Phylogenetic Analyses of Archaeal Ribosomal DNA Sequences from Salt Pan Sediment of Mumbai, India
- 214 Downloads
The archaeal diversity in salt pan sediment from Mumbai, India, was investigated by 16S rDNA-dependent molecular phylogeny. Small-subunit rRNA (16S rDNA) from salt pan sediment metagenome were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers specific to the domain archaea. Thirty-two unique phylotypes were obtained by PCR-based RFLP of 16S rRNA genes using endonucleases Hae111 and Msp1, which were most suitable to score the genetic diversity. These phylotypes spanned a wide range within the domain Archaea including both Crenarchaeota and Euryarcheaota. However, none of the retrieved Crenarchaeota sequences could be grouped with previously cultured Crenarchaeota. Of all the Euryarcheaota sequences, three sequences were related to Haloarchaea, two were related to cultured Methanosarcina sp., and the remaining sequences were affiliated with uncultured Methanosarcina sp., Methanogenium sp., and Methanolobus sp. Most of the sequences determined were closely related to the sequences that had been previously obtained from metagenome of a variety of marine environments. The phylogenetic study of a site investigated for the first time revealed the presence of a highly diverse archaeal population and may represent novel sequences and organisms specially adapted to the salt pan sediment of Mumbai. These findings are of fundamental value for understanding the complexity of salt pan ecosystems.
This work was supported by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) Government of India, Project No. SMM0002.
- Amann RI, Ludwig W, Schleifer KH (1995) Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol J Rev 59:143–169Google Scholar
- Benlloch S, Martinez-Murcia AJ, Rodriguez-Valera F (1995) Sequencing of bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA genes directly amplified from a hypersaline environment. Syst Appl Microbiol 18:574–581Google Scholar
- Benlloch S, Acinas SG, Anton J, Lopez L, Luz SP, Rodriguez-Valera F (2001) Archaeal biodiversity in crystallizer ponds from a solar saltern: culture versus PCR. Microbiol Ecol 41:12–19Google Scholar
- Boone DR, Whitman WB, Koga Y (2001) Order III: methanosarcinales. In: Boone DR, Castenholz RW, Garrity GM (eds) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, Vol 1, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, pp 268–293Google Scholar
- Grant WD, Larsen H (1989) Extremely halophilic archaeobacteria. In: Staley, Bryant, Pfennig, Holt (eds) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, Vol 3, 1st edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 2216–2219Google Scholar
- Khandavilli S, Sequiera F, Furtado I (1999) Metal tolerance of extremely halophilic bacteria isolated from estuaries of Goa, India. Ecol Environ Conserv 5:149–152Google Scholar
- Lyimo TJ, Pol A, Camp HJMO, Harhangi HR, Vogels GD (2000) Methanosarcina semesiae sp. nov., a dimethylsulfide-utilizing methanogen from mangrove sediment. Int J Syst Evol Micriob 50:171–178Google Scholar
- Neha S, Melissa MK, Yitai Liu, David RB (2005) Isolation and characterization of methylotrophic methanogens from anoxic marine sediments in Skan Bay, Alaska: description of Methanococcoides alaskense sp. nov., and emended description of Methanosarcina baltica. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:2531–2538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Oren A (1999) Bioenergetic aspects of halophilism. Microbial Mol Biol Review 63:334–348Google Scholar
- Quesada E, Ventosa A, Rodriguez-Valera F, Ramos-Cormenzana A (1982) Types and properties of some bacteria from hypersaline soils. J Appl Bacteriol 53:155–161Google Scholar
- Raghavan TM, Furtado I (2004) Occurrence of extremely halophilic Archaea in sediments from the continental shelf of west coast of India. Curr Sci 86:1065–1067Google Scholar