Advertisement

Discovery of hPRDX5-based peptide inhibitors blocking PD-1/PD-L1 interaction through in silico proteolysis and rational design

  • Sen Zou
  • Juanjuan Liu
  • Zhengyang Sun
  • Xiao Feng
  • Zhongbo Wang
  • Yuanyuan JinEmail author
  • Zhaoyong YangEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

The human peroxiredoxin-5 (hPRDX5) is a member of the family of antioxidant enzymes, which could resist immunosuppression by promoting immune organs development, lymphocyte proliferation and up-regulation of the levels of serum cytokines. However, being a recombinant protein, the hPRDX5 exhibits some problems including the high production cost and bad tissue penetration. Compared to macromolecular therapeutic agents, synthetic peptides have several advantages as drug candidates, such as lower manufacturing costs, reduced immunogenicity, and better organ or tumor penetration. The purpose of this research was to design the novel peptides come from hPRDX5 that can block the interaction of PD-1 and PD-L1.

Methods

Herein in this work, we firstly confirmed the inhibitory activity of hPRDX5 on the binding of PD-L1 to PD-1 based on the previous observation, subsequently, in silico proteolysis and rational design (such as alanine scanning mutagenesis and truncation) were used to automate the design of new peptides derived from hPRDX5 with anti-tumour activity.

Results

We found that the most potent peptide could block the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction effectively with an IC50 of 0.646 μM, and could restore the function of Jurkat T cells which had been suppressed by stimulated HCT116 cells. Moreover, experiments with tumor-bearing mice models showed that the peptide IMB-P6-10 could effectively inhibit tumor growth and showed extraordinary low acute toxicity in vivo.

Conclusions

The peptides described in this paper may provide novel low-molecular-weight drug candidates for cancer immunotherapy.

Keywords

Peptide inhibitor Human peroxiredoxin-5 Immunotherapy Rational design Protein–protein interactions (PPIs) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Guangteng Wu (ArNuXon Pharm-Sci Co., Ltd., Beijing) for the manuscript revision.

