Canalis sinuosus: anatomical variation or structure?
- 10 Downloads
The main goal of the present study was to verify the presence, spatial location, the end of the canalis sinuosus (CS) trajectory and size of CS using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to characterise it as either a structure or an anatomical variation.
A trained examiner specialist in dental radiology and imagenology selected 200 CBCT images of the maxilla from 107 (53.5%) female and 93 (46.5%) male individuals aged between 18 and 85 years.
A total of 133 (66.5%) patients had CS, being 61 (45.86%) unilateral and 72 (54.14%) bilateral. A higher frequency of CS was observed in males (P < 0.05) and no relationship was found between its presence and age. The end of the CS trajectory was more frequent in the regions of central incisor (n = 91; 44.39%), followed by lateral incisor (n = 45; 21.95%) and canine (n = 29; 14.15%). In our sample, the majority of these canals had a diameter of up to 1 mm (n = 198/205; 96.6%). No statistically significant relationship between diameter and the end of the CS trajectory, with location (i.e. bilateral or unilateral) was found. Gender and age had no influence on diameter, spatial location and the end of the CS trajectory (P > 0.05%).
As CS was frequently found in our sample, it can be considered an anatomical structure, and as such, it is fundamental that the dentist requests a CBCT examination before performing any invasive procedure in the maxillary region to preserve this important structure.
KeywordsCanalis sinuosus Cone beam computed tomography Anatomical variation Anatomical structure Maxilla
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- 1.Arruda JA, Silva P, Silva L, Álvares P, Silva L, Zavanelli R, Rodrigues C, Gerbi M, Sobral AP, Silveira M (2017) Dental implant in the canalis sinuosus: a case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Dent 8:1–5Google Scholar
- 3.Ghandourah AO, Rashad A, Heiland M, Hamzi BM, Friedrich RE (2017) Cone-beam tomographic analysis of canalis sinuosus accessory intraosseous canals in the maxilla. Ger Med Sci 15:1–12Google Scholar
- 7.Kose EMRE, Sekerci AE, Soylu E, Nazlim S (2014) An extremely rare anatomical variation bilateral canalis sinuosus and nasopalatine duct cyst and role of TCCB in diagnosis. Int J Sci Res 23:361–363Google Scholar
- 10.Manhães LRC Jr, Villaça-Carvalho MF, Moraes ME, Lopes SL, Silva MB, Junqueira JL (2016) Location and classification of canalis sinuosus for cone beam computed tomography: avoiding misdiagnosis. Bras Oral Res 30:e49Google Scholar