Advertisement

Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy

, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 133–140 | Cite as

Physical attractiveness: analysis of buttocks patterns for planning body contouring treatment

  • Gkionoul Nteli Chatzioglou
  • Figen GovsaEmail author
  • Ahmet Bicer
  • Mehmet Asim Ozer
  • Yelda Pinar
Original Article
  • 99 Downloads

Abstract

Background

As buttocks region is one of the most characteristic features of the ideal female body figure, the popularity of gluteal region contouring is on the rise. Perception of body form is influenced by its shape and size. Interventions to modify the form of this region are often difficult due to influence. The aim of this study is to investigate the attractiveness of various buttock shapes with the aid of a dedicated software.

Methods

Standard personal photographs of the lower body were obtained from 200 healthy volunteers. Linear analyses were made and anatomical perception was calculated according to reference points.

Results

Compared to males, all measurements concerning buttock dimensions were a significantly greater in females. Proportional assessments revealed that in females, the most attractive buttock waist-to-hip ratio was 0.75 from the posterior view. This ratio was 0.85 in males. From the lateral view, the most attractive buttocks have a waist-to-hip ratio of 0.70 in females. Positioning of the lateral prominence at the inferior gluteal fold was rated by 25% of the respondents as the most attractive in males from the posterior view. From the lateral view, the most prominent portion positioned at the midpoint (a 50:50 vertical ratio) was considered the most attractive for females.

Conclusions

These results suggest that utilizing digitalized reference values for a given body region may be an invaluable tool for determination of the correct fat volume, thus individualization of body contouring procedures. With the help of certain software, this research has shown that it is possible to measure the parameters of buttock, which may in turn be used to offer the best solution for any individual in quest for an improved buttocks form. New ideal waist-to-hip ratios of 0.7 update the previous standards.

Keywords

Buttocks Body contouring Buttock reshaping Thighs Liposuction Cosmetic surgery Lipodystrophy 

