Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology

, Volume 52, Issue 2, pp 147–152

Gemcitabine and vinorelbine as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a phase II study

  • Michela Donadio
  • Mara Ardine
  • Alfredo Berruti
  • Giuliana Ritorto
  • Elena Fea
  • Marinella Mistrangelo
  • Zaira Coccorullo
  • Paola Bergnolo
  • Alessandro Comandone
  • Oscar Bertetto
Original Article

Abstract

Background

To evaluate the feasibility and activity of gemcitabine and vinorelbine as a second/third-line approach in patients with advanced breast cancer.

Methods

Entered into the study were 51 consecutive patients. All had been previously treated with anthracyclines. Of these 51 patients, 36 had experienced failure or relapse after one chemotherapy line for advanced disease, and 15 after two chemotherapy lines. The dominant sites of involvement were brain in 4 patients (7.8%), liver in 22 (43.2%), lung in 10 (19.6%), bone in 10 (19.6), and soft-tissue in 5 (9.8%). Treatment consisted of vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 administered on days 1 and 8 every 21 days.

Results

The scheme was well tolerated. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 11% of patients. Grade 3 nausea and vomiting occurred in 6%, and grade 2 neurotoxicity in 6%. No patients experienced grade 3/4 alopecia. The median relative dose intensity was 94.6% (49.7–100%) and 90.0% (23.1–100%) for vinorelbine and gemcitabine, respectively. Two patients (3.9%) were not evaluable for disease response, 4 (7.8%) attained a clinical complete response, 13 (25.5%) a partial response (for an overall response rate of 33.3%, 95% coefficient interval 20.0–46.0%), 23 (45.2%) showed stable disease, and 9 (17.6%) progressed. The median time to progression of responding patients was 10.8 months, and the median overall survival of the entire population was 17.8 months.

Conclusions

Vinorelbine and gemcitabine is a manageable scheme with moderate activity in pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer.

