Advertisement

Current Microbiology

, Volume 75, Issue 8, pp 1103–1107 | Cite as

iTRAQ-Based Proteomic Analysis of Wheat Bunt Fungi Tilletia controversa, T. caries, and T. foetida

  • Chao Li
  • Xiaoqing Wei
  • Li GaoEmail author
  • Wanquan ChenEmail author
  • Taiguo Liu
  • Bo Liu
Article

Abstract

This is the first study of proteomics of wheat bunt fungi Tilletia controversa (TCK), T. caries (TCT), and T. foetida (TFL) using the iTRAQ technique. Based on the relative quantities of specific proteins between each two pathogens, we found 50 up-regulated and 80 down-regulated protein genes in TCK compared to TFL, 62 up-regulated and 82 down-regulated protein genes in TCT compared to TFL, 47 up-regulated and 30 down-regulated protein genes in TCK compared to TCT, and there were 1 protein of up-regulated and 4 proteins of down-regulated in the three pairs. These protein data could be of great value for exploring the key proteins which play an important role in the interactions of these pathogens with their host. Some of them could be valuable for differentiating the three pathogens with monoclonal antibodies produced by the specific proteins and may enable in-site detection of the pathogens and performing routine monitoring as a diagnostic assay in wheat shipments.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NSFC-CGIAR (31761143011), National Key R & D Program of China (2016YFC1201200), National Natural Science Foundation (31571965), Natural Science Foundation of Beijing (6162022), and Outstanding Young Guide Fund of CAAS (Y2017JC09) and Chinese Ministry of Agriculture (CARS-03).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interests.