Notes

Author contributions

GNC: Data collection. FG: Conception and design; writing the article; statistical expertise. AB: Conception and design; writing the article. MAO: Protocol/project development. YP: Data collection and provision of materials.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All the authors certify that they have no potential conflicts of interest with any entity mentioned in this manuscript and that they received no specific financial support for this work.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Ali A (2011) Contouring of the gluteal region in women: enhancement and augmentation. Ann Plast Surg 67:209–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aly A, Mueller M (2014) Circumferential truncal contouring: the belt lipectomy. Clin Plast Surg 41:765–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Babuccu O, Kargi E, Hosnuter M, Babuccu B, Kiran S (2004) Morphology of the gluteal region in the female population 5 to 83 years of age. Aesthet Plast Surg 28:405–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Babuccu O, Gozil R, Ozmen S, Bahcelioglu M, Latifoglu O, Celebi MC (2002) Gluteal region morphology: the effect of the weight gain and aging. Aesthet Plast Surg 26:130–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bagheri H, Govsa SS, Pinar F, Ozer Y MA (2017) Digitalized analysis of philtral anatomy for planning individual treatment. Surg Radiol Anat 39:1183–1189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buchanan PJ, Nasajpour H, Mast BA (2013) Safety and efficacy of outpatient lower body lifting. Ann Plast Surg 70:493–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carloni R, De Runz A, Chaput B, Herlin C, Girard P, Watier E, Bertheuil N (2016) Circumferential contouring of the lower trunk: indications, operative techniques, and outcomes—a systematic review. Aesthet Plast Surg 40:652–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Centeno RF, Young VL (2006) Clinical anatomy in aesthetic gluteal body contouring surgery. Clin Plast Surg 33:347–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clavijo-Alvarez JA, Pannucci CJ, Oppenheimer AJ, Wilkins EG, Rubin JP (2011) Prevention of venous thromboembolism in body contouring surgery: a national survey of 596 ASPS surgeons. Ann Plast Surg 66:228Y232Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cuenca-Guerra R, Quezada J (2004) What makes buttocks beautiful? A review and classification of the determinants of gluteal beauty and the surgical techniques to achieve them. Aesth Plast Surg 28:340–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cuenca-Guerra R, Lugo-Beltran I (2006) Beautiful buttocks: characteristics and surgical techniques. Clin Plast Surg 33:321–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    De Meyere B, Mir-Mir S, Peñas J, Camenisch CC, Hedén P (2014) Stabilized hyaluronic acid gel for volume restoration and contouring of the buttocks: 24-month efficacy and safety. Aesthet Plast Surg 38(2):404–412Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Everett M, Morales R Jr, Newall G, Fortes PF, Hustak KL, Patronella CK, Mentz HA 3rd (2018) Safest practices for autologous buttock augmentation with fat grafting using a roller pump injection technique. Aesthet Surg J 38:751–762.  https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjx113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fischer JP, Wes AM, Serletti JM, Kovach SJ (2013) Complications in body contouring procedures: an analysis of 1797 patients from the 2005 to 2010 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program databases. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:1411–1420Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Freese J, Meland S (2002) Seven tenths incorrect: heterogeneity and change in the waist-to-hip ratios of Playboy centerfold models and Miss America pageant winners. J Sex Res 39:133–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gaxiola-García MA, Lugo-Beltrán I (2017) Redefining the ideal buttocks: a population analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 139:1023eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Harrison D, Selvaggi G (2007) Gluteal augmentation surgery: indications and surgical management. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 60:922–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heidekrueger PI, Sinno S, Tanna N, Szpalski C, Juran S, Schmauss D, Ehrl D, Ng R, Ninkovic M, Broer PN (2017) The ideal buttock size: a sociodemographic morphometric evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg 140:20e–32eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kaoutzanis C, Winocour J, Yeslev M, Gupta V, Asokan I, Roostaeian J, Grotting JC, Higdon KK (2018) Aesthetic surgical procedures in men: major complications and associated risk factors. Aesthet Surg J 38:429–441.  https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjx161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee EI, Roberts TL, Bruner TW (2009) Ethnic considerations in buttock aesthetics. Semin Plast Surg 23:232–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mendieta CG, Sood A (2018) Classification system for gluteal evaluation: revisited. Clin Plast Surg 45:159–177.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2017.12.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    de Pedroza L (2000) Fat transplantation to the buttocks and legs for aesthetic enhancement or correction of deformities: long-term results of large volumes of fat transplant. Dermatol Surg 26:1145–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Petti C, Stoneburner J, McLaughlin L (2016) Laser cellulite treatment and laser-assisted lipoplasty of the thighs and buttocks: combined modalities for single stage contouring of the lower body. Lasers Surg Med 48:14–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Richter DF, Stoff A (2014) Circumferential body contouring: the lower body lift. Clin Plast Surg 41:775–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Roberts TL III, Toledo LS, Badin AZ (2001) Augmentation of the buttocks by micro fat grafting. Aesthet Surg J 21:311–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Roberts TL III, Weinfeld AB, Bruner TW, Nguyen K (2006) Universal and ethnic ideals of beautiful buttocks are best obtained by autologous micro fat grafting and liposuction. Clin Plast Surg 33:371–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schmitt T, Jabbour S, Makhoul R, Noel W, Reguesse AS, Levan P (2018) Lower body lift in the massive weight loss patient: a new classification and algorithm for gluteal augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 141:625–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to Image J: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9(7):671–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Singh D (1993) Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio. J Pers Soc Psychol 65:293–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Singh D (1994) Ideal female body shape: role of body weight and waist-to-hip ratio. Int J Eat Disord 16:283–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Singh D (2006) Universal allure of the hourglass figure: an evolutionary theory of female physical attractiveness. Clin Plast Surg 33:359–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sirinturk S, Bagheri H, Govsa F, Pinar Y, Ozer MA (2017) Study of frontal hairline patterns for natural design and restoration. Surg Radiol Anat 39:679–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Toledo LS (2015) Gluteal augmentation with fat grafting: the Brazilian buttock technique: 30 years’ experience. Clin Plast Surg 42:253–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wong WW, Motakef S, Lin Y, Gupta SC (2016) Redefining the ideal buttocks: a population analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 137:1739–1747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wong MS (2016) Post-bariatric body contouring surgery after weight loss: lessons learned from an obesity epidemic in the United States. Ann Plast Surg 77(Suppl 1):S53–S59CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Digital Imaging and 3D Modelling Laboratory, Department of Anatomy, Faculty of MedicineEge UniversityIzmirTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Faculty of MedicineEge UniversityIzmirTurkey

Personalised recommendations