Advertisement

Current Microbiology

, Volume 71, Issue 5, pp 566–571 | Cite as

Isolation and Screening of Rhizosphere Bacteria from Grasses in East Kavango Region of Namibia for Plant Growth Promoting Characteristics

  • D. H. Haiyambo
  • P. M. ChimwamurombeEmail author
  • B. Reinhold-Hurek
Article

Abstract

A diverse group of soil bacteria known as plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) is able to inhabit the area close to plant roots and exert beneficial effects on plant growth. Beneficial interactions between rhizospheric bacteria and plants provide prospects for isolating culturable PGPR that can be used as bio-fertilizers for sustainable crop production in communities that cannot easily afford chemical fertilizers. This study was conducted with the aim of isolating rhizospheric bacteria from grasses along the Kavango River and screening the bacterial isolates for plant growth promoting characteristics. The bacteria were isolated from rhizospheres of Phragmites australis, Sporobolus sp., Vetiveria nigritana, Pennisetum glaucum and Sorghum bicolor. The isolates were screened for inorganic phosphate solubilization, siderophore production and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production. The nitrogen-fixing capability of the bacteria was determined by screening for the presence of the nifH gene. Up to 21 isolates were obtained from P. australis, Sporobolus sp., S. bicolor, P. glaucum and V. nigritana. The genera Bacillus, Enterobacter, Kocuria, Pseudomonas and Stenotrophomonas, identified via 16S rDNA were represented in the 13 PGPR strains isolated. The isolates exhibited more than one plant growth promoting trait and they were profiled as follows: three phosphate solubilizers, four siderophore producers, eight IAA producing isolates and five nitrogen-fixers. These bacteria can be used to develop bio-fertilizer inoculants for improved soil fertility management and sustainable production of local cereals.

Keywords

Plant Growth Promote Rhizobacteria Stenotrophomonas nifH Gene Pennisetum Glaucum Kocuria 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by The Future Okavango (TFO) Project through the BMBF (Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany) Research Framework Programme, Research for Sustainable Development (FONA).

