Correlation of anterior overbite with root position and buccal bone thickness of maxillary anterior teeth: a CBCT study
- 82 Downloads
To investigate the correlation of anterior overbite with the sagittal root position (SRP) and buccal bone thickness (BBT) of the maxillary anterior teeth.
Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) data of southern Chinese patients who underwent CBCT examinations between November 2016 and December 2016 were collected. The anterior overbite was the predictor variable while the SRP and the BBT at 4 mm apical to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ-4) and midpoint of the root of the maxillary anterior teeth were set as the primary and secondary outcome variables, respectively. All measurements were done by two calibrated examiners. Correlations between variables were analyzed by the Spearman’s correlation coefficient. The significance level was set at P < 0.05.
CBCT data of 146 patients (65 men and 81 women) with a mean age of 44.2 ± 13.4 years were analyzed, and of the 876 maxillary anterior teeth evaluated, 9.8% were presented with deep overbites. Most of roots of the anterior teeth (94.9%) were positioned against the buccal cortical plate, of which, in 63.8% of them the apex was not covered by bone along the long axis of the tooth. The mean BBT at CEJ-4 was 0.89 mm at the central incisor, 0.85 mm at the lateral incisor and 0.84 mm at the canine. The overbite was positively correlated with SRP Class I subtypes and the BBT at CEJ-4 (P < 0.05).
Deep overbite was more frequently accompanied by bone fenestration in the anterior maxillary areas.
KeywordsOcclusion Overbite Buccal bone thickness Sagittal root position CBCT Maxillary anterior teeth
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81400550, 81600914, and 81470783).
RS: data collection and data analysis, and manuscript writing; XL: data collection and data analysis and literature research; SC: data collection and data analysis; ZL: literature research and manuscript editing; ZTC: literature research and manuscript editing; EHNP: manuscript editing; ZFC: project development, data collection and data analysis, manuscript writing, and editing; BH: project development, data collection and data analysis, manuscript writing, and editing.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ethical Committee of Guanghua School of Stomatology, Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University (ERC--32) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
This study was retrospective, and it did not alter the management of the patients; thus, no specific consent was required.
- 2.Benic GI, Mokti M, Chen CJ, Weber HP, Hammerle CH, Gallucci GO (2012) Dimensions of buccal bone and mucosa at immediately placed implants after 7 years: a clinical and cone beam computed tomography study. Clin Oral Implants Res 23:560–566. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02253.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC (2004) Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19(Suppl):43–61Google Scholar
- 10.Cosyn J, Eghbali A, Hanselaer L, De Rouck T, Wyn I, Sabzevar MM, Cleymaet R, De Bruyn H (2013) Four modalities of single implant treatment in the anterior maxilla: a clinical, radiographic, and aesthetic evaluation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 15:517–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00417.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Gross MD (2008) Occlusion in implant dentistry. A review of the literature of prosthetic determinants and current concepts. Aust Dent J 53 Suppl 1:S60–68. doi:10.1111/j.1834–7819.2008.00043.xGoogle Scholar
- 16.Hartlev J, Kohberg P, Ahlmann S, Andersen NT, Schou S, Isidor F (2014) Patient satisfaction and esthetic outcome after immediate placement and provisionalization of single-tooth implants involving a definitive individual abutment. Clin Oral Implants Res 25:1245–1250. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12260 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Kan JY, Roe P, Rungcharassaeng K, Patel RD, Waki T, Lozada JL, Zimmerman G (2011) Classification of sagittal root position in relation to the anterior maxillary osseous housing for immediate implant placement: a cone beam computed tomography study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 26:873–876Google Scholar
- 20.Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Lozada J (2003) Immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: 1-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18:31–39Google Scholar
- 23.Lin CY, Pan WL, Wang HL (2018) Facial fenestration and dehiscence defects associated with immediate implant placement without flap elevation in anterior maxillary ridge: a preliminary cone beam computed tomography study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 33:1112–1118. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.6575 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Wang HM, Shen JW, Yu MF, Chen XY, Jiang QH, He FM (2014) Analysis of facial bone wall dimensions and sagittal root position in the maxillary esthetic zone: a retrospective study using cone beam computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 29:1123–1129. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3348 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Xu D, Wang Z, Sun L, Lin Z, Wan L, Li Y, Lin X, Peng W, Zhang Z, Gao Y (2016) Classification of the root position of the maxillary central incisors and its clinical significance in immediate implant placement. Implant Dent 25:520–524. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000438 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Yan Q, Xiao LQ, Su MY, Mei Y, Shi B (2016) Soft and hard tissue changes following immediate placement or immediate restoration of single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 31:1327–1340. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.4668 CrossRefGoogle Scholar