Skip to main content
Log in

Concurrent radiotherapy: fotemustine combination for newly diagnosed malignant glioma patients, a phase II study

  • Clinical Trial Report
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Fotemustine is a nitrosourea compound used for the treatment of malignant gliomas, especially in France. Recently, an EORTC-NCIC study has shown that a concomitant combination of radiotherapy plus temozolomide (an oral cytotoxic drug) improved survival in glioblastoma patients. We set out to test a concurrent combination of radiotherapy and fotemustine for newly malignant gliomas.

Methods

A prospective single-center phase II study opened for accrual in September 2004. Patients over 18 years of age able to give informed consent and with histologically proven, newly diagnosed supratentorial malignant gliomas were eligible. All patients were treated by a standard cranial irradiation (conformal irradiation, tumor bulk plus a margin of 2.5 cm) and concomitant daily administration of 10 mg/m2 of fotemustine (5 days per week, 6 weeks, 1 h 30 min before radiation therapy). Adjuvant chemotherapy, fotemustine, was administered at tumor progression as standard and classic regimen.

Results

Twenty-two patients were enrolled, 16 men and 6 women, median age 56 years (range 32–74), median Karnofsky performance status 70 (range 60–90). Histology included 16 glioblastomas, 3 anaplastic astrocytomas, 2 anaplastic oligodendrogliomas and 1 mixed glioma. Eight patients underwent surgery (three total resections). Fourteen patients had a stereotactic biopsy. The concurrent radiotherapy–fotemustine combination was well tolerated: toxicity was mild and three hematologic toxicities grade 3–4 were observed. Median survival from the initial diagnosis was 9.9 months, two patients are currently alive. Median survival was 11 months for surgery and 9 months for stereotactic biopsy.

Conclusions

Concomitant radiotherapy–fotemustine combination is safe and well tolerated. Overall survival of over 10 months for the whole population compares favorably with other reports.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Behin A, Hoang-Zuan K, Carpentier A et al (2003) Primary brain tumors in adults. Lancet 361:323–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. De Angelis LM (2001) Brain tumors. N Eng J Med 344:114–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fine HA, Dears KBG, Loeffler JS et al (1993) Meta-analysis of radiation with and without chemotherapy for malignant gliomas in adults. Cancer 71:2585–2597

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stewart LA (2002) Chemotherapy in adult high-grade glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 12 randomised trials. Lancet 359:1011–1018

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stupp R, Hegi M, Gilbert M et al (2007) Chemoradiotherapy in malignant glioma: standard of care and future directions. J Clin Oncol 25:4127–4136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Beauchesne P, Pourchet J, Dore JF et al (2007). Effect on human malignant glioma cell lines and glioma xenografts of anti-neoplastic agents combined with low radiation doses. In: Proceedings AACR 2007, p 5058 (abstract)

  7. Deloffre P, Paraire M, Bizzari JP (1990) Muphoran (fotémustine), une nouvelle nitrosourée : études précliniques. Cancer Commun 4:7–16

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fischel JL, Formento P, Etienne MC et al (1990) In vitro chemosensitivity testing of fotemustine (S 10036), a new antitumor nitrosourea. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 25:337–341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Filippeschi S, Colombo T, Bassini D et al (1998) Antitumor activity of the novel nitrosourea S 10036 in rodent tumors. Anticancer Res 8:1351–1354

    Google Scholar 

  10. IRIS Cancer Treatment Division (1999) Fotemustine Investigator’s Brochure. Version No. 3, September 15

  11. Frenay M, Giroux B, Khoury S et al (1991) Phase II study of fotemustine in recurrent supratentorial malignant gliomas. Eur J Cancer 27A:852–856

    Google Scholar 

  12. Silvani A, Lamperti E, Gaviani P et al (2008) Salvage chemotherapy with procarbazine and fotemustine combination in the treatment of temozolomide treated recurrent glioblastoma patients. J Neuro-Oncol 87:143–151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ozkan M, Altinbas M, Er O et al (2004) Post-operative sequential chemo-radiotherapy in high grade cerebral gliomas with fotemustine. J Chemother 16:298–302

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Frenay M, Lebrun C, Lonjon M et al (2000) Up-front chemotherapy with fotemustine/cisplatin/etoposide regimen in the treatment of 33 non-removable glioblastomas. Eur J Cancer 36:1026–1031

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:987–996

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Athanassiou H, Synodinou M, Maragoudakis E et al (2005) Randomised phase II study of temozolomide and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. J Clin Oncol 23:2372–2377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Westphal M, Hilt DC, Bortey E et al (2003) A phase 3 trial of local chemotherapy with biodegradable carmustine (BCNU) wafers (Gliadel wafers) in patients with primary malignant glioma. Neur-oncol 5:79–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Buckner JC, Ballman KV, Michalak JC et al (2006) Phase III trial of carmustine and cisplatin compared with carmustine alone and standard radiation therapy or accelerated radiation therapy in patients with glioblastoma multiforme: North Central Cancer Treatment Group 93–72-52 and Southwest Oncology Group 9503 Trials. J Clin Oncol 24:3871–3879

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Curran WJ, Scott JB, Horton J et al (1993) Recursive partitioning analysis of prognostic factors in three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group malignant glioma trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:704–710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Scott CB, Scarantino C, Urtasun R et al (1998) Validation and predictive power of radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) recursive partitioning analysis classes for malignant glioma patients: a report using RTOG 90–06. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 40:51–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick D. Beauchesne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beauchesne, P.D., Taillandier, L., Bernier, V. et al. Concurrent radiotherapy: fotemustine combination for newly diagnosed malignant glioma patients, a phase II study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 64, 171–175 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-009-0993-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-009-0993-x

Keywords

Navigation