Keywords

Gemcitabine Vinorelbine Second-line treatment Metastatic breast cancer Phase II 

References

  1. 1.
    Verdecchia A (1996) Survival in adult Italian cancer patients (1978–1989). ITACARE Working Group. Tumori 83:39–425Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hortobagyi GN (1994) Multidisciplinary management of advanced primary and metastatic breast cancer. Cancer 74 [1 Suppl 1]:416–423Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ellis MJ, Hayes DF, Lippman ME (2000) Treatment of metastatic breast cancer. In: Harris YR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK (eds) Diseases of the breast. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 749–787Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cardoso F, Di Leo A, Lohrisch C, Bernard C, Ferreira F, Piccart MJ (2002) Second and subsequent lines of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: what did we learn in the last two decades? Ann Oncol 13:197–207Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fellous A, Ohayon R, Vacassin T, Binet S, Lataste H, Krikorian A, Couzinier JP, Meininger V (1989) Biochemical effects of Navelbine on tubulin and associated proteins. Semin Oncol 16 [Suppl 4]:9–14Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Johnson SA, Harper P, Hortobagyi GN, Pouillart P (1996) Vinorelbine: an overview. Cancer Treat Rev 22:127–142PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gasparini G, Caffo O, Barni S, Frontini L, Testolin A, Guglielmi RB, Ambrosini G (1994) Vinorelbine is an active antiproliferative agent in pretreated advanced breast cancer patients: a phase II study. J Clin Oncol 12:2094–2101PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Weber BL, Vogel C, Jones S, Harvey H, Hutchins L, Bigley J, Hohneker J (1995) Intravenous vinorelbine as first-line and second-line therapy in advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 13:1245–1252Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Degardin M, Bonneterre J, Hecquet B, Pion JM, Adenis A, Horner D, Demaille A (1994) Vinorelbine (Navelbine) as salvage treatment for advanced breast cancer. Ann Oncol 5:423–426PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hertel LW, Kroin JS, Misner JW, Tustin JM (1988) Synthesis of 2-deoxy-2′,2′-difluoro-D-ribose and 2-deoxy-2′,2′'-difluoro-D-ribofuranosyl nucleosides. J Org Chem 53:2406–2409Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hertel LW, Boder GB, Kroin JS, Rinzel SM, Porre G, Todd GC, Grindey GB (1990) Evaluation of the antitumor activity of gemcitabine (2′,2′-difluoro-2′-deoxycitidine). Cancer Res 50:4417–4422PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Luftner D, Flath B, Akrivakis C, Grunewald R, Mergenthaler HG, Possiger K (1998) Gemcitabine for palliative treatment in metastatic breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 124:527–531CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Seidman AD (2001) The evolving role of gemcitabine in the management of breast cancer. Oncology 60:189–198CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lorusso V, Carpagnano F, Frasci G, Panza N, Di Rienzo G, Cisternino ML, Napoli G, Orlando S, Cinieri S, Brunetti C, Palazzo S, De Lena M (2000) Phase I/II study of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy of non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 18:405–411PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krajnik G, Mohn-Staudner A, Thaler J, Greil R, Schmeikal S, Marhold F, Deutsch J, Preiss P, Malayari R, Schafer-Prokop C, Wein W, Huber H, Pirker R (2000) Vinorelbine-gemcitabine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): an AASLC phase II trial. Ann Oncol 11:993–998CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gianni L, Munzone E, Capri G, Fulfaro F, Tarenzi E, Villani F, Spreafico C, Laffranchi A, Caraceni A, Martini C (1995) Paclitaxel by three-hour infusion in combination with bolus doxorubicin in women with untreated metastatic breast cancer: high antitumor efficacy and cardiac effects in a dose-finding and sequence-finding study. J Clin Oncol 13:2688–2699PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dogliotti L, Berruti A, Buniva T, Zola P, Bau MG, Farris A, Sarobba MG, Bottini A, Alquati P, Deltetto F, Gosso P, Monzeglio C, Moro G, Sussio M, Perroni D (1996) Lonidamine significantly increases the activity of epirubicin in advanced breast cancer patients: results from a multicenter prospective randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 14:1165–1172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Haider K, Kornek GV, Kwasny W, Weinlander G, Valencak J, Lang F, Puribauer F, Kovats E, Depisch D, Scheithauer W (1999) Treatment of advanced breast cancer with gemcitabine and vinorelbine plus human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor. Breast Cancer Res Treat 55:203–211CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nicolaides C, Dimopoulos MA, Samantas E, Bafaloukos D, Kalofonos C, Fountzilas G, Razi E, Kosmidis P, Pavlidis N (2000) Gemcitabine and vinorelbine as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer progressing after first-line taxane-based chemotherapy: a phase II study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group. Ann Oncol 11:873–875CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Valenza R, Leonardi V, Gebbia V, Agostara B (2000) Gemcitabine and vinorelbine in pretreated advanced breast cancer. A pilot study. Ann Oncol 11:495–496CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hortobagyi G (2001) Treatment of advanced breast cancer with gemcitabine and vinorelbine. Oncology (Huntingt) 15 [Suppl 3]:15–17Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mariani G, Tagliabue P, Zucchinelli P, Brambilla C, Demicheli R, Villa E, Marchiaro A, Valagussa P, Bonadonna G, Gianni L (2001) Phase I/II study of gemcitabine in association with vinorelbine for metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 70:163–169CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stathopoulos GP, Rigatos SK, Pergantas N, Tsavdarides D, Athanasiadis I, Malamos NA, Stathopoulos JG (2002) Phase II trial of biweekly administration of vinorelbine and gemcitabine in pretreated advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:37–41CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A (1981) Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 47:207–214PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Simon R (1989) Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 10:1–10PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Porkka K, Blomqvist C, Rissanen P, Elomea I, Pyrhonen S (1994) Salvage therapies in women who fail to respond to first-line treatment with fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide for advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 12:1639–1647PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Buzdar AU, Asmar L, Hortobagyi GN (1997) Impact of patient characteristics on treatment outcome: anthracycline resistance. Eur J Cancer 33 [Suppl 7]:S3–S6Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Berruti A, Sperone P, Bottini A, Gorzegno G, Lorusso V, Brunelli A, Botta M, Tampellini M, Donadio M, Mancarella S, De Lena M, Alquati P, Dogliotti L (2000) Phase II study of vinorelbine with protracted fluorouracil infusion as a second- or third-line approach for advanced breast cancer patients previously treated with anthracyclines. J Clin Oncol 18:3370–3377PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michela Donadio
    • 1
  • Mara Ardine
    • 1
  • Alfredo Berruti
    • 2
  • Giuliana Ritorto
    • 1
  • Elena Fea
    • 1
  • Marinella Mistrangelo
    • 1
  • Zaira Coccorullo
    • 1
  • Paola Bergnolo
    • 3
  • Alessandro Comandone
    • 3
  • Oscar Bertetto
    • 1
  1. 1.Oncologia Medica, Centro Oncologico Ematologico SubalpinoAzienda Ospedaliera MolinetteTurinItaly
  2. 2.Oncologia MedicaAzienda Ospedaliera San LuigiOrbassanoItaly
  3. 3.Oncologia MedicaOspedale GradenigoTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations