Advertisement

Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy

, Volume 37, Issue 6, pp 667–675 | Cite as

Classification of the renal vein variations: a study with multidetector computed tomography

  • Jingqi Zhu
  • Lei Zhang
  • Zhangwei Yang
  • Huang Zhou
  • Guangyu TangEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

To estimate the incidence, anatomical feature as well as type of the renal vein variation with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in an adult population.

Methods

A total of 1,452 patients who underwent MDCT angiography were retrospectively evaluated for the presence (number, length, origination, destination, branching pattern and course) of the renal vein variation. χ² test was used to compare the incidence of variations in left and right renal veins and the incidence of variations in each side renal vein between males and females.

Results

Renal vein variations were observed in 358 patients (24.7 %, 358/1,452), which included 103 patients (7.1 %, 103/1,452) with left renal vein (LRV) variations, 279 patients (19.2 %, 279/1,452) with right renal vein (RRV) variations and 24 patients (1.7 %, 24/1,452) with bilateral renal vein variations. The frequency of RRV variations was significantly higher than that of LRV variations (p < 0.05). No statistically significant correlation was found between variations of renal vein (LRV and RRV) and gender (p > 0.05). According to the morphology of the renal vein, we classified LRV variations into five types: type I, circumaortic LRV (2.1 %, 31/1,452); type II, retroaortic LRV (2.1 %, 30/1,452); type III, abnormal reflux (1.7 %, 24/1,452); type IV, late venous confluence of LRV (0.9 %, 13/1,452); type V, rare type (0.3 %, 5/1,452), and RRV variations into three types: type 1, additional renal vein (18.7 %, 271/1,452); type 2, abnormal reflux (0.4 %, 6/1,452); type 3, rare type (0.1 %, 2/1,452).

Conclusion

The renal vein variations are not unusual, particularly in the RRV. Anomalies of the LRV are more complex than those of the RRV. The renal vein anatomy can be well depicted by MDCT angiography. Our new classification of the renal vein variations will improve the recognition of the renal vein morphology preoperatively.

Keywords

Variation Renal vein X-ray computed tomography 

Notes

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Aljabri B, MacDonald PS, Satin R, Stein LS, Obrand DI, Steinmetz OK (2001) Incidence of major venous and renal anomalies relevant to aortoiliac surgery as demonstrated by computed tomography. Ann Vasc Surg 15(6):615–618PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ballesteros LE, Saldarriaga V, Ramirez LM (2014) Morphologic evaluation of the renal veins: a study with autopsy material from Colombian subjects. Rom J Morphol Embryol 55(1):77–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chai JW, Lee W, Yin YH, Jae HJ, Chung JW, Kim HH, Park JH (2008) CT angiography for living kidney donors: accuracy, cause of misinterpretation and prevalence of variation. Korean J Radiol 9(4):333–339PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deák PÁ, Doros A, Lovró Z, Toronyi E, Kovács JB, Végsö G, Piros L, Tóth S, Langer RM (2011) The significance of the circumaortic left renal vein and other venous variations in laparoscopic living donor nephrectomies. Transplant Proc 43(4):1230–1232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dilli A, Ayaz UY, Kaplanoğlu H, Saltas H, Hekimoglu B (2013) Evaluation of the left renal vein variations and inferior vena cava variations by means of helical computed tomography. Clin Imaging 37(3):530–535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dilli A, Ayaz UY, Karabacak OR, Tatar IG, Hekimoglu B (2012) Study of the left renal variations by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Surg Radiol Anat 34(3):267–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eid N, Ito Y, Otsuki Y (2013) The left inferior vena cava: a surgically important variant tributary of left renal vein. Surg Radiol Anat 35(5):455–456PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Janschek EC, Rothe AU, Hölzenbein TJ, Langer F, Brugger PC, Pokorny H, Domenig CM, Rasoul-Rockenschaub S, Mühlbacher F (2004) Anatomic basis of right renal vein extension for cadaveric kidney transplantation. Urology 63(4):660–664PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kang M, Kalra N, Sharma A, Kumar A, Minz M, Khandelwal N (2009) Single-phase 16-slice multidetector computed tomographic angiography in the evaluation of the venous system in potential laparoscopic renal donors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 33(5):710–714PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Karaman B, Koplay M, Ozturk E, Basekim CC, Ogul H, Mutlu H, Kizilkaya E, Kantarci M (2007) Retroaortic left renal vein: multidetector computed tomography angiography findings and its clinical importance. Acta Radiol 48(3):355–360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim JK, Park SY, Kim HJ, Kim CS, Ahn HJ, Ahn TY, Cho KS (2003) Living donor kidneys: usefulness of multi-detector row CT for comprehensive evaluation. Radiology 229(3):869–876PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim MK, Ku YM, Chun CW, Lee SL (2013) MDCT findings of right circumaortic renal vein with ectopic kidney. Korean J Radiol 14(5):786–788PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kyung DS, Lee JH, Shin DY, Kim DK, Choi IJ (2012) The double retro-aortic left renal vein. Anat Cell Biol 45(4):282–284PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lavy M, Martin L, Eouzan D, Turco C, Heyd B, Mantion G, Parratte B, Tatu L (2014) An unusual case of Y-shaped right renal vein. Surg Radiol Anat. doi: 10.1007/s00276-014-1280-z (Epub ahead of print)
  15. 15.
    Natsis K, Tsitouridis I, Totlis T, Levva S, Tsikaras P, Skandalakis P (2008) Proposal for classification of the circumaortic renal collar’s morphology. Am Surg 74(12):1190–1194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ogul H, Bozkurt M, Kantarci M (2009) Images in clinical urology. Why we did not use left side for this donor. Urology 74(1):67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Panagar AD, Subhash RL, Suresh BS, Nagaraj DN (2014) Circumaortic left renal vein-a rare case report. J Clin Diagn Res 8(3):111–112PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Patil UD, Ragavan A, Nadaraj, Murthy K, Shankar R, Bastani B, Ballal SH (2001) Helical CT angiography in evaluation of live kidney donors. Nephrol Dial Transplant 16(9):1900–1904PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Salder TW (2004) Langman’s medical embryology, 9th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 223–275Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Satyapal KS, Kalideen JM, Haffejee AA, Singh B, Robbs JV (1999) Left renal vein variations Surg Radiol Anat 21(1):77–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Suma HY, Roopa K (2011) Retro-aortic left renal vein—an anatomic variation description and review of literature. J Anat Embryol 116(3):144–147Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tore HG, Tatar I, Celik HH, Oto A, Aldur MM, Denk CC (2005) Two cases of inferior vena cava duplication with their CT findings and a review of the literature. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 64(1):55–58Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Trigaux JP, Vandroogenbroek S, De Wispelaere JF, Lacrosse M, Jamart J (1998) Congenital anomalies of the inferior vena cava and left renal vein: evaluation with spiral CT. J Vasc Interv Radiol 9(2):339–345PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yeşildağ A, Adanir E, Köroğlu M, Baykal B, Oyar O, Gülsoy UK (2004) Incidence of left renal vein anomalies in routine abdominal CT scans. Tani Girisim Radyol 10(2):140–143PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jingqi Zhu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lei Zhang
    • 2
  • Zhangwei Yang
    • 2
  • Huang Zhou
    • 2
  • Guangyu Tang
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyShanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tongji University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyEast Hospital, Tongji University School of MedicineShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations