Chronic myeloid leukemia patients in Tunisia: epidemiology and outcome in the imatinib era (a multicentric experience)
Data are limited in developing countries regarding the clinicopathologic features and response to therapy of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in the era of imatinib (IM). The objective of this study is to report on the clinicoepidemiologic features of CML in Tunisia, to evaluate the long-term outcome of patients in chronic (CP) or accelerated phase (AP) treated with IM 400 mg daily as frontline therapy, and to determine imatinib’s efficacy and safety. From October 2002 to December 2014, 410 CML patients were treated with IM in six Tunisian departments of hematology. Response (hematologic, cytogenetic, and molecular responses) and outcome—overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and progression-free survival (PFS)—were evaluated. The following prognostic factors were analyzed for their impact on the European leukemia net (ELN) response, OS, EFS, and PFS at 5 years: age, sex, leukocyte count, Sokal score, European Treatment and Outcome Study (EUTOS) score, CML phase, time to starting IM, and impact of adverse events. The median age was 45 years (3–85 years). Two hundred ten (51.2%) patients were male. Splenomegaly was present in 322 of the 410 (79%). Additional cytogenetic abnormalities were encountered in 25 (6.3%) patients. At diagnosis, 379 (92.4%) patients were in CP, 31 (7.6%) were in AP. The Sokal risk was low in 87 (22.5%), intermediate in 138 (35.7%), and high in 164 patients (41.9%). The EUTOS risk was low in 217 (74%), and high in 77 (26%) patients. The rates of cumulative complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), major molecular response (MMR), and molecular response 4/5 log (MR4.5) in CP/AP-CML patients were 72, 68.4, and 46.4%, respectively. The median time to reach CCyR, MMR, and MR4.5 was 6 months (3–51), 18 months (3–72), and 24 months (3–100), respectively. According to the ELN criteria, optimal, suboptimal response, and failure were noted in 206 (51.8%), 61 (15.3%), and 125 (31.4%) patients, respectively. Five-year event-free survival (EFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 81, 90, and 90%, respectively. By multivariate analysis, AP, high EUTOS risk, and baseline WBC ≥ 150G/l remained independent predictive factors of non-optimal response to IM. The adverse events (AE) of IM were moderate and tolerable. With the caveats that the monitoring of the disease was not optimal, response rates were similar to those reported in previous studies. It is clear to us that improvements should be made in treatment of AP-CML and high Sokal risk group of CP-CML. The frontline use of second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) is expected to improve the results of the first-line treatment of these high-risk Tunisian patients, but cost and accessibility of this therapy remain the problems in developing countries.
KeywordsTunisia Clinical practice CML Imatinib Management Survey
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 4.Baccarani M, Saglio G, Goldman J, Hochhaus A, Simonsson B, Appelbaum F, Apperley J, Cervantes F, Cortes J, Deininger M, Gratwohl A, Guilhot F, Horowitz M, Hughes T, Kantarjian H, Larson R, Niederwieser D, Silver R, Hehlmann R, European LeukemiaNet (2006) Evolving concepts in the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: recommendations from an expert panel on behalf of the European Leukemia Net. Blood 108(6):1809–1820. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-02-005686 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Baccarani M, Cortes J, Pane F, Niederwieser D, Saglio G, Apperley J, Cervantes F, Deininger M, Gratwohl A, Guilhot F, Hochhaus A, Horowitz M, Hughes T, Kantarjian H, Larson R, Radich J, Simonsson B, Silver RT, Goldman J, Hehlmann R, European LeukemiaNet (2009) Chronic myeloid leukemia: an update of concepts and management recommendations of European LeukemiaNet. JCO 27(35):6041–6051. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.0779 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Aguayo A, Garcia-Alvarez E, Cazares-Ordonez Y, Crespo-Solis E, Martinez-Baños D, Guadarrama-Beltran E, Cervera-Ceballos EE, Lopez-Karpovitch X (2008) Chronic myeloid leukemia: a clinicoepidemiologic and therapeutic description of a single institution in Mexico City. Clin Leuk 2(4):261–266. https://doi.org/10.3816/CLK.2008.n.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Kantarjian HM, O’Brien S, Cortes J et al (2003) Imatinib mesylate therapy improves survival in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia in the chronic phase: comparison with historic data. Cancer 98(12):2636–2642. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11831 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Rodrigues Lemos JA, Quinto Bentes A, Simões Beltrão AC et al (2010) Late diagnosis and delayed treatment combined as a cause of suboptimal response to imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia in developing countries, 116. Blood, Dent Abstr 4750Google Scholar
- 14.Hasford J, Baccarani M, Hoffmann V, Guilhot J, Saussele S, Rosti G, Guilhot F, Porkka K, Ossenkoppele G, Lindoerfer D, Simonsson B, Pfirrmann M, Hehlmann R (2011) Predicting complete cytogenetic response and subsequent progression-free survival in 2060 patients with CML on imatinib treatment: the EUTOS score. Blood 118(3):686–692. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-12-319038 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Zelada J, Capurro MPA, Rojas B et al (2013) Is EUTOS score predictive of outcome in patients with early chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia treated with imatinib? Preliminary data from the National Protocol of the Chilean Cooperative Group Panda. Blood 122(21):5196Google Scholar
- 16.Oyekunle AA, Osho PO, Aneke JC et al (2012) The predictive value of the Sokal and Hasford scoring systems in chronic myeloid leukaemia in the imatinib era. J Hematol Malig 2:25–32Google Scholar
- 19.Hehlmann R, Lauseker M, Jung-Munkwitz S, Leitner A, Müller MC, Pletsch N, Proetel U, Haferlach C, Schlegelberger B, Balleisen L, Hänel M, Pfirrmann M, Krause SW, Nerl C, Pralle H, Gratwohl A, Hossfeld DK, Hasford J, Hochhaus A, Saußele S (2011) Tolerability-adapted imatinib 800 mg/d versus 400 mg/d versus 400 mg/d plus interferon-α in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 29(12):1634–1642. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.32.0598 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Jain P, Kantarjian H, Nazha A, O'Brien S, Jabbour E, Romo CG, Pierce S, Cardenas-Turanzas M, Verstovsek S, Borthakur G, Ravandi F, Quintas-Cardama A, Cortes J (2013) Early responses predict better outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: results with four tyrosine kinase inhibitor modalities. Blood 121(24):4867–4874. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-03-490128 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar