Successful re-challenge with panitumumab in patients who developed hypersensitivity reactions to cetuximab: report of three cases and review of literature
- 362 Downloads
Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are effective in treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Cetuximab, a chimeric MAb targets EGFR. Even with premedication, cetuximab can cause a hypersensitivity reaction (HSR). In case of severe HSR, further therapy with cetuximab is contraindicated, thus preventing these patients from receiving potentially beneficial anti-EGFR therapy. Panitumumab is a fully human MAb also targets EGFR. To date, no human antihuman Ab have been detected, and unlike CET, HSR are infrequent, and no premedication is required. Safety of panitumumab in patients with a previous severe HSR with cetuximab is not fully known. We present three patients with GI cancers who tolerated panitumumab without HSR after experiencing severe HSR to cetuximab.
Patients and methods
Three patients were challenged with standard dose of panitumumab (6 mg/kg) after experiencing grade 3 HSR to standard dose of cetuximab under strict observation and no premedication. First patient, a 58-year-old male with mCRC developed grade 3 HSR during 8th dose of cetuximab. Second patient was a 58-year-old female with mCRC developed grade 3 HSR during 12th dose of cetuximab. Third patient was a 61-year-old male with pancreatic cancer who experienced grade 3 HSR during loading dose of cetuximab. Charts were reviewed to find history of prior allergy, including H1 blocker use, drug allergy, bee sting allergy, eczema, allergic reactive airways disease, or food allergy.
All patients were Caucasians with an average age of 59 year with no history of prior allergy. No patient received any premedication. First patient received panitumumab for 2 months, second patient was treated for 6 months, and third patient who was rechallenged 1 week after HSR to cetuximab had a partial response following 6 months of therapy.
HSR are serious complications associated with MAbs. Thanks to hybridoma technology that newer generations of MAbs contain less or no mouse-specific protein sequences, hence reducing the risk of HSR. Identification of individuals likely to develop severe and sometimes life-threatening HSR is challenging. Our report of three patients successfully treated with panitumumab after they had severe HSR to cetuximab warrant further investigation.
KeywordsPanitumumab Epidermal growth factor (EGFR) Colorectal cancer Cetuximab
- 4.Khazaeli MB, LoBuglio AF, Falcey JW et al (2000) Low immunogenicity of a chimeric monoclonal antibody (MAb), IMC-C225, used to treat epidermal growth factor receptor-positive tumors. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 19:207a Abs 808Google Scholar
- 9.Patel DD, Goldberg RM (2006) Cetuximab-associated infusion reactions: pathology and management. Oncology (Williston Park) 20(11):1373–1382Google Scholar
- 12.Kullmann F, Hollerbach S, Dollinger MJ (2007) Cetuximab plus gemcitabine/oxaliplatin (GEMOXCET) in 1st line metastatic pancreatic cancer. First results from a multicenter phase II study. Gastrointestinal cancers symposium Abs 128Google Scholar
- 16.Roskos L, Lohner M, Schwab G (2001) A biomathematical model of neoplastic cell growth and prediction on silico of effective doses of ABX-EGF in cancer patients. Proced Am Assoc Cancer Res 42:833 Abs 4471Google Scholar
- 17.Berlin J, Malik I, Picus J (2004) Panitumumab therapy with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leukovorin (IFL) in metastatic colorectal patients. Proc of the Eur Soc of Med Onc Abs 265PDGoogle Scholar
- 18.Malik I, Hecht JR, Patnaik A, Venook A, Berlin J, Croghan G, Navale L, MacDonald M, Jerian S, Meropol NJ (2005) Safety and Efficacy of panitumumab monotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol Abs 3520Google Scholar
- 19.Hecht JR, Berlin J, Malik I, Picus J, Glisson S, Kozloff M, Spitzer G, Arends R, Hollifield A, Yang B (2005) Panitumumab therapy with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leukovorin (IFL) in metastatic colorectal patients: a pharmacokinetic analysis. Program of the Am Soc Clin Onc. Gastrointestinal cancers symposium Abs 259Google Scholar
- 24.Chung CH, Mirakhur B, Chan E, Le QT, Berlin J, Morse M, Murphy BA, Satinover SM, Hosen J, Mauro D, Slebos RJ, Zhou Q, Gold D, Hatley T, Hicklin DJ, Platts-Mills TA (2008) Cetuximab-induced anaphylaxis and IgE specific for galactose-alpha-1, 3-galactose. N Engl J Med 358(11):1109–1117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Adédoyin J, Gronlund H, Oman H, Johansson SG, van Hage M (2007) Cat IgA representative of new carbohydrate cross-reactive allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol 119(3):640–645Google Scholar