Population pharmacokinetic analysis of high-dose methotrexate in pediatric and adult oncology patients
- 155 Downloads
High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is widely used in pediatric and adult oncology treatment regimens. This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic model to characterize pediatric and adult MTX exposure across various disease types and dosing regimens, and to evaluate exposure–toxicity relationships.
MTX pharmacokinetic data from pediatric and adult patients were collected. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed to determine the effects of age, liver function, renal function, and demographics on MTX disposition. The final model was used in Monte Carlo simulations to generate expected exposures for different dosing regimens. The association of toxicity, determined through chart review, and MTX area under the curve (AUC) was modeled using logistic regression.
The analysis included 5116 MTX concentrations from 320 patients (135 adult, age 19–79 years; 185 pediatric, age 0.6–19 years). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and treatment cycle number were independent predictors of clearance (CL). CL varied 2.1-fold over the range of study eGFR values and increased 14% for treatment cycle numbers greater than 7. Higher MTX AUC was associated with higher risk of nephrotoxicity in adults, and neurotoxicity and hepatotoxicity in pediatrics.
This study represents one of the most comprehensive evaluations of HD-MTX PK across a wide range of ages and disease types. After accounting for differences in renal function, age did not impact CL, although toxicity patterns differed by age. The model allows for early identification of patients with slowed MTX clearance and at higher risk of toxicity.
KeywordsMethotrexate Pediatric Population pharmacokinetic modeling Oncology
The authors would like to thank Dr. Sam Martinez, Dr. Jeremiah Momper, Dr. Lawrence Alejandro, and Dr. Don Barkauskas for help with the project. Funding support was provided by a Research in Pediatric and Developmental Pharmacology NIH grant (1U54HD090259-01, Dr. Capparelli).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Dr. Capparelli serves on the data safety and monitoring board for Melinta Pharmaceuticals, Cempra Pharmaceuticals and The Medicines Company.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- 5.Widemann BC, Balis FM, Kim A, Boron M, Jayaprakash N, Shalabi A, O’Brien M, Eby M, Cole DE, Murphy RF, Fox E, Ivy P, Adamson PC (2010) Glucarpidase, leucovorin, and thymidine for high-dose methotrexate-induced renal dysfunction: clinical and pharmacologic factors affecting outcome. J Clin Oncol 28(25):3979–3986. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4540 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 7.Abelson HT, Fosburg MT, Beardsley GP, Goorin AM, Gorka C, Link M, Link D (1983) Methotrexate-induced renal impairment: clinical studies and rescue from systemic toxicity with high-dose leucovorin and thymidine. J Clin Oncol 1(3):208–216. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19220.127.116.11 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Ramsey LB, Balis FM, O’Brien MM, Schmiegelow K, Pauley JL, Bleyer A, Widemann BC, Askenazi D, Bergeron S, Shirali A, Schwartz S, Vinks AA, Heldrup J (2018) Consensus guideline for use of glucarpidase in patients with high-dose methotrexate induced acute kidney injury and delayed methotrexate clearance. Oncologist 23(1):52–61. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0243 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Glucarpidase Package Insert (2019) https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2012/125327lbl.pdf. Accessed May 7 2019
- 14.Zhang W, Zhang Q, Tian X, Zhao H, Lu W, Zhen J, Niu X (2015) Population pharmacokinetics of high-dose methotrexate after intravenous administration in Chinese osteosarcoma patients from a single institution. Chin Med J (Engl) 128(1):111–118. https://doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.147829 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Fukuhara K, Ikawa K, Morikawa N, Kumagai K (2008) Population pharmacokinetics of high-dose methotrexate in Japanese adult patients with malignancies: a concurrent analysis of the serum and urine concentration data. J Clin Pharm Ther 33(6):677–684. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2710.2008.00966.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Dupuis C, Mercier C, Yang C, Monjanel-Mouterde S, Ciccolini J, Fanciullino R, Pourroy B, Deville JL, Duffaud F, Bagarry-Liegey D, Durand A, Iliadis A, Favre R (2008) High-dose methotrexate in adults with osteosarcoma: a population pharmacokinetics study and validation of a new limited sampling strategy. Anticancer Drugs 19(3):267–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Hui KH, Chu HM, Fong PS, Cheng WTF, Lam TN (2019) Population pharmacokinetic study and individual dose adjustments of high-dose methotrexate in Chinese pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia or osteosarcoma. J Clin Pharmacol 59(4):566–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.1349 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Nader A, Zahran N, Alshammaa A, Altaweel H, Kassem N, Wilby KJ (2017) Population pharmacokinetics of intravenous methotrexate in patients with hematological malignancies: utilization of routine clinical monitoring parameters. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 42(2):221–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13318-016-0338-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Widemann BC, Balis FM, Murphy RF, Sorensen JM, Montello MJ, O’Brien M, Adamson PC (1997) Carboxypeptidase-G2, thymidine, and leucovorin rescue in cancer patients with methotrexate-induced renal dysfunction. J Clin Oncol 15(5):2125–2134. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1918.104.22.1685 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Tsurusawa M, Gosho M, Mori T, Mitsui T, Sunami S, Kobayashi R, Fukano R, Tanaka F, Fujita N, Inada H, Koh K, Takimoto T, Saito A, Fujimoto J, Nakazawa A, Horibe K, Lymphoma committee of the Japanese Pediatric Leukemia/lymphoma Study G (2015) Statistical analysis of relation between plasma methotrexate concentration and toxicity in high-dose methotrexate therapy of childhood nonHodgkin lymphoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 62(2):279–284. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.25305 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Bhojwani D, Sabin ND, Pei D, Yang JJ, Khan RB, Panetta JC, Krull KR, Inaba H, Rubnitz JE, Metzger ML, Howard SC, Ribeiro RC, Cheng C, Reddick WE, Jeha S, Sandlund JT, Evans WE, Pui CH, Relling MV (2014) Methotrexate-induced neurotoxicity and leukoencephalopathy in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 32(9):949–959. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.53.0808 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 29.Hegyi M, Gulacsi A, Csagoly E, Csordas K, Eipel OT, Erdelyi DJ, Muller J, Nemes K, Lautner-Csorba O, Kovacs GT (2012) Clinical relations of methotrexate pharmacokinetics in the treatment for pediatric osteosarcoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 138(10):1697–1702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-012-1214-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Joerger M, Huitema AD, Krahenbuhl S, Schellens JH, Cerny T, Reni M, Zucca E, Cavalli F, Ferreri AJ (2010) Methotrexate area under the curve is an important outcome predictor in patients with primary CNS lymphoma: a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis from the IELSG no. 20 trial. Br J Cancer 102(4):673–677. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605559 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar