Current Microbiology

, Volume 57, Issue 5, pp 412–417 | Cite as

Physiological Alteration of the Marine Bacterium Vibrio angustum S14 Exposed to Simulated Sunlight During Growth

  • Maher Abboudi
  • Sabine Matallana Surget
  • Jean-François Rontani
  • Richard Sempéré
  • Fabien JouxEmail author


Growth experiments on the marine bacterium Vibrio angustum S14 were conducted under four light conditions using a solar simulator: visible light (V), V + ultraviolet A (UV-A), V + UV-A + UV-B radiation, and dark. Growth was inhibited mainly by UV-B and slightly by UV-A. UV-B radiation induced filaments containing multiple genome copies with low cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers. These cells did not show modifications in cellular fatty acid composition in comparison with dark control cultures and decreased in size by division after subsequent incubation in the dark. A large portion of the bacterial population grown under visible light showed an alteration in cellular DNA fluorescence as measured by flow cytometry after SYBR-Green I staining. This alteration was not aggravated by UV-A and was certainly due to a change in DNA topology rather than DNA deterioration because all the cells remained viable and their growth was not impaired. Ecological consequences of these observations are discussed.


Vibrio Marine Bacterium Cellular Fatty Acid Cyclobutane Solar Incident Radiation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We thank T. Douki for determination CPDs by HPLC-MS/MS for standard samples. We are grateful to N. West for improvement of the language. This study was funded by the CNRS-INSU through the UVECO and ATIPE projects and by a fellowship from the Syrian Atomic Energy Commission to M.A.


  1. 1.
    Abboudi M, Jeffrey WH, Ghiglione J-F, Pujo-Pay M, Oriol L, Sempéré R, Charrière B, Joux F (2008) Effects of photochemical transformations of dissolved organic matter on bacterial metabolism and diversity in three contrasting coastal sites in the Northwestern Mediterranean Sea during summer. Microb Ecol 55:344–357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Azam F, Fenchel T, Field GJ, Gray JS, Meyer-Reil AL, Thingstad F (1983) The ecological role of water-column microbes in the sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 10:257–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berney M, Weilnemann HU, Egli T (2007) Adaptation to UVA radiation of E. coli growing in continuous culture. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 86:149–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boelen P, Post AF, Veldhuis MJ, Buma A (2002) Diel patterns of UVBR-induced DNA damage in picoplankton size fractions from the Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea. Microb Ecol 44:164–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bouvier T, del Giorgio PA, Gasol JM (2007) A comparative study of the cytometric characteristics of High and Low nucleic-acid bacterioplankton cells from different aquatic ecosystems. Environ Microbiol 9:2050–2066PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Lange HJ, Van Donk E (1997) Effects of UVB-irradiated algae on life history traits of Daphnia pulex. Freshwat Biol 38:711–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Douki T, Cadet J (2001) Individual determination of the yield of the main-UV induced dimeric pyrimidine photoproducts in DNA suggests a high mutagenicity of CC photolesions. Biochemistry 40:2495–2501PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eguchi M, Nishikawa T, MacDonald K, Cavicchioli R, Gottschal JC, Kjelleberg S (1996) Responses to stress and nutrient availability by the marine ultramicrobacterium Sphingomonas sp. strain RB2256. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:1287–1294PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elasri OM, Miller VR (1999) Study of the response of a biofilm bacterial community to UV radiation. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:2025–203PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goes JI, Handa N, Taguchi S, Hama T (1994) Effect of UV-B radiation on the fatty acid composition of the marine phytoplankter Tetraselmis sp.: relationship to cellular pigments. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 114:259–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gupta R, Bhadauriya P, Chauhan VS, Bisen PS (2008) Impact of UV-B radiation on thylakoid membrane and fatty acid profile of Spirulina platensis. Curr Microbiol 56:156–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hessen DO, DeLange HJ, Van Donk E (1997) UV-induced changes in phytoplankton cells and its effects on grazers. Freshwat Biol 38:513–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Horiuchi H, Takagi M, Yano K (1984) Relaxation of supercoiled plasmid DNA by oxidative stresses in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 160:1017–1021PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Janion C (2001) Some aspects of the SOS response system—a critical survey. Acta Biochim Pol 48:599–610PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jeffrey WH, Kase JP, Wilhelm SW (2000) Ultraviolet radiation effects on bacteria and viruses in marine ecosystems. In: Mora S, Demers S, Vernet M (eds) The effects of UV radiation on marine ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 206–236Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Joux F, Jeffrey WH, Lebaron P, Mitchell DL (1999) Marine bacterial isolates display diverse responses to UV-B radiation. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:3820–3827PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jürgens K, Güde H (1994) The potential importance of grazing-resistant bacteria in planktonic systems. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 112:169–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kjelleberg S, Alberston N, Flardh K, Holmquist L, Jouper-Jan A, Marouga R, Ostling J, Svenblad B, Weichart D (1993) How do non-differentiating bacteria adapt to starvation? Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 63:333–341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liang L, Beardall J, Heraud P (2006) Effects of nitrogen source and UV radiation on the growth, chlorophyll fluorescence and fatty acid composition of Phaeodactylum tricornutum and Chaetoceros muelleri (Bacillariophyceae). J Photochem Photobiol B:Biol 82:161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liltved H, Landfald B (1996) Influence of liquid holding recovery and photoreactivation on survival of ultraviolet-irradiated fish pathogenic bacteria. Wat Res 30:1109–1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Luttinger A (1995) The twisted ‘life’ of DNA in the cell: bacterial topoisomerases. Mol Microbiol 15:601–606PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nyström T (2004) Stationary-phase physiology. Annu Rev Microbiol 58:161–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rontani J-F, Christodoulou S, Koblizek M (2005) GC/MS structural characterization of fatty acids of marine aerobic anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria. Lipids 40:97–108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Skerratt JH, Davidson AD, Nichols PD, McMeekin TA (1998) Effect of UV-B radiation on lipid content of three Antarctic marine phytoplankton. Phytochemistry 49:999–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Smigielski AJ, Wallace B, Marshall KC (1990) Genes responsible for size reduction of marine Vibrios during starvation are located on the chromosome. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:1645–1648PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Thompson FL, Iida T, Swings J (2004) Biodiversity of vibrios. Microb Mol Biol Rev 68:403–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Weinstein-Fischer D, Elgrably-Weiss M, Altuvia S (2000) Escherichia coli response to hydrogen peroxide: a role for DNA supercoiling, Topoisomerase I and Fis. Mol Microbiol 35:1413–1420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maher Abboudi
    • 1
  • Sabine Matallana Surget
    • 2
  • Jean-François Rontani
    • 1
  • Richard Sempéré
    • 1
  • Fabien Joux
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Microbiologie Géochimie et Ecologie MarinesCNRS/INSU, UMR 6117, Centre d’Océanologie de Marseille, Université de la MéditerranéeMarseille Cedex 9France
  2. 2.UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS, UMR 7621, Laboratoire d’Océanographie Biologique de BanyulsBanyuls/merFrance

Personalised recommendations