Relationship between mandibular condyle and articular eminence cortication with mandibular cortical index on cone-beam CT
- 30 Downloads
Mandibular condyle development can be evaluated with radiographic evaluation of subchondral cortical bone. The aim of this study is to investigate mandibular condyle cortication (MCC), articular eminence cortication (AEC) and mandibular cortical index (MCI) according to age and gender on CBCT, and relationship between each other.
CBCT scans of 520 patients (312 male and 208 female, age range 7–84) were retrospectively investigated to evaluate MCC, AEC and MCI. MCC and AEC were examined in sagittal section and MCI in panoramic reformatted image. MCC and AEC were classified as Type I, Type II and Type III according to density difference between the cortical bone enclosing condyle and articular eminence. Categorical variables were tested by Chi square.
When MCC, AEC and MCI were compared, a significant relationship was detected (p < 0.05). According to age, there was a significant difference between MCC, MCI and AEC types with each other (p < 0.05). No significant discrepancy was found between gender and MCC, AEC and MCI (p > 0.05).
This study evaluated the distribution of MCC, AEC, MCI according to age and gender and detected that these cortications were correlated. This result may be caused by anatomical proximity bone components and functional stimuli. Knowledge of these cortications can be important for accurate diagnosis of TMJ disorders and may also be helpful for prediction of osteoporotic changes.
KeywordsMandibular condyle Cortical bone Temporomandibular joint Cone-beam computed tomography
No funding resource is associated with this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Formal consent is not required.
This retrospective study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Gaziantep University (Decision No: 2019/29) and conducted in the Dentomaxillofacial Radiology Department of Gaziantep University, Faculty of Dentistry.
- 1.Ahmad M, Hollender L, Anderson Q, Kartha K, Ohrbach R, Truelove EL et al (2009) Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD): development of image analysis criteria and examiner reliability for image analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 107:844–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Arnett GW, McLaughlin RP (2004) Diagnosis the case. In: Arnett GW, McLaughlin RP (eds) Facial and dental planning for orthodontists and oral surgeons, 1st edn. Mosby, California, pp 145–146Google Scholar
- 17.Liu YY, Wang H, Yang ZY, Ba K, Li MX, Liu L (2010) The correlation between temporomandibular joint maturity and second molar root development in adolescents. Int J Stomatol 37:154–156Google Scholar
- 21.Rozylo-Kalinowska I, Orhan K (2019) Imaging of the Temporomandibular Joint. In: Rozylo-Kalinowska I, Orhan K (eds) Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in TMJ imaging, 1st edn. Springer Nature, Switzerland, pp 125–131Google Scholar
- 26.White SC, Pharoah MJ (2014) Oral radiology: principles and interpretation. In: White SC, Pharoah MJ (eds) Cone beam computed tomograph: anatomy, 7th edn. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 214–228Google Scholar