Funding

This work was supported by the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (Grants 2016-I2 M-3-022), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 81761128016 and 8187131584) and National Mega-project for Innovative Drugs (Grants 2018ZX09711001-006-001 and 2018ZX09711001-007-003).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Parish CR (2003) Cancer immunotherapy: the past, the present and the future. Immunol Cell Biol 81:106–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Waldmann TA (2003) Immunotherapy: past, present and future. Nat Med 9:269–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sharma P, Allison JP (2015) The future of immune checkpoint therapy. Science 348:56–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sharma P, Wagner K, Wolchok JD, Allison JP (2011) Novel cancer immunotherapy agents with survival benefit: recent successes and next steps. Nat Rev Cancer 11:805–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Topalian SL, Drake CG, Pardoll DM (2015) Immune checkpoint blockade: a common denominator approach to cancer therapy. Cancer Cell 27:450–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ishida Y, Agata Y, Shibahara K, Honjo T (1992) Induced expression of PD-1, a novel member of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily, upon programmed cell death. EMBO J 11:3887–3895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Freeman GJ, Long AJ, Iwai Y et al (2000) Engagement of the PD-1 immunoinhibitory receptor by a novel B7 family member leads to negative regulation of lymphocyte activation. J Exp Med 192:1027–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Latchman Y, Wood CR, Chernova T et al (2001) PD-L2 is a second ligand for PD-1 and inhibits T cell activation. Nat Immunol 2:261–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Keir ME, Butte MJ, Freeman GJ, Sharpe AH (2008) PD-1 and its ligands in tolerance and immunity. Annu Rev Immunol 26:677–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Keir ME, Francisco LM, Sharpe AH (2007) PD-1 and its ligands in T-cell immunity. Curr Opin Immunol 19:309–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zou W, Chen L (2008) Inhibitory B7-family molecules in the tumour microenvironment. Nat Rev Immunol 8:467–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sakuishi K, Apetoh L, Sullivan JM, Blazar BR, Kuchroo VK, Anderson AC (2010) Targeting Tim-3 and PD-1 pathways to reverse T cell exhaustion and restore anti-tumor immunity. J Exp Med 207:2187–2194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sui X, Ma J, Han W et al (2015) The anticancer immune response of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and the genetic determinants of response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies in cancer patients. Oncotarget 6:19393–19404PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Luke JJ, Ott PA (2015) PD-1 pathway inhibitors: the next generation of immunotherapy for advanced melanoma. Oncotarget 6:3479–3492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yamazaki T, Akiba H, Iwai H et al (2002) Expression of programmed death 1 ligands by murine T cells and APC. J Immunol 169:5538–5545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harding FA, Stickler MM, Razo J, DuBridge RB (2010) The immunogenicity of humanized and fully human antibodies: residual immunogenicity resides in the CDR regions. MAbs 2:256–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nelson AL, Dhimolea E, Reichert JM (2010) Development trends for human monoclonal antibody therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov 9:767–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Su X, Dong C, Zhang J et al (2014) Combination therapy of anti-cancer bioactive peptide with Cisplatin decreases chemotherapy dosing and toxicity to improve the quality of life in xenograft nude mice bearing human gastric cancer. Cell Biosci 4:7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Su L, Xu G, Shen J et al (2010) Anticancer bioactive peptide suppresses human gastric cancer growth through modulation of apoptosis and the cell cycle. Oncol Rep 23:3–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Su XL, Ouyang XH, Xu GH, Shen J, Wang ZY (2008) Effect of ACBP-S on cell cycle and apoptosis in human gastric cancer cells. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi 30:422–427PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhao YY, Peng SD, Su XL (2006) Effects of anti-cancer bioactive peptide on cell cycle in human nasopharyngeal carcinoma strain CNE. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 41:607–611PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Feng X, Liu J, Fan S et al (2016) The identification of goat peroxiredoxin-5 and the evaluation and enhancement of its stability by nanoparticle formation. Sci Rep 6:24467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vlieghe P, Lisowski V, Martinez J, Khrestchatisky M (2010) Synthetic therapeutic peptides: science and market. Drug Discov Today 15:40–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Minkiewicz P, Dziuba J, Iwaniak A, Dziuba M, Darewicz M (2008) BIOPEP database and other programs for processing bioactive peptide sequences. J AOAC Int 91:965–980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dziuba B, Dziuba M (2014) New milk protein-derived peptides with potential antimicrobial activity: an approach based on bioinformatic studies. Int J Mol Sci 15:14531–14545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lafarga T, O’Connor P, Hayes M (2014) Identification of novel dipeptidyl peptidase-IV and angiotensin-I-converting enzyme inhibitory peptides from meat proteins using in silico analysis. Peptides 59:53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Qiao L, Li B, Chen Y et al (2016) Discovery of anti-hypertensive oligopeptides from adlay based on in silico proteolysis and virtual screening. Int J Mol Sci 17:2099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Azzarito V, Long K, Murphy NS, Wilson AJ (2013) Inhibition of alpha-helix-mediated protein-protein interactions using designed molecules. Nat Chem 5:161–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jin Y, Li L, Yang Z, Liu M, Guo H, Shen W (2017) The discovery of a novel compound with potent antitumor activity: virtual screening, synthesis, biological evaluation and preliminary mechanism study. Oncotarget 8:24635–24643PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zak KM, Grudnik P, Guzik K et al (2016) Structural basis for small molecule targeting of the programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). Oncotarget 7:30323–30335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Li Q, Quan L, Lyu J et al (2016) Discovery of peptide inhibitors targeting human programmed death 1 (PD-1) receptor. Oncotarget 7:64967–64976PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sun Z, Zhang Y, Cao D et al (2018) PD-1/PD-L1 pathway and angiogenesis dual recognizable nanoparticles for enhancing chemotherapy of malignant cancer. Drug Deliv 25:1746–1755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wilkins MR, Gasteiger E, Bairoch A et al (1999) Protein identification and analysis tools in the ExPASy server. Methods Mol Biol 112:531–552Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Aurora R, Rose GD (1998) Helix capping. Protein Sci 7:21–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NHC Key Laboratory of Biotechnology of Antibiotics, Institute of Medicinal BiotechnologyChinese Academy of Medical SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.North China University of Science and TechnologyTangshanChina

Personalised recommendations