Skip to main content
Log in

Randomized, prospective, comparative study on the effects and safety of sorafenib vs. hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background/aims

Treatment responses of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) remain unacceptably low and treatment modalities are limited. We compared the efficacy and safety of sorafenib and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC).

Methods

In this randomized, prospective, comparative study, data on 58 patients with advanced HCC with PVTT, with Child–Turcotte–Pugh (CTP) scores of 5–7, were collected from six university hospitals between January 2013 and October 2015. Twenty-nine patients were treated with sorafenib and twenty-nine with HAIC.

Results

The median overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) were significantly longer in the HAIC group than in the sorafenib group (14.9 vs.7.2 months, p = 0.012 and 4.4 vs. 2.7 months, p = 0.010). The objective response (OR) rates were 27.6 and 3.4% in the HAIC and sorafenib groups, respectively (p = 0.001). In univariate analysis, sex, main portal vein invasion and treatment modality were significant prognostic factors of OS (p = 0.044, 0.040, 0.015), whereas cause of HCC, tumor number, tumor location and treatment modality were significant prognostic factors of TTP (p = 0.040, 0.002, 0.034, 0.014). In multivariate analysis, sex and treatment modality were significant prognostic factors of OS (p = 0.008, 0.005), whereas cause of HCC, tumor number, tumor location and treatment modality were significant prognostic factors of TTP (p = 0.038, 0.038, 0.015, 0.011). Major complications included hyperbilirubinemia (44.8%), AST elevation (34.5%), ascites (13.8%) and catheter-related complications (3.4%) in the HAIC group and hyperbilirubinemia (34.5%), hand-foot syndrome (31.0%) and AST elevation (27.6%) in the sorafenib group.

Conclusions

For managing advanced HCC with PVTT, HAIC may be a valuable treatment modality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

PVTT:

Portal vein tumor thrombosis

HAIC:

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy

CTP:

Child–Turcotte–Pugh

HBV:

Hepatitis B virus

HCV:

Hepatitis C virus

mUICC:

Modified Union for International Cancer Control

AFP:

Alphafetoprotein

ECOG:

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

ANC:

Absolute neutrophil count

OS:

Overall survival

TTP:

Time to progression

OR:

Objective response

BCLC:

Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer

EASL:

European Association for the Study of Liver

CT:

Computed tomography

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

mRECIST:

Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors

AST:

Aspartate transaminase

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

References

  1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J et al (2015) Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65:87–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Llovet JM, Fuster J, Bruix J (1999) Intention-to-treat analysis of surgical treatment for early hepatocellular carcinoma: resection versus transplantation. Hepatology 30(6):1434–1440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sugioka A, Tsuzuki T, Kanai T (1993) Postresection prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Surgery 113(6):612–618

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Forner A, Llovet JM, Bruix J (2012) Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 379(9822):1245–1255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bruix J, Sherman M, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (2011) Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology 53(3):1020–1022

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Forner A, Reig ME, de Lope CR et al (2010) Current strategy for staging and treatment: the BCLC update and future prospects. Semin Liver Dis 30(1):61–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. European Association for The Study Of The Liver, European Organisation For Research And Treatment Of Cancer (2012) EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 56(4):908–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jang BK, Chung WJ, Park KS et al (2005) The efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma according to extrahepatic collateral feeding vessels. Korean J Hepatol 11(4):359–370

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ando E, Tanaka M, Yamashita F et al (2002) Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: analysis of 48 cases. Cancer 95(3):588–595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim HY, Kim JD, Bae SH et al (2010) A comparative study of high-dose hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and transarterial chemoembolization using doxorubicin for intractable, advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Korean J Hepatol 16(4):355–361

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Eun JR, Lee HJ, Moon HJ et al (2009) Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using high-dose 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin with or without interferon-alpha for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis. Scand J Gastroenterol 44(12):1477–1486

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Song MJ (2015) Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 21(13):3843–3849

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Song do S, Bae SH (2012) Changes of guidelines diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma during the last ten-year period. Clin Mol Hepatol 18(3):258–267

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 2014 Korean Liver Cancer Study Group-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Korean J Radiol. 2015;16(3):465–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Woo HY, Bae SH, Park JY et al (2010) A randomized comparative study of high-dose and low-dose hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for intractable, advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 65(2):373–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lencioni R, Llovet JM (2010) Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Liver Dis 30(1):52–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. National Cancer Institute C. Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) v4.0. http://ctep.cancer.gov

  18. Villa E, Moles A, Ferretti I et al (2000) Natural history of inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma: estrogen receptors’ status in the tumor is the strongest prognostic factor for survival. Hepatology 32(2):233–238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Llovet JM, Bustamante J, Castells A et al (1999) Natural history of untreated nonsurgical hepatocellular carcinoma: rationale for the design and evaluation of therapeutic trials. Hepatology 29(1):62–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yu SJ (2016) A concise review of updated guidelines regarding the management of hepatocellular carcinoma around the world: 2010–2016. Clin Mol Hepatol 22(1):7–17

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Llovet JM, Ricci S et al (2008) Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 359(4):378–390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jeong SW, Jang JY, Shim KY et al (2013) Practical effect of sorafenib monotherapy on advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumor thrombosis. Gut Liver 7(6):696–703

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Shao YY, Huang CC, Liang PC et al (2010) Hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 6(2):80–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Park JG (2015) Long-term outcomes of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who achieved complete remission after sorafenib therapy. Clin Mol Hepatol 21(3):287–294

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Dasari S, Tchounwou PB (2014) Cisplatin in cancer therapy: molecular mechanisms of action. Eur J Pharmacol 5:740:364–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kawaoka T, Aikata H, Hyogo H et al (2015) Comparison of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus sorafenib monotherapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Dig Dis 16(9):505–512

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Song DS, Song MJ, Bae SH et al (2015) A comparative study between sorafenib and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis. J Gastroenterol 50(4):445–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Obi S, Sato S, Kawai T (2015 Sep) Current status of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy. Liver Cancer 4(3):188–199

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cheng AL, Kang YK, Chen Z et al (2009) Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 10(1):25–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hiramine Y, Uto H, Imamura Y, Tabu K et al (2011) Sorafenib and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparative study. Exp Ther Med 2:433–441

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bruix J, Tak WY, Gasbarrini A et al (2013) Regorafenib as second-line therapy for intermediate or advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: multicentre, open-label, phase II safety study. Eur J Cancer 49(16):3412–4319

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Yang H, Woo HY, Lee SK et al (2017) A comparative study of sorafenib and metronomic chemotherapy for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer-stage C hepatocellular carcinoma with poor liver function. Clin Mol Hepatol 23(2):128–137

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Korea Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. https://www.hira.or.kr/rd/anticancer/antiCancerList.do?pgmid=HIRAA030023030000

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Woo Jin Chung or Si Hyun Bae.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, J., Chung, W.J., Bae, S.H. et al. Randomized, prospective, comparative study on the effects and safety of sorafenib vs. hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 82, 469–478 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-018-3638-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-018-3638-0

Keywords

Navigation