Advertisement

Current Microbiology

, Volume 53, Issue 6, pp 491–495 | Cite as

Bactericidal Activity of Copper and Niobium–Alloyed Austenitic Stainless Steel

  • M. I. Baena
  • M. C. Márquez
  • V. Matres
  • J. Botella
  • A. VentosaEmail author
Article

Abstract

Biofouling and microbiologically influenced corrosion are processes of material deterioration that originate from the attachment of microorganisms as quickly as the material is immersed in a nonsterile environment. Stainless steels, despite their wide use in different industries and as appliances and implant materials, do not possess inherent antimicrobial properties. Changes in hygiene legislation and increased public awareness of product quality makes it necessary to devise control methods that inhibit biofilm formation or to act at an early stage of the biofouling process and provide the release of antimicrobial compounds on a sustainable basis and at effective level. These antibacterial stainless steels may find a wide range of applications in fields, such as kitchen appliances, medical equipment, home electronics, and tools and hardware. The purpose of this study was to obtain antibacterial stainless steel and thus mitigate the microbial colonization and bacterial infection. Copper is known as an antibacterial agent; in contrast, niobium has been demonstrated to improve the antimicrobial effect of copper by stimulating the formation of precipitated copper particles and its distribution in the matrix of the stainless steel. Thus, we obtained slides of 3.8% copper and 0.1% niobium alloyed stainless steel; subjected them to three different heat treatment protocols (550°C, 700°C, and 800°C for 100, 200, 300, and 400 hours); and determined their antimicrobial activities by using different initial bacterial cell densities and suspending solutions to apply the bacteria to the stainless steels. The bacterial strain used in these experiments was Escherichia coli CCM 4517. The best antimicrobial effects were observed in the slides of stainless steel treated at 700°C and 800°C using an initial cell density of approximately 105 cells ml−1 and phosphate-buffered saline as the solution in which the bacteria came into contact with copper and niobium–containing steel.

Keywords

Niobium Initial Cell Density Control Slide Stainless Steel Sample Microbiologically Influence Corrosion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

M. I. Baena was a recipient of a fellowship from the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología. This investigation was supported by a contract with Acerinox, S.A. (OG–036/01) and a grant from the Junta de Andalucía.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Anwar H, Strap JL, Costerton JW (1992) Establishment of aging biofilms: Possible mechanism of bacterial resistance to antimicrobial therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 36:1347–1351PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP (1999) Bacterial biofilms: A common cause of persistent infections. Science 284:1318–1322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fujita N, Ohmura K, Kikuchi M, Suzuki T, Hiroshige I (1996) Effect of Nb on high-temperature properties for ferritic stainless steel. Scripta Mater 35:705–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hasegawa M, Miyakusu K, Ohkubo N, Nakamura S (1997) Stainless steel improved in antimicrobial property and manufacturing thereof. European patent EP0779374A1. Japan: Nisshin SteelGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Morihiro H, Katsuhisa M, Naoto O, Sadayuki N (1997) Austenitic stainless steel excellent in antibacterial characteristic and its production. Patent JP9176800, Japan: Nisshin SteelGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nachtrab WT, Chou YT (1986) High temperature ductility loss in carbon-manganese and niobium-treated steels. Metallurgical Transactions 17A:1995–2006Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ohkubo N, Nakamura S, Yamamoto M, Miyakusu K, Hasegawa M, Munusue Y (1999) Antimicrobial activity and basis properties of antimicrobial stainless steels NSSAM series. Technological Bulletin 77:89–96Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sadao H, Susumu S, Takeshi Y, Misako T (2000) Stainless steel product having enhanced antibacterial action and method for producing the same. Patent JP11264057 (WO9947721). Japan: Kawasaki SteelGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Suci PA, Mittelman MW, Yu FP, Geesey GG (1994) Investigation of ciprofloxacin penetration into Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 38:2125–2133PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Trevors JT (1987) Copper resistance in bacteria. Microbiol Sci 4:29–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Trevors JT, Oddie KM, Belliveau BH (1985) Metal resistance in bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 32:39–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    World Health Organization (1982) Toxicologic evaluation of certain food additives. Joint WHO/FAO Expert Committee on Food Additives. WHO Food Additives Series: 17. Geneva, Switzerland: WHOGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. I. Baena
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. C. Márquez
    • 1
  • V. Matres
    • 2
  • J. Botella
    • 2
  • A. Ventosa
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of PharmacyUniversity of SevillaSpain
  2. 2.Acerinox, S.A.Los Barrios (Cádiz)Spain

Personalised recommendations