Supplementary material

284_2018_1490_MOESM1_ESM.pptx (3.9 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 4022 KB)
284_2018_1490_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (89 kb)
Supplementary material 2. Table S1: Up and down-regulated proteins in TCK compared to TFL (XLSX 88 KB)
284_2018_1490_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx (97 kb)
Supplementary material 3. Table S2: Up and down-regulated proteins in TCT compared to TFL (XLSX 97 KB)
284_2018_1490_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx (60 kb)
Supplementary material 4. Table S3: Up and down-regulated proteins in TCK compared to TCT (XLSX 59 KB)
284_2018_1490_MOESM5_ESM.xlsx (14 kb)
Supplementary material 5. Table S4: Up and down-regulated proteins in the three pairs (XLSX 13 KB)
284_2018_1490_MOESM6_ESM.docx (11 kb)
Supplementary material 6 (DOCX 11 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Josefsen L, Christiansen SK (2002) PCR as a tool for the early detection and diagnosis of common bunt in wheat, caused by Tilletia tritici. Mycol Res 106(11):1287–1292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liang H, Peng YL, Zhang GZ, Chen WQ, Liu TG (2006) Amplification and sequence analysis of the rDNA intergenic spacer (rDNA-IGS) from three Tilletia species. Acta Phytopathol Sin 36(5):407–412Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kellerer T, Sedlmeier M, Rabenstein F, Killermann B (2006) Development of immunochemical and PCR methods for qualitative detection of Tilletia species in organic seeds. In Proceedings of the XVth Biennial Workshop on the Smut Fungi.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen J, Souza EJ, Guttieri MJ, Obrien K, Wheeler J, Sorensen L, Clayton J, Chen XM, Goates BJ, Hole D, Brown BD, Marshall JM, Zemetra R (2012). Registration of “UI SRG” wheat. J Plant Regist 6(1):66–70Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wiese MV (1987) Compendium of wheat diseases. Soil science, 2nd edn. APS Press, MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Whitaker T, Wu J, Peterson G, Giesbrecht F, Johansson A (2001) Variability associated with the official USDA sampling plan used to inspect export wheat shipments for Tilletia controversa spores. Plant Pathol 50(6):755–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Peterson GL, Whitaker TB, Stefanski RJ, Podleckis EV, Phillips JG, Wu JS, Martinez WH (2009) A risk assessment model for importation of United States milling wheat containing Tilletia contraversa. Plant Dis 93(6):560–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoffman J (1982) Bunt of wheat. Plant Dis 66(11):979–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Russell BW, Mills D (1993) Electrophoretic karyotypes of Tilletia caries, T. controversa, and their F1 progeny: further evidence for conspecific status. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 6:66–66CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stockwell VO, Trione E (1986) Distinguishing teliospores of Tilletia controversa from those of T. caries by fluorescence microscopy. Plant Dis 70(10):924–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Trione E, Krygier B (1977) New tests to distinguish telipspores of Tilletia controversa, the dwarf bunt fungus, from spores of other Tilletia species. Phytopathol 67:1166–1172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Banowetz G, Trione E, Krygier B (1984) Immunological comparisons of teliospores of two wheat bunt fungi, Tilletia species, using monoclonal antibodies and antisera. Mycologia 76:51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weber G, Schauz K (1985) Characterization of spore protein patterns in Tilletia controversa and Tilletia caries with gel electrophoretic methods/Charakterisierung der Sporenproteinmuster von Tilletia controversa und Tilletia caries mit gelelektrophoretischen Methoden. Z Pflanzenkrankh Pflanzenschutz, J Plant Dis Prot 92:600–605Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kawchuk LM, Kim WK, Nielsen J (1988) A comparison of polypeptides from the wheat bunt fungi Tilletia laevis. T. tritici, and T. controversa. Can J Bot 66(12):2367–2376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Banowetz G, Doss R (1994) A comparison of polypeptides from teliospores of Tilletia controversa (Kuhn) and Tilletia tritici (Bjerk) Wint. J Phytopathol 140(4):285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yuan Q, Nian S, Yin Y, Li M, Cai J, Wang Z (2009) Development of a PCR-based diagnostic tool specific to wheat dwarf bunt, caused by Tilletia controversa. Eur J Plant Pathol 124(4):585–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gang DR, Weber DJ (1995) Preparation of genomic DNA for RAPD analysis from thick-walled dormant teliospores of Tilletia species. Biotechniques 19:93–97Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shi Y, Loomis P, Christian D, Carris L, Leung H (1996) Analysis of the genetic relationships among the wheat bunt fungi using RAPD and ribosomal DNA markers. Phytopathology 86(3):311–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McDonald J, Wong E, White G (2000) Differentiation of Tilletia species by rep-PCR genomic fingerprinting. Plant Dis 84(10):1121–1125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McNeil M, Roberts A, Cockerell V, Mulholland V (2004) Real-time PCR assay for quantification of Tilletia caries contamination of UK wheat seed. Plant Pathol 53(6):741–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kochanová M, Zouhar M, Prokinová E, Rysanek P (2004) Detection of Tilletia controversa and Tilletia caries in wheat by PCR method. Plant Soil Environ 50(2):75–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Eibel P, Wolf GA, Koch E (2005) Detection of Tilletia caries, causal agent of common bunt of wheat, by ELISA and PCR. J Phytopathol 153(5):297–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gao L, Feng C, Li B, Liu T, Liu B, Chen W (2015) Detection of Tilletia controversa using immunofluorescent monoclonal antibodies. J Appl Microbiol 118(2):497–505CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kim ST, Kim SG, Hwang DH, Kang SY, Kim HJ, Lee BH, Lee JJ, Kang KY (2004) Proteomic analysis of pathogen-responsive proteins from rice leaves induced by rice blast fungus, Magnaporthe grisea. Proteomics 4(11):3569–3578CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72(1–2):248–254CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Su L, Cao L, Zhou R, Jiang Z, Xiao K, Kong W, Wang H, Deng J, Wen B, Tan F (2013) Identification of novel biomarkers for sepsis prognosis via urinary proteomic analysis using iTRAQ labeling and 2D-LC-MS/MS. PloS ONE 8(1):e54237CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Disease and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant ProtectionChinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.College of Plant ProtectionGansu Agricultural UniversityLanzhouChina

Personalised recommendations