The cardio-protecting agent and topoisomerase II catalytic inhibitor sobuzoxane enhances doxorubicin-DNA adduct mediated cytotoxicity
- 334 Downloads
The importance of understanding the mechanism of action of anticancer agents is sometimes overlooked in the pursuit of new and therapeutically advantageous compounds. Doxorubicin has long been identified as an inhibitor of the DNA-decatenating enzyme topoisomerase II, this being believed to be the major mechanism of action of this drug. However, the complex nature of cytotoxicity induced by doxorubicin suggests that more than one mechanism of action is responsible for cell kill. Investigation into various other cellular effects has shown that doxorubicin can, in the presence of formaldehyde, form doxorubicin-DNA adducts, resulting in enhanced cell death.
We have used six catalytic inhibitors of topoisomerase II (aclarubicin, merbarone, suramin, staurosporine, maleimide and sobuzoxane) to investigate the role of topoisomerase II mediated cell effects in doxorubicin-DNA adduct inducing treatments. Adduct levels were determined by scintillation counting of [14C]doxorubicin-DNA lesions and DNA damage responses by Comet analysis and flow cytometry (apoptosis).
Here we show that sobuzoxane inhibits topoisomerase II but in the presence of doxorubicin also enhances the production of doxorubicin-DNA adducts resulting in an enhanced cytotoxic response. We show that the formation of doxorubicin-DNA adducts is mediated by formaldehyde released from sobuzoxane when it is metabolised.
Sobuzoxane has also been shown to decrease the normally dose limiting cardiotoxicity commonly exhibited with clinical use of doxorubicin. The potential combination of doxorubicin and sobuzoxane in cancer chemotherapy has two advantages. First, the mechanism of doxorubicin toxicity is shifted away from topoisomerase II inhibition and towards drug-DNA adduct formation which may allow for a lower drug dose to be used and circumvent some drug resistance problems. Second, the addition of a cardioprotecting agent will counteract the commonly dose limiting side effect of cardiac damage resulting from doxorubicin treatment. The importance of the potentiation of cell kill of doxorubicin and sobuzoxane provides a rationalisation of a mechanistic-based combination of anticancer drugs for an improved clinical outcome.
KeywordsSobuzoxane Doxorubicin Formaldehyde Topoisomerase II Drug-DNA adducts
This work was carried out with the financial support of the Australian Research Council (SMC and DRP), grant 542/00-4 from the Israel Science Foundation (AR and AN) and the Marcus Center for Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry Bar Ilan University. We also acknowledge the receipt of an Australian Research Fellowship from the ARC (SMC).
- 1.DeVita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA (eds) (2005) Cancer: principles & practice of oncology. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 3.Doroshow JH (1995) Role of reactive-oxygen metabolism in cardiac toxicity of anthracycline antibiotics. In: Priebe W (ed) Anthracycline antibiotics: new analogues, methods of delivery, and mechanisms of action. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 259–267Google Scholar
- 8.Pommier Y (1995) DNA Topoisomerases and their inhibition by anthracyclines. Anthracycline antibiotics: new analogues, methods of delivery, and mechanisms of action. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 183–203Google Scholar
- 22.Jensen PB, Sorensen BS, Demant EJ, Sehested M, Jensen PS, Vindelov L, Hansen HH (1990) Antagonistic effect of aclarubicin on the cytotoxicity of etoposide and 4’-(9-acridinylamino)methanesulfon-m-anisidide in human small cell lung cancer cell lines and on topoisomerase II-mediated DNA cleavage. Cancer Res 50:3311–3316PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 48.Hasinoff BB, Wu X, Krokhin OV, Ens W, Standing KG, Nitiss JL, Sivaram T, Giorgianni A, Yang S, Jiang Y, Yalowich JC (2005) Biochemical and proteomics approaches to characterize topoisomerase IIalpha cysteines and DNA as targets responsible for cisplatin-induced inhibition of topoisomerase IIalpha. Mol Pharmacol 67:937–947PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar