Advertisement

Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy

, Volume 41, Issue 4, pp 447–454 | Cite as

Vascular anatomy of the free fibula flap including the lateral head of the soleus muscle applied to maxillo-mandibular reconstruction

  • Lara Nokovitch
  • Julien Davrou
  • François Bidault
  • Bernard Devauchelle
  • Stéphanie Dakpé
  • Christian VacherEmail author
Original Article
  • 59 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Initially described by Baudet in 1982, the fibula flap including the lateral head of the soleus muscle allows a one-stage reconstruction for large maxillo-mandibular defects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the number of muscular branches destined to the soleus muscle and their distance from the origin of the fibular artery, to assess the vascular anatomy of the free fibula flap including the lateral head of the soleus muscle applied to maxillo-mandibular reconstruction.

Methods

We performed a cadaveric anatomic study on ten lower limbs, and a CT angiography anatomic study on 38 legs. The number of soleus branches originating from the fibular artery, and the distance between the origin of the fibular artery and each of the identified branches were measured.

Results

The number of soleus branches destined to the lateral head of the soleus muscle is variable, with in our study 1–3 branches found. Soleus branches destined to the lateral head of the soleus muscle emerged at a distance ranging between 0 and 2.9 cm (mean value = 1.82 cm) from the origin of the fibular artery in 40% of cases, between 3 and 5.9 cm (mean value = 4.27 cm) from the origin of the fibular artery in 37% of cases, and was at a distance of 6 cm or more (mean value = 6.93 cm) from the origin of the fibular artery in 20% of cases.

Conclusions

An origin of the soleus vessels in close proximity to the origin of the fibular artery represents the main limitation of this flap, the length of the remaining fibular pedicle making it difficult to achieve secure anastomosis in the cervical area. The vascular distribution of the proximal part of the lateral head of the soleus muscle being segmental, it is possible to lengthen the flap pedicle ligating the most proximal soleus branches originating from the fibular artery.

Keywords

Fibula flap Soleus muscle Reconstruction Pedicle length CT angiography Cadaveric study 

Notes

Author contributions

LN: protocol development, data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing. JD: data analysis, manuscript writing. FB: data collection. BD: other. SD: other. CV: protocol development, data analysis, manuscript writing and editing.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

