Pelvic and lower extremity physiological cross-sectional areas: an MRI study of the living young and comparison to published research literature
- 386 Downloads
Morphological data pertaining to the pelvis and lower extremity muscles are increasingly being used in biomechanical modeling to compare healthy and pathological conditions. Very few data sets exist that encompass all of the muscles of the lower limb, allowing for comparisons between regions. The aims of this study were to (a) provide physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA) data for the pelvic, thigh, and leg muscles in young, healthy participants, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and (b) to compare these data with summarized PCSAs obtained from the literature.
Materials and methods
Six young and healthy volunteers participated and were scanned using 3 T MRI. PCSAs were calculated from volumetric segmentations obtained bilaterally of 28 muscles/muscle groups of the pelvis, thigh, and leg. These data were compared to published, summarized PCSA data derived from cadaveric, computed tomography, MRI and ultrasound studies.
The PCSA of the pelvis, thigh, and leg muscles tended to be 20–130% larger in males than in females, except for the gemelli which were 34% smaller in males, and semitendinosus and triceps surae which did not differ (<20% different). The dominant and the non-dominant sides showed similar and minutely different PCSA with less than 18% difference between sides. Comparison to other studies revealed wide ranges within, and large differences between, the cadaveric and imaging PCSA data. Comparison of the PCSA of this study and published literature revealed major differences in the iliopsoas, gluteus minimus, tensor fasciae latae, gemelli, obturator internus, biceps femoris, quadriceps femoris, and the deep leg flexor muscles.
These volume-derived PCSAs of the pelvic and lower limb muscles alongside the data synthesised from the literature may serve as a basis for comparative and biomechanical studies of the living and healthy young, and enable calculation of muscle forces. Comparison of the literature revealed large variations in PCSA from each of the different investigative modalities, hampering comparability between studies. Sample size, age, post-mortem changes of muscle tone, chemical fixation of cadaveric tissues, and the underlying physics of the imaging techniques may potentially influence PCSA calculations.
Keywords3 Telsa magnetic resonance imaging Leg Living young Lower extremity PCSA Pelvis Thigh Segmentation Volume
The authors would like to thank Heike Röder who helped to record the MRI data sets and Dagmar Kainmüller for her assistance to verify the results. We also greatly acknowledge Wolfgang Kummer and the Chihiro and Kiyoko Yokochi Fund for providing a travel scholarship to NH.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest related to this study.
- 10.Böhme J, Lingslebe U, Steinke H, Werner M, Slowik V, Josten C, Hammer N (2014) The extent of ligament injury and its influence on pelvic stability following type II anteroposterior compression pelvic injuries—a computer study to gain insight into open book trauma. J Orthop Res 32:873–879. doi: 10.1002/jor.22618 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Freiwalde A (1985) Incorporation of Active Elements into the Articulated Total Body Model. Pennsylvania State Univ University Park Dept of Industrial and Management Systems EngineeringGoogle Scholar
- 33.Kawakami Y, Akima H, Kubo K, Muraoka Y, Hasegawa H, Kouzaki M, Imai M, Suzuki Y, Gunji A, Kanehisa H, Fukunaga T (2001) Changes in muscle size, architecture, and neural activation after 20 days of bed rest with and without resistance exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 84:7–12. doi: 10.1007/s004210000330 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 36.Klein Horsman MD (2007) The Twente lower extremity model consistent dynamic simulation of the human locomotor apparatus (Het Twentse Onderste Extremiteiten Model: Consistente Dynamische Simulatie van het Menselijke Bewegingsapparataat). Universiteit TwenteGoogle Scholar
- 41.Lube J, Cotofana S, Bechmann I, Milani TL, Özkurtul O, Sakai T, Steinke H, Hammer N (2015) Reference data on muscle volumes of healthy human pelvis and lower extremity muscles: an in vivo magnetic resonance imaging feasibility study. Surg Radiol Anat. doi: 10.1007/s00276-015-1526-4 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 55.Pierrynowski MR (1982) A physiological model for the solution of individual muscle forces during normal human walking. Doctoral Thesis, Simon Fraser UniversityGoogle Scholar
- 59.Skorupska E, Keczmer P, Lochowski RM, Tomal P, Rychlik M, Samborski W (2016) Reliability of MR-based volumetric 3-D analysis of pelvic muscles among subjects with low back with leg pain and healthy volunteers. PLoS One 11:e0159587. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159587 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 61.Steinbruck A, Woiczinski M, Weber P, Muller PE, Jansson V, Schroder C (2014) Posterior cruciate ligament balancing in total knee arthroplasty: a numerical study with a dynamic force controlled knee model. Biomed Eng Online 13:91. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-13-91 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 69.Wickiewicz TL, Roy RR, Powell PL, Edgerton VR (1983) Muscle architecture of the human lower limb. Clin Orthop Relat Res:275–283Google Scholar