Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy

, Volume 37, Issue 9, pp 1099–1108

Anatomical considerations for implant placements in first maxillary molar extracted sites in East Asian patients

  • G. K. Ananda
  • Phrabhakaran Nambiar
  • Sunil Mutalik
  • Palasuntharam Shanmuhasuntharam
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

With the advent of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for maxillofacial imaging, there has been a paradigm shift from two dimensional panoramic radiography to three dimensional imaging. This study investigated the microanatomy of the maxillary permanent first molar socket and its relationship to the floor of the maxillary sinus, especially for immediate or early implant placement.

Materials and results

Sixty CBCT scans of 30 Malay and 30 Chinese subjects were selected from over 300 archived images. Ninety-five percent of the subjects had sinus floor extending anterior to the first molar, while 72 % had the floor dipping between the roots. Seventy-five percent of the patients had inter-radicular bone and almost 50 % had intrusion of root apices into the floor of the maxillary sinus. The dimensions of the socket were as follows: the mean width was 11.42 ± 0.86 mm; the mean length was 7.70 ± 0.56 mm; the mean height on the coronal plane was 6.48 ± 3.77 mm while on the sagittal plane it was 6.85 ± 3.67 mm.

Conclusions

Any implant length greater than the mean height of the socket (approximately 7 mm) has a fair chance of perforation into the maxillary sinus if placed without any additional adjunct procedures. In addition, 50 % of the apices opened into the maxillary sinus, thereby risking the creation of perforations or root displacements into the maxillary sinus during exodontia—mandating CBCT scanning prior to any surgical implant procedures.

Keywords

Early dental implants First maxillary molar CBCT East Asian patients Tooth loss Maxillary sinus 

References

  1. 1.
    Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR (1986) The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1:11–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bodi CF, Hamel L, Lerouxe IE, Basle MF, Chappa rei D (2005) Bone loss and teeth. Joint Bone Spine 72:215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chang SH, Lin CL, Lin YS, Hsue SS, Huang SR (2012) Biomechanical comparison of a single short and wide implant with monocortical or bicortical engagement in the atrophic posterior maxilla and a long implant in the augmented sinus. Int J Oral Max Impl 27:e102–e111Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deng F, Zhang H, Shao H, He Q, Zhang P (2010) A comparison of clinical outcomes for implants placed in fresh extraction sockets versus healed sites in periodontally compromised patients: a 1-year follow-up report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 25:1036–1040PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Rees J, Karasoulos D, Felice P, Alissa R, Worthington H, Coulthard P (2010) Effectiveness of sinus lift procedures for dental implant rehabilitation: a Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol 3:7–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Griffin TJ, Cheung WS (2004) The use of short, wide implants in posterior areas with reduced bone height: a retrospective investigation. J Prosthet Dent 92:139–144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guven O (1998) A clinical study on oroantral fistulae. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 26:267–271CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huttner EA, Machado DC, de Oliveira RB, Antunes AG, Hebling E (2009) Effects of human aging on periodontal tissues. Spec Care Dentist 29:149–155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ingle B, Baumgartner (eds) (2008) Ingle’s endodontics. Decker Inc, HamiltonGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jensen OT, Brownd C, Baer D (2006) Maxillary molar sinus floor intrusion at the time of dental extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64:1415–1419CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jun BC, Song SW, Park CS, Lee DH, Cho KJ, Cho JH (2005) The analysis of maxillary sinus aeration according to aging process; volume assessment by 3-dimensional reconstruction by high- resolutional CT scanning. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132:429–434CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jung YH, Cho BH (2012) Assessment of the relationship between the maxillary molars and adjacent structures using cone beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent 42(4):219–224. doi:10.5624/isd.2012.42.4.219 (Epub 2012 Dec 23)PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kloss FR, Gassner R (2006) Bone and aging: effects on the maxillofacial skeleton. Exp Gerontol 41:123–129CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kumar V (2009) Immediate implant placement. Int J Clin Implant Dent 1(2):5–9Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kwak HH, Park HD, Yoon HR, Kang MK, Koh KS, Kim HJ (2004) Topographic anatomy of the inferior wall of the maxillary sinus in Koreans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 33:382–388CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leskela HV, Risteli J, Niskanen S, Koivunen J, Ivaska KK, Lehenkari P (2003) Osteoblast recruitment from stem cells does not decrease by age at late adulthood. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 311:1008–1013CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mertens C, Meyer-Baumer A, Kappel H, Hoffmann J, Steveling HG (2012) Use of 8-mm and 9-mm implants in atrophic alveolar ridges: 10-year results. Int J Oral Max Impl 27:1501–1508Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nunes LS, Bornstein MM, Sendi P, Buser D (2013) Anatomical characteristics and dimensions of edentulous sites in the posterior maxillae of patients referred for implant therapy. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 33:337–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ok E, Güngör E, Colak M, Altunsoy M, Nur BG, Ağlarci OS (2014) Evaluation of the relationship between the maxillary posterior teeth and the sinus floor using cone-beam computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat 36(9):907–914. doi:10.1007/s00276-014-1317-3 (Epub 2014 May 30)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Quirynen M, Van Assche N, Botticelli D, Berglundh T (2007) How does the timing of implant placement to extraction affect outcome? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22(Suppl):203–223PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schropp L, Isidor F (2008) Timing of implant placement relative to tooth extraction. J Oral Rehabil 35(Suppl 1):33–43CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sharan A, Madjar D (2006) Correlation between maxillary sinus floor topography and related root position of posterior teeth using panoramic and cross-sectional computed tomography imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 102(3):375–381 (Epub 2006 Jun 8)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Srinivasan M, Vazquez L, Rieder P, Moraguez O, Bernard JP, Belser UC (2012) Efficacy and predictability of short dental implants (<8 mm): a critical appraisal of the recent literature. Int J Oral Max Implants 27:1429–1437Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vashishth D, Verborgt O, Divine G, Schaffler MB, Fyhrie DP (2000) Decline in osteocyte lacunar density in human cortical bone is associated with accumulation of microcracks with age. Bone 26:375–380CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vergara JA, Caffesse RG (2003) Immediate replacement of single upper posterior teeth:a report of cases. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 5:130–136CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Weinstein RS, Manolagas SC (2000) Apoptosis and osteoporosis. Am J Med 108:153–164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wong K (1996) Immediate implantation of endosseous dental implants in the posterior maxilla and anatomic advantages for this region: a case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 11:529–533Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. K. Ananda
    • 1
  • Phrabhakaran Nambiar
    • 2
  • Sunil Mutalik
    • 3
  • Palasuntharam Shanmuhasuntharam
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryEnche’ Besar Hajjah Khalsom HospitalKluangMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of Diagnostic and Integrated Dental Practice, Faculty of DentistryUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
  3. 3.School of DentistryInternational Medical UniversityBukit JalilMalaysia
  4. 4.Department of Oro-Maxillofacial Surgical and Medical Sciences, Faculty of DentistryUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia

Personalised recommendations