Current Microbiology

, Volume 58, Issue 1, pp 64–69 | Cite as

Phylogenetic Placement of Pentatomid Stink Bug Gut Symbionts



Insect bacterial symbionts are ubiquitous, however, only a few groups of host families have been well studied in relation to their associations with microbes. The determination of the phylogenetic relationships among bacteria associated with different species within an insect family can provide insights into the biology and evolution of these interactions. We studied the phylogenetic placement of vertically transmitted bacterial symbionts associated with the posterior midgut (crypt-bearing) region of pentatomid stink bugs (Hemiptera, Pentatomidae). Our results demonstrate that different host species carried one major bacterium in their midgut. Phylogenetic analyses of the 16S rRNA gene sequences obtained from the midgut of stink bugs placed all symbionts in a clade with Erwinia and Pantoea species, both plant-associated bacteria. Results indicate that symbiont monophyly occurs among recently diverged taxa (e.g., within a genus) but does not occur in the Pentatomidae. Results suggest that these vertically transmitted symbionts are occasionally replaced by other taxonomically similar bacteria over evolutionary time. Our findings highlight how the evolutionary history of hemipteran symbionts in unexplored host families may have unpredictable levels of complexity.


  1. 1.
    Buchner P (1965) Endosymbiosis of animals with plant microorganisms. Interscience, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baumann P (2005) Biology of bacteriocyte-associated endosymbionts of plant sap-suking insects. Annu Rev Microbiol 59:55–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fukatsu T, Hosokawa T (2002) Capsule-transmitted gut symbiotic bacterium of the Japanese common plataspid stinkbug, Megacopta punctatissima. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:389–396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hosokawa T, Kikuchi Y, Nikoh N et al (2006) Strict host-symbiont cospeciation and reductive genome evolution in insect gut bacteria. PLoS Biology 4:1841–1851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kikuchi Y, Hosokawa T, Fukatsu T (2007) Insect-microbe mutualism without vertical transmission: a stinkbug acquires a beneficial gut symbiont from the environment every generation. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:4308–4316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kikuchi Y, Meng XY, Fukatsu T (2005) Gut symbiotic bacteria of the genus Burkholderia in the broad-headed bugs Riptortus clavatus and Leptocorisa chinensis (Hemiptera: Alydidae). Appl Environ Microbiol 71:4035–4043PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Prado SS, Rubinoff D, Almeida RPP (2006) Vertical transmission of a pentatomid caeca-associated symbiont. Ann Entomol Soc Am 99:577–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Abe Y, Mishiro K, Takanashi M (1995) Symbiont of brown-winged green bug, Plautia stali Scott. Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 39:109–115Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lockwood JA, Story RN (1986) Adaptive functions of nymphal aggregation in the southern green stink bug, Nezara viridula (L.) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Environ Entomol 15:739–749Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fukatsu T, Nikoh N (1998) Two intracellular symbiotic bacteria from the mulberry psyllid Anomoneura mori (Insecta, Homoptera). Appl Environ Microbiol 64:3599–3606PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cole JR, Chai B, Farris RJ et al (2005) The Ribosomal Database Project (RDP-II): sequences and tools for high-throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 33:D294–D296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Keller K et al (2006) NAST: a multiple sequence alignment server for comparative analysis of 16S rRNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 34:W394–W399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huber T, Faulkner G, Hugenholtz P (2004) Bellerophon; a program to detect chimeric sequences in multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 20:2317–2319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Swofford DL (2002) PAUP* Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Version by D. L. Swofford. Sinauer, Sunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck P (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nylander JAA (2004) MrModeltest ver. 2. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre. Uppsala University, Uppsala, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp 41:95–98Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stackebrandt E, Ebers J (2006) Taxonomic parameters revisited: tarnished gold standards. Microbiol Today 33:152–155Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant and Environmental Protection ScienceUniversity of Hawaii at ManoaHonoluluUSA
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Science, Policy and ManagementUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations