Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles of Salmonella enterica Serotypes Recovered from Pens of Commercial Feedlot Cattle Using Different Types of Composite Samples
- 141 Downloads
Salmonella enterica in cattle production systems may be associated with important human and animal disease issues. However, tremendous diversity exists among Salmonella recovered, and more information is needed about strains of greatest potential health concern, particularly those that are multidrug resistant (MDR). By characterizing Salmonella isolates from commercial feedlot pens, this study aimed to evaluate the strain diversity and prevalence of MDR Salmonella from different types of composite pen samples. Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles, serotype, and presence or absence of the integron-encoded intI1 gene were determined for 530 Salmonella isolates recovered using composite rope (n = 335), feces (n = 59), and water (n = 136) samples from 21 pens in 3 feedlots. The study investigated only pens with available isolates from multiple sample types. Most isolates (83.0%) of the 19 Salmonella serotypes identified were susceptible or intermediately susceptible to all the antimicrobials evaluated. Resistance to sulfisoxazole (14.9%), streptomycin (3.8%), and tetracycline (3.6%) were the most common. None of the isolates tested positive for a class 1 integron, and only 2.5% were resistant to multiple antimicrobials. All the MDR isolates, namely, serotypes Uganda (n = 9), Typhimurium (n = 2), and Give (n = 2), were resistant to at least five antimicrobials. Most MDR isolates (n = 11) were from two pens during 1 week within one feedlot. Overall, many Salmonella isolates collected within a pen were similar in terms of serotype and antimicrobial susceptibility regardless of sample type. However, MDR Salmonella and rare serotypes were not recovered frequently enough to suggest a general strategy for appropriate composite sampling of feedlot cattle populations for Salmonella detection and monitoring.
- 2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2002) Outbreak of multi–drug-resistant Salmonella Newport—United States, January–April 2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rev 51:545–548Google Scholar
- 3.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute/NCCLS (2002) Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals. Approved standard, 2nd edn. CLSI/NCCLS document M31-A, Wayne, PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
- 13.Renter DG, Alam MJ, Ives SE et al (2006) Fecal shedding of Salmonella in feedlot cattle that were treated for apparent respiratory disease. Proceedings of the 87th Annual Conference of Research Workers in Animal Diseases, December 3–5, Chicago, IL, p. 57Google Scholar
- 16.Smith B (2002) Salmonellosis in ruminants. In: Large Animal Internal Medicine, 3rd edn. Mosby Inc, St. Louis, Missouri, pp. 775–779Google Scholar
- 19.Sorenson O, Van Donkersgoed J, McFall M et al (2002) Salmonella spp. shedding by Alberta beef cattle and the detection of Salmonella spp. in ground beef. J Food Prot 65:484–491Google Scholar