We have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. 1.
    Balasubramanian D, Thankappan K, Kuriakose MA et al (2012) Reconstructive indications of simultaneous double free flaps in the head and neck: a case series and literature review. Microsurgery 32:423–430.  https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.21963 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baudet J, Panconi B, Caix P (1982) The composite fibula and soleus free transfer. Int J Microsurg 4:10Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blackwell KE, Urken ML (1996) Iliac crest free flap. Facial Plast Surg FPS 12:35–43.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1064491 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chang EI, Yu P (2017) Prospective series of reconstruction of complex composite mandibulectomy defects with double island free fibula flap. J Surg Oncol 116:258–262.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24647 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cheng M-H, Saint-Cyr M, Ali RS et al (2009) Osteomyocutaneous peroneal artery-based combined flap for reconstruction of composite and en bloc mandibular defects. Head Neck 31:361–370.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.20969 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    El Zawawy EMM, El Sekily NM (2012) An anatomical study of the blood supply of the soleus muscle in humans. Alex J Med 48:315–321.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajme.2012.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ersoy B, Sönmez A, Bayramiçli M (2011) Sternocleidomastoid region restoration with lateral hemisoleus muscle incorporatied in free fibular flap for reconstruction of radical neck dissection and hemimandibulectomy. Microsurgery 31:401–403.  https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.20908 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fathi M, Hassanzad Azar M, Arab Kheradmand A, Shahidi S (2011) Anatomy of arterial supply of the soleus muscle. Acta Med Iran 49:237–240Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fayman MS, Orak F, Hugo B, Berson SD (1987) The distally based split soleus muscle flap. Br J Plast Surg 40:20–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Foy J-P, Qassemyar Q, Assouly N et al (2016) Harvesting technique of chimeric multiple paddles fibular flap for wide oromandibular defects. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 61:292–297.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anplas.2015.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Garvey PB, Chang EI, Selber JC et al (2012) A prospective study of preoperative computed tomographic angiographic mapping of free fibula osteocutaneous flaps for head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:541e–549e.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318262f115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gérard R, Rizzo C, Hu W et al (2010) Lambeau d’hémi-soléaire latéral en îlot vasculaire à pédicule fibulaire distal: une nouvelle option pour traiter les défects cutanés de la jambe. Rev Chir Orthopédique Traumatol 96:S54–S59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcot.2010.03.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hanasono MM, Corbitt CA, Yu P, Skoracki RJ (2014) Success of sequential free flaps in head and neck reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg JPRAS 67:1186–1193.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2014.05.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hidalgo DA, Pusic AL (2002) Free-flap mandibular reconstruction: a 10-year follow-up study. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:438–449 (discussion 450–451) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huang Y-C, Leong C-P, Pong Y-P et al (2012) Functional assessment of donor-site morbidity after harvest of a fibula chimeric flap with a sheet of soleus muscle for mandibular composite defect reconstruction. Microsurgery 32:20–25.  https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.20955 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kannan RY, Mathur BS, Tzafetta K (2013) Single flap reconstruction for complex oro-facial defects using chimeric free fibular flap variants. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg JPRAS 66:358–363.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2012.10.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kheradmand AA, Garajei A, Kiafar M, Nikparto N (2016) Assessing the anatomical variability of deep circumflex iliac vessels in harvesting of iliac crest-free flap for mandibular reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg 27:e320–e323.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002576 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Konschake M, Brenner E (2014) “Mors auxilium vitae”—causes of death of body donors in an Austrian Anatomical Department. Ann Anat 196:387–393.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2014.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kuo Y-R, Shih H-S, Chen C-C et al (2010) Free fibula osteocutaneous flap with soleus muscle as a chimeric flap for reconstructing mandibular segmental defect after oral cancer ablation. Ann Plast Surg 64:738–742.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181a72f62 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Le Nen D, Rizzo C, Hu W et al (2009) The island hemisoleus flap on distal vascular pedicle: anatomical bases and clinical applications. Surg Radiol Anat SRA 31:715–721.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-009-0509-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McHanwell S, Brenner E, Chirculescu ARM, Drukker J, van Mameren H, Mazzotti G, Pais D, Paulsen F, Plaisant O, Caillaud M, Laforêt E, Riederer BM, Sanudo JR, Bueno-Lopez JL, Donate F, Sprumont P, Teofilovski-Parapid G, Moxham BJ (2008) The legal and ethical framework governing Body Donation in Europe—a review of current practice and recommendations for good practice. Eur J Anat 12:1–24Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mathes SJ, Nahai F (1981) Classification of the vascular anatomy of muscles: experimental and clinical correlation. Plast Reconstr Surg 67:177–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mo KWL, Vlantis A, Wong EWY, Chiu TW (2014) Double free flaps for reconstruction of complex/composite defects in head and neck surgery. Hong Kong Med J Xianggang Yi Xue Za Zhi 20:279–284.  https://doi.org/10.12809/hkmj134113 Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pelissier P, Casoli V, Demiri E et al (2000) Soleus-fibula free transfer in lower limb reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:567–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Prathapamchandra V, Prabhu LV, Pai MM et al (2015) Arterial supply to the soleus muscle: an anatomical study with emphasis on its application in the pedicle flap surgery. Surg Radiol Anat SRA 37:1055–1061.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-015-1485-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Raveendran SS, Kumaragama KGJL (2003) Arterial supply of the soleus muscle: anatomical study of 50 lower limbs. Clin Anat NY N 16:248–252.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.10098 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ribuffo D, Atzeni M, Saba L et al (2010) Clinical study of peroneal artery perforators with computed tomographic angiography: implications for fibular flap harvest. Surg Radiol Anat SRA 32:329–334.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-009-0559-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Riederer BM, Bolt S, Brenner E, Bueno-Lopez JL, Chirculescu ARM, Davies DC, De Caro R, Gerrits PO, McHanwell S, Pais D, Paulsen F, Plaisant O, Sendemir E, Stabile I, Moxham BJ (2012) The legal and ethical framework governing Body Donation in Europe—1st update on current practice. Eur J Anat 16:1–21Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Singh T, Andi K (2017) Iliolumbar artery: a useful pedicle for the iliac crest free flap in maxillofacial reconstruction. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55:270–273.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.12.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Taylor GI, Pan WR (1998) Angiosomes of the leg: anatomic study and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:599–616 (discussion 617–618) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tobin GR (1985) Hemisoleus and reversed hemisoleus flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 76:87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wagner AJ, Bayles SW (2008) The angular branch: maximizing the scapular pedicle in head and neck reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134:1214–1217.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.134.11.1214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wehage IC, Fansa H (2011) Complex reconstructions in head and neck cancer surgery: decision making. Head Neck Oncol 3:14.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-3284-3-14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wolff K-D, Bauer F, Dobritz M et al (2012) Further experience with the free soleus perforator flaps using CT-angiography as a planning tool—a preliminary study. J Cranio-Maxillo-fac Surg Off Publ Eur Assoc Cranio-Maxillo-fac Surg 40:e253–257.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2011.10.030 Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wong C-H, Ong Y-S, Chew K-Y et al (2009) The fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap incorporating the hemisoleus muscle for complex head and neck defects: anatomical study and clinical applications. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:1956–1964.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181bf83b0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Anatomy Laboratory of the University of Medicine Paris V René Descartes, AP-HP Surgical SchoolParisFrance
  2. 2.Department of Maxillo-Facial SurgeryUniversity Hospital of Amiens, Picardie Jules Verne UniversityAmiensFrance
  3. 3.Department of Maxillo-Facial SurgeryBeaujon Hospital, AP-HPClichyFrance
  4. 4.Radiology DepartmentGustave Roussy InstituteVillejuifFrance
  5. 5.University of Medicine Paris-DiderotParisFrance

Personalised recommendations