Compliance with Ethical Standard

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahemad M, Kibret M (2014) Mechanisms and applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: current perspective. J King Saud Univ Sci 26(1):1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barraquio WL, Segubre EM, Gonzalez MAS, Verma SC, James EK, Ladha JK, Tripathi AK (2000) Diazotrophic enterobacteria: what is their role in the rhizosphere of rice. In: Ladha JK, Reddy PM (eds) The quest for nitrogen fixation in rice. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Philippines, pp 93–118Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bashan Y, Holguin G, Lifshitz R (1993) Isolation and characterization of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. In: Glick BR, Thompson JE (eds) Methods in plant molecular biology and biotechnology. CRC Press, Florida, pp 331–345Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burbano Roa CS (2011) Molecular analysis of root-associated diazotrophs in important plants from Southern Africa and South America. Dissertation, University of BremenGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carvalho-Assef APDA, Gomes MZR, Silva ARA, Werneck L, Rodrigues CAS, Souza MJ, Asensi MD (2010) IMP-16 in Pseudomonas putida and Pseudomonas stutzeri: potential reservoirs of multidrug resistance. J Med Microbiol 59(9):1130–1131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chaiharn M, Chunhaleuchanon S, Kozo A, Lumyong S (2008) Screening of rhizobacteria for their plant growth promoting activities. KMITL Sci Technol J 8(1):18–23Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Edi-Premono M, Moawad MA, Vleck PLG (1996) Effect of phosphate solubilizing Pseudmonas putida on the growth of maize and its survival in the rhizosphere. Indones. J Crop Sci 11:13–23Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fletcher J, Leach JE, Eversole K, Tauxe R (2013) Human pathogens on plants: designing a multidisciplinary strategy for research. Phytopathology 103(4):306–315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garcia CA, De Rossi BP, Alcaraz E, Vay C, Franco M (2012) Siderophores of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: detection and determination of their chemical nature. Rev Argent Microbiol 44(3):150–154PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Glick BR (2012) Plant growth-promoting bacteria: mechanisms and applications. Scientifica 2012Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goswami D, Pithwa S, Dhandhukia P, Thakker JN (2014) Delineating Kocuria turfanensis 2M4 as a credible PGPR: a novel IAA producing bacteria isolated from saline desert. J Plant Interact 9(1):566–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Govindasamy V, Senthilkumar M, Magheshwaran V, Kumar U, Bose P, Sharma V, Annapurna K (2011) Bacillus and Paenibacillus spp.: potential PGPR for sustainable agriculture. In: Maheshwari DK (ed) Plant growth and health promoting bacteria. Springer, Germany, pp 333–364Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grönemeyer J, Berkelmann D, Mubyana-John T, Haiyambo D, Chimwamurombe P, Kasaona B, Hurek T, Reinhold-Hurek B (2014) A survey for plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria and symbionts associated with crop plants in the Okavango region of Southern Africa. Biodivers Ecol 5:287–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grönemeyer JL, Burbano Roa CS, Hurek T, Reinhold-Hurek B (2012) Isolation and characterization of root-associated bacteria from agricultural crops in the Kavango region of Namibia. Plant Soil 356(1–2):67–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hopkins DW, Dungait JA (2010) Soil microbiology and nutrient cycling. In: Dixon GR, Tilston EL (eds) Soil microbiology and sustainable crop production. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 59–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kloepper JW, Schroth MN (1978) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on radishes. In: Station de pathologie vegetale et phyto-bacteriologie (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Plant Pathogenic Bacteria 2: 879–882Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lodewyckx C, Vangronsveld J, Porteous F, Moore ER, Taghavi S, Mezgeay M, der Lelie DV (2002) Endophytic bacteria and their potential applications. Crit Rev Plant Sci 21(6):583–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lugtenberg B, Kamilova F (2009) Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Ann Rev Microbiol 63:541–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mander C, Wakelin S, Young S, Condron L, O’Callaghan M (2012) Incidence and diversity of phosphate-solubilising bacteria are linked to phosphorus status in grassland soils. Soil Biol Biochem 44(1):93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Matthijs S, Baysse C, Koedam N, Tehrani KA, Verheyden L, Budzikiewicz H, Cornelis P (2004) The Pseudomonas siderophore quinolobactin is synthesized from xanthurenic acid, an intermediate of the kynurenine pathway. Mol Microbiol 52(2):371–384CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mehnaz S, Mirza MS, Haurat J, Bally R, Normand P, Bano A, Malik KA (2001) Isolation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis of the beneficial bacteria from the rhizosphere of rice. Can J Microbiol 47(2):110–117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ollinger J, Song KB, Antelmann H, Hecker M, Helmann JD (2006) Role of the Fur regulon in iron transport in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 188(10):3664–3673PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Piggot PJ (2009) Bacillus Subtilis. In: Schaechter M (ed) Desk encyclopedia of microbiology, 2nd edn. Academic Press, California, pp 154–165Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Podile AR, Kishore GK (2006) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. In: Gnanamanickam SS (ed) Plant-associated bacteria. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 195–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Reinhold B, HurekT Niemann EG, Fendrik I (1986) Close association of Azospirillum and diazotrophic rods with different root zones of Kallar grass. App Environ Microb 52(Suppl 3):520Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Reinhold-Hurek B, Hurek T (2000) Reassessment of the taxonomic structure of the diazotrophic genus Azoarcus sensu lato and description of three new genera and new species, Azovibrio restrictus gen. nov., sp. nov., Azospira oryzae gen. nov., sp. nov. and Azonexus fungiphilus gen. nov., sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50(2):649–659CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ryan RP, Monchy S, Cardinale M, Taghavi S, Crossman L, Avison MB, Dow JM (2009) The versatility and adaptation of bacteria from the genus Stenotrophomonas. Nat Rev Microbiol 7(7):514–525CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ryu RJ, Patten CL (2008) Aromatic amino acid-dependent expression of indole-3-pyruvate decarboxylase is regulated by TyrR in Enterobacter cloacae UW5. J Bacteriol 190(21):7200–7208PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Saha R, Saha N, Donofrio RS, Bestervelt LL (2012) Microbial siderophores: a mini review. J Basic Microb 52:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Saharan BS, Nehra V (2011) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: a critical review. Life Sci Med Res 21:1–30Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sato A, Watanabe T, Unno Y, Purnomo E, Shinano T, Osaki M (2009) Analysis of diversity of diazotrophic bacteria associated with the rhizosphere of a tropical Arbor, Melastoma malabathricum L. Microb Environ 24(8):81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schütz A, Golbik R, Tittmann K, Svergun DI, Koch MHJ, Hübner G, König S (2003) Studies on structure–function relationships of indolepyruvate decarboxylase from Enterobacter cloacae, a key enzyme of the indole acetic acid pathway. Eur J Biochem 270:2322–2331CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schwyn B, Neilands JB (1987) Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Anal Biochem 160(1):47–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tilston EL, Sizmur T, Dixon GR, Otten W, Harris JA (2010) The Impact of Land-Use Practices on Soil Microbes. In: Dixon GR, Tilson EL (eds) Soil microbiology and sustainable crop production. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 273–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Turrientes MC, Baquero MR, Sánchez MB, Valdezate S, Escudero E, Berg G, Martínez JL (2010) Polymorphic mutation frequencies of clinical and environmental Stenotrophomonas maltophilia populations. Appl Environ Microbiol 76(6):1746–1758PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2010) Country pilot partnership: adapting to climate change through the improvement of traditional crops and livestock farming in Namibia. www.thegef.org/gef/sites/thegef.org/files/gef_prj_docs/GEFProjectDocuments/M&E/TE/FY2012/UNDP/G002915/2915_3598_Namibia_CCA_TE.pdf
  37. 37.
    Vassilev N, Vassileva M, Nikolaeva I (2006) Simultaneous P-solubilizing and biocontrol activity of microorganisms: potentials and future trends. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 71(2):137–144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    World Bank (2009) Namibia: country brief. Open knowledge repository. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/2630
  39. 39.
    Yasmin F, Othman R, Sijam K, Saad MS (2010) Characterization of beneficial properties of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria isolated from sweet potato rhizosphere. Afr J Microbiol Res 3(11):815–821Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. H. Haiyambo
    • 1
  • P. M. Chimwamurombe
    • 1
    Email author
  • B. Reinhold-Hurek
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of NamibiaWindhoekNamibia
  2. 2.Department of Microbe-Plant InteractionsUniversity of BremenBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations