLoS Pathog 6(3):e1000817.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000817 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deutscher J, Ake FM, Derkaoui M, Zebre AC, Cao TN, Bouraoui H, Kentache T, Mokhtari A, Milohanic E, Joyet P (2014) The bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate:carbohydrate phosphotransferase system: regulation by protein phosphorylation and phosphorylation-dependent protein-protein interactions. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 78(2):231–256.  https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00001-14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kinkel TL, McIver KS (2008) CcpA-mediated repression of streptolysin S expression and virulence in the group A streptococcus. Infect Immun 76(8):3451–3463.  https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00343-08 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hondorp ER, Hou SC, Hause LL, Gera K, Lee CE, McIver KS (2013) PTS phosphorylation of Mga modulates regulon expression and virulence in the group A streptococcus. Mol Microbiol 88(6):1176–1193.  https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.12250 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Valdes KM, Sundar GS, Belew AT, Islam E, El-Sayed NM, Le Breton Y, McIver KS (2018) Glucose levels alter the Mga virulence regulon in the group A streptococcus. Sci Rep 8(1):4971.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23366-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kietzman CC, Caparon MG (2010) CcpA and LacD.1 affect temporal regulation of Streptococcus pyogenes virulence genes. Infect Immun 78(1):241–252.  https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00746-09 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Seki M, Iida K, Saito M, Nakayama H, Yoshida S (2004) Hydrogen peroxide production in Streptococcus pyogenes: involvement of lactate oxidase and coupling with aerobic utilization of lactate. J Bacteriol 186(7):2046–2051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pericone CD, Overweg K, Hermans PW, Weiser JN (2000) Inhibitory and bactericidal effects of hydrogen peroxide production by Streptococcus pneumoniae on other inhabitants of the upper respiratory tract. Infect Immun 68(7):3990–3997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhu L, Kreth J (2012) The role of hydrogen peroxide in environmental adaptation of oral microbial communities. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2012:717843.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/717843 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Duane PG, Rubins JB, Weisel HR, Janoff EN (1993) Identification of hydrogen peroxide as a Streptococcus pneumoniae toxin for rat alveolar epithelial cells. Infect Immun 61(10):4392–4397Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Okahashi N, Nakata M, Sumitomo T, Terao Y, Kawabata S (2013) Hydrogen peroxide produced by oral streptococci induces macrophage cell death. PLoS ONE 8(5):e62563.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062563 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Okahashi N, Sumitomo T, Nakata M, Sakurai A, Kuwata H, Kawabata S (2014) Hydrogen peroxide contributes to the epithelial cell death induced by the oral mitis group of streptococci. PLoS ONE 9(1):e88136.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Saito M, Ohga S, Endoh M, Nakayama H, Mizunoe Y, Hara T, Yoshida S (2001) H2O2-nonproducing Streptococcus pyogenes strains: survival in stationary phase and virulence in chronic granulomatous disease. Microbiology 147(Pt 9):2469–2477.  https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-147-9-2469 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Saito M, Seki M, Iida K, Nakayama H, Yoshida S (2007) A novel agar medium to detect hydrogen peroxide- producing bacteria based on the prussian blue-forming reaction. Microbiol Immunol 51(9):889–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32(5):1792–1797.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rambaut A FigTree download page. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree. Accessed 9 July 2018
  24. 24.
    Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O (2010) New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol 59(3):307–321.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syq010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30(4):772–780.  https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wood DN, Weinstein KE, Podbielski A, Kreikemeyer B, Gaughan JP, Valentine S, Buttaro BA (2009) Generation of metabolically diverse strains of Streptococcus pyogenes during survival in stationary phase. J Bacteriol 191(20):6242–6252.  https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00440-09 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Facklam R (2002) What happened to the streptococci: overview of taxonomic and nomenclature changes. Clin Microbiol Rev 15(4):613–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Richards VP, Palmer SR, Pavinski Bitar PD, Qin X, Weinstock GM, Highlander SK, Town CD, Burne RA, Stanhope MJ (2014) Phylogenomics and the dynamic genome evolution of the genus Streptococcus. Genome Biol Evol 6(4):741–753.  https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evu048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Helmann JD (1995) Compilation and analysis of Bacillus subtilis sigma A-dependent promoter sequences: evidence for extended contact between RNA polymerase and upstream promoter DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 23(13):2351–2360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Marciniak BC, Pabijaniak M, de Jong A, Duhring R, Seidel G, Hillen W, Kuipers OP (2012) High- and low-affinity cre boxes for CcpA binding in Bacillus subtilis revealed by genome-wide analysis. BMC Genomics 13:401.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wood DN, Chaussee MA, Chaussee MS, Buttaro BA (2005) Persistence of Streptococcus pyogenes instationary-phase cultures. J Bacteriol 187(10):3319–3328.  https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.187.10.3319-3328.2005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Watson ME Jr, Nielsen HV, Hultgren SJ, Caparon MG (2013) Murine vaginal colonization model for investigating asymptomatic mucosal carriage of Streptococcus pyogenes. Infect Immun 81(5):1606–1617.  https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00021-13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Redanz S, Cheng X, Giacaman RA, Pfeifer CS, Merritt J, Kreth J (2018) Live and let die: hydrogen peroxide production by the commensal flora and its role in maintaining a symbiotic microbiome. Mol Oral Microbiol 33(5):337–352.  https://doi.org/10.1111/omi.12231 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Regev-Yochay G, Trzcinski K, Thompson CM, Lipsitch M, Malley R (2007) SpxB is a suicide gene of Streptococcus pneumoniae and confers a selective advantage in an in vivo competitive colonization model. J Bacteriol 189(18):6532–6539.  https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00813-07 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zheng LY, Itzek A, Chen ZY, Kreth J (2011) Oxygen dependent pyruvate oxidase expression and production in Streptococcus sanguinis. Int J Oral Sci 3(2):82–89.  https://doi.org/10.4248/IJOS11030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cross A, Collard M, Nelson A (2008) Body segment differences in surface area, skin temperature and 3D displacement and the estimation of heat balance during locomotion in hominins. PLoS ONE 3(6):e2464.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002464 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hamburger M Jr, Green MJ (1946) The problem of the dangerous carrier of hemolytic streptococci; observations upon the role of the hands, of blowing the nose, of sneezing, and of coughing in the dispersal of these microorganisms. J Infect Dis 79:33–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kang SO, Wright JO, Tesorero RA, Lee H, Beall B, Cho KH (2012) Thermoregulation of capsule production by Streptococcus pyogenes. PLoS ONE 7(5):e37367.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037367 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Brown L, Kim JH, Cho KH (2016) Presence of a prophage determines temperature-dependent capsule production in Streptococcus pyogenes. Genes (Basel) 7(10):74.  https://doi.org/10.3390/genes7100074 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kang SO, Caparon MG, Cho KH (2010) Virulence gene regulation by CvfA, a putative RNase: the CvfA-enolase complex in Streptococcus pyogenes links nutritional stress, growth-phase control, and virulence gene expression. Infect Immun 78(6):2754–2767.  https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01370-09 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Carl Gustav CarusTechnische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations