Draft Genome of Burkholderia cenocepacia TAtl-371, a Strain from the Burkholderia cepacia Complex Retains Antagonism in Different Carbon and Nitrogen Sources
Burkholderia cenocepacia TAtl-371 was isolated from the rhizosphere of a tomato plant growing in Atlatlahucan, Morelos, Mexico. This strain exhibited a broad antimicrobial spectrum against bacteria, yeast, and fungi. Here, we report and describe the improved, high-quality permanent draft genome of B. cenocepacia TAtl-371, which was sequenced using a combination of PacBio RS and PacBio RS II sequencing methods. The 7,496,106 bp genome of the TAtl-371 strain is arranged in three scaffolds, contains 6722 protein-coding genes, and 99 RNA only-encoding genes. Genome analysis revealed genes related to biosynthesis of antimicrobials such as non-ribosomal peptides, siderophores, chitinases, and bacteriocins. Moreover, analysis of bacterial growth on different carbon and nitrogen sources shows that the strain retains its antimicrobial ability.
FURR, EYTG, and IAH recipients of a fellowship from CONACYT. JAIG and PES are recipient of SNI, EDI, and COFAA fellowships. We thank Dr. E.O. Lopez-Villegas (Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, IPN) for the transmission electron microscopic analysis. The genome sequence was conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, a DOE Office of Science User Facility, is supported by the Office of Sciences of the U.S. Department of Energy under the proposal 1572 and Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. Phenotypic analysis was partially funded by Projects SIP 20170492 and SIP 20180117.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
- 3.Sawana A, Adeolu M, Gupta RS (2014) Molecular signatures and phylogenomic analysis of the genus Burkholderia: proposal for division of this genus into the emended genus Burkholderia containing pathogenic organisms and a new genus Paraburkholderia gen. nov. harboring environmental species. Front Genet 5:429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Lopes-Santos L, Castro DBA, Ferreira-Tonin M, Corrêa DBA, Weir BS, Park D, Ottoboni LMM, Neto JR, Destéfano SAL (2017) Reassessment of the taxonomic position of Burkholderia andropogonis and description of Robbsia andropogonis gen. nov., comb. nov. Anton Leeuw Int J G 110:727–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Estrada-de los Santos P, Palmer M, Chávez-Ramírez B, Beukes C, Steenkamp ET, Briscoe L, Khan N, Maluk M, Lafos M, Humm E, Arrabit M, Crook M, Gross E, Simon MF, dos Reis Jr FB, Whitman WB, Shapiro N, Poole PS, Hirsch AM, Venter SN, James EK (2018) Whole gnome analysies suggests that Burkholderia sensu lato contains two additional novel genera (Mycetohabitnas gen. nov., and Trinickia gen. nov.): implications for the evolution of diazotrophy and nodulation in the Burkholderiaceae. Genes 9:389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Martina P, Leguizamon M, Prieto CI, Sousa SA, Montanaro P, Draghi WO, Stämmler M, Bettiol M, de Carvalho CCCR, Palau J (2017) Burkholderia puraquae sp. nov., a novel species of the Burkholderia cepacia complex isolated from hospital settings and agricultural soils. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 68:14–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Rojas-Rojas FU, Salazar-Gomez A, Vargas-Díaz ME, Vásquez-Murrieta MS, Hirsch AM, De Mot R, Ghequire MGK, Ibarra JA, Estrada-de los Santos P (2018) Broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity by Burkholderia cenocepacia TAtl-371, a strain isoalted from the tomato rhizosphere. Microbiology 164:1072–1086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Rojas-Rojas FU, Tapia-García EY, Maymon M, Humm E, Huntemann M, Clum A, Pillay M, Pananiappan K, Varghese N, Mikhailova N, Stamatis D, Reddy TBK, Markowitz V, Ivanova N, Kyrpides N, Woyke T, Shapiro N, Hirsch AM, Estrada-de los Santos P (2017) Draft genome of Paraburkholderia caballeronis TNe-841T, a free-living, nitrogen-fixing, tomato plant-associated bacterium. Stand Genom Sci 12:80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Yao GW, Duarte I, Le TT, Carmody L, LiPuma JJ, Young R, Gonzalez CF (2017) A broad-host-range tailocin from Burkholderia cenocepacia. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:e03414–e03416Google Scholar