Lower pole anatomy and mid-renal-zone classification applied to flexible ureteroscopy: experimental study using human three-dimensional endocasts
- 205 Downloads
The aim of this study was to analyze the anatomy of the inferior pole collecting system and the mid-renal-zone classification in human endocasts applied to flexible ureteroscopy.
170 three-dimensional polyester resin endocasts of the kidney collecting system were obtained from 85 adult cadavers. We divided the endocasts into four groups: A1—kidney midzone (KM), drained by minor calices (mc) that are dependent on the superior or the inferior caliceal groups; A2—KM drained by crossed calices; B1—KM drained by a major caliceal group independent of both the superior and inferior groups; and B2—KM drained by mc entering directly into the renal pelvis. We studied the number of calices, the angle between the lower infundibulum and renal pelvis and the angle between the lower infundibulum and the inferior mc (LIICA). Means were statistically compared using ANOVA and the unpaired T test (p < 0.05).
We found 57 (33.53 %) endocasts of group A1; 23 (13.53 %) of group A2; 59 (34.71 %) of group B1; and 31 (18.23 %) of group B2. The inferior pole was drained by four or more calices in 84 cases (49.41 %), distributed into groups as follows: A1 = 35 cases (41.67 %); A2 = 18 (21.43 %); B1 = 22 (26.19 %); and B2 = 9 (10.71 %). Perpendicular mc were observed in 15 cases (8.82 %). We did not observe statistical differences between the LIICA in the groups studied.
Collector systems with kidney midzone drained by minor calices that are dependent on the superior or on the inferior caliceal groups presented at least two restrictive anatomical features. The mid-renal-zone classification was predictive of anatomical risk factors for lower pole ureteroscopy difficulties.
KeywordsFlexible ureteroscopy Kidney anatomy Lower pole anatomy Endocasts
This study was supported by grants from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq—Brazil) and the Rio de Janeiro State Research Foundation (FAPERJ).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest as statement in the manuscript.
- 4.Elbahnasy AM, Clayman RV, Shalhav AL et al (1998) Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy. J Endourol 159:676–682Google Scholar
- 11.Ito H, Kawahara T, Terao H, Ogawa T, Yao M, Kubota Y, Matsuzaki J (2013) Evaluation of preoperative measurement of stone surface area as a predictor of stone-free status after combined ureteroscopy with holmium lases lithotripsy: a single center experience. J Endourol 27:715–721. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0548 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Kumar PVS, Joshi HB, Keeley FX, Timoney AG (2000) An acute infundibulopelvic angle predicts failure of flexible ureteroscopy for lower calyceal stones. J Urol 163:339AGoogle Scholar
- 22.Sampaio FJB, D’Anunciação AL, Silva EC (1997) Comparative follow-up of patients with acute and obtuse infundibulum-pelvic angle submitted to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower caliceal stones: preliminary report and proposed study design. J Endourol 11:157–161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar