Advertisement

Comments about the article “A Crouzon syndrome from the classic period of Maya civilization?” The art historian’s point of view

  • Olivier TrostEmail author
  • Stéphane Micoud
  • Fabrice Duparc
Letter to the Editor
  • 6 Downloads

Dear Sir,

We read with great interest the article by Deps and Charlier, and entitled “A Crouzon syndrome from the classic period of Maya civilization?” [2]. We first would like to congratulate the authors for their valuable contribution to the journal, and for this interesting presentation of a very nice work of art of a civilization little known to the public. However, this report inspired us some considerations about the medical approach of the arts.

Paleodiagnostical analysis is based on the assumption that the work realistically represents an individual who has formally existed. The idea of portrait is not obvious at first sight. The fact sheet referencing the work in the Quai Branly–Jacques Chirac Museum’s collections cautiously evokes a different interpretation [6]: “The character seems to be a deity related to agriculture”. The identification of the subject as the representation of a person who really existed, with morphological traits allowing recognition of the individual, is...

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    De Grève M, De Grève C (2000) Contexte. In: Grassin JM, Dictionnaire international des termes littéraires, Association internationale de littérature comparée, Limoges, FranceGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deps P, Charlier P (2019) A Crouzon syndrome from the classic period of Maya civilization? Surg Radiol Anat.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-019-02287-8 (Epub ahead of print) PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Michelet D, Melendez JC (2011) Maya de l’aube au crépuscule : les collections du Guatemala. Somogy Editions d’Art, ParisGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lepape S (2015) Allégorie de François Ier en divinités antiques. In: Petey-Girard B, Vène M (eds) François Ier pouvoir et image. BNF, ParisGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pomarède V, Guégan S, Prat LA, Bertin E (2006) Ingres (1780-1867). Musée du Louvre Ed. Gallimard, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Quai Branly—Jacques Chirac Museum (2019) Explorer les collections. http://www.quaibranly.fr/fr/explorer-les-collections/base/Work/action/show/notice/164849-vase-fragment/page/2/. Accessed 2019

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olivier Trost
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Stéphane Micoud
    • 1
  • Fabrice Duparc
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Anatomy, Rouen Faculty of MedicineRouen Normandy UniversityRouenFrance
  2. 2.Laboratory of Medical Informatics and Knowledge Engineering in e-Health, LIMICSInserm, Rouen Normandy University, Sorbonne University, University of Paris 13ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations