Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy

, Volume 35, Issue 10, pp 925–934 | Cite as

A morphometric anatomical and comparative study of the foramen magnum region in a Greek population

  • K. Natsis
  • M. Piagkou
  • G. Skotsimara
  • G. Piagkos
  • P. Skandalakis
Original Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Background

The foramen magnum (FM), a complex area in craniocervical surgery, poses a challenge for neurosurgeons. The knowledge of the detailed anatomy of the FM, occipital condyles (OC) and variations of the region is crucial for the safety of vital structures. This study focuses on the FM and OC morphometry, highlights anatomical variability and investigates correlations between the parameters studied.

Materials and methods

One hundred and forty-three Greek adult dry skulls were examined using a digital sliding calliper (accuracy, 0.01 mm).

Results

Mean FM width and length were found 30.31 ± 2.79 and 35.53 ± 3.06 mm, respectively. The commonest FM shape was two semicircles (25.9 %), whereas the most unusual was irregular (0.7 %). The OC minimum width, maximum width and length were 5.71 ± 1.61, 13.09 ± 1.99 and 25.60 ± 2.91 mm on the right, and 6.25 ± 1.76, 13.01 ± 1.98 and 25.60 ± 2.70 mm on the left side. The commonest OC shape was S-like and the most unusual was ring, bilaterally. The mean anterior and posterior intercondylar distances were 19.30 ± 3.25 and 51.61 ± 5.01 mm, respectively. The OC protruded into the FM in 86.7 % of the skulls. Variations such as a third OC existed in 5.6 % and basilar processes in 2.8 %. Posterior condylar foramina were present in 75.5 %. The gender was correlated with FM width and length, OC length, bilaterally, anterior intercondylar distance (AID) and posterior intercondylar distance (PID). The OC protrusion and existence of posterior condylar foramina were correlated. Bilateral asymmetry for OC shape was statistically significant.

Conclusion

Our results provide useful information that will enable effective and reliable surgical intervention in the FM region with the maximum safety and widest possible exposure.

Keywords

Foramen magnum Occipital condyle Morphology Variation Craniocervical junction 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson PJ, Harkness WJ, Taylor W, Jones BM, Hayward RD (1997) Anomalous vein drainage in a case of non syndromic craniosynostosis. Childs Nerv Syst 13:97–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Avci E, Dagtekin A, Ozturk AH, Kara E, Ozturk NC, Uluc K, Acture E, Baskaya MK (2011) Anatomical variations of the foramen magnum, occipital condyle and jugular tubercle. Turk Neurosurg 21:181–190PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Babu RP, Sekhar LN, Wright DC (1994) Extreme lateral transcondylar approach: technical improvements and lessons learned. J Neurosurg 81:49–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barut N, Kale A, Suslu HT, Ozturk A, Bozbuga M, Sahinoglu K (2009) Evaluation of the bony landmarks in transcondylar approach. Br J Neurosurg 23:276–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berge JK, Bergman RA (2001) Variations in size and in symmetry of foramina of the human skull. Clin Anat 14:406–413PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boulton MR, Cusimano MD (2003) Foramen magnum meningiomas: concepts, classifications and nuances. Neurosurg Focus 14:10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bozbuğa M, Oztürk A, Bayraktar B, Ari Z, Sahinoğlu K, Polat G, Gürel I (1999) Surgical anatomy and morphometric analysis of the occipital condyles and foramen magnum. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn 75:329–334PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burdan F, Szumito J, Walocha J, Klepacz L, Madej B, Dworzanski W, Klepacz R, Dworzanska A, Czekajska-Chehab E, Drop A (2012) Morphology of the foramen magnum in young Eastern European adults. Folia Morphol 71:205–216Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Catalina- Herrera CJ (1987) Study of the anatomic metric values of the foramen magnum and its relation to sex. Acta Anat (Basel) 130:344–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chethan P, Prakash KG, Murlimanju BV, Prashanth KU, Prabhu LV, Saralaya VV, Krishnamurthy A, Somesh MS, Kumar CG (2012) Morphological analysis and morphometry of the foramen magnum: an anatomical investigation. Turk Neurosurg 22:416–419PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chu WC, Man GC, Lam WW, Yeung BH, Chau WW, Ng BK, Lam TP, Lee KM, Cheng JC (2007) A detailed morphologic and functional magnetic resonance imaging study of the craniocervical junction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:1667–1674Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Coll G, Arnaud E, Selek L, Brunelle F, Sainte-Rose C, Collet C, Di Rocco F (2012) The growth of the foramen magnum in Crouzon syndrome. Childs Nerv Syst 28:1525–1535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cross J, Coles A (2002) Suppliers of advanced neuro embolisation coils. ACNR 2:16–17Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Espinoza EG, Ayala CP, Ortega LB, Collipal EL, Silva HM (2011) Tomographic morphometry of the foramen magnum and its relation to sex and Mapuche ethnicity. Revista Anacem 5:28–31Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Franklin B, Gasco J, Rangel-Castilla L, Nauta HJ (2009) Apnea and macrocephaly-cutis marmorata telangiectatica congenita. Brain Dev 31:706–709PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Furtado SV, Thakre DJ, Venkatesh PK, Reddy K, Hegde AS (2010) Morphometric analysis of foramen magnum dimensions and intracranial volume in pediatric Chiari I malformation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 152:221–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gapert R, Black S, Last J (2009) Sex determination from the foramen magnum: discriminant function analysis in an eighteenth and nineteenth century British sample. Int J Legal Med 123:25–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gapert R, Black S, Last J (2009) Sex determination from the occipital condyle: discriminant function analysis in an eighteenth and nineteenth century British sample. Am J Phys Anthropol 138:384–394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Govsa F, Ozer MA, Celik S, Ozmutaf NM (2011) Three-dimensional anatomic landmarks of the foramen magnum for the craniovertebral junction. J Craniofac Surg 22:1073–1076PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gruber P, Henneberg M, Böni T, Rühli FJ (2009) Variability of human foramen magnum size. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 292:1713–1719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gunaya Y, Altinkokb M (2000) The value of the size of foramen magnum in sex determination. J Clin Forensic Med 7:147–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kanaan IU, Ellis M, Safi T, Al Kawi MZ, Coates R (1999) Craniocervical junction tuberculosis: a rare but dangerous disease. Surg Neurol 51:21–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kizilkanat ED, Boyan N, Soames R, Oguz O (2006) Morphometry of the hypoglossal canal, occipital condyle and foramen magnum. Neurosurgery Quarterly, James Cook University 16:121–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Manoel C, Prado FB, Caria PHF, Groppo FC (2009) Morphometric analysis of the foramen magnum in human skulls of Brazilian individuals: its relation to gender. Braz J Morphol Sci 26:104–108Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Murshed KA, Çiçekcibas i AE, Tuncer I (2003) Morphometric evaluation of the foramen magnum and variations in its shape: a study on computerized tomographic images of normal adults. Turk J Med Sci 33:301–306Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Muthukumar N, Swaminathan R, Venkatesh G, Bhanumathy SP (2005) A morphometric analysis of the foramen magnum region as it relates to the transcondylar approach. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 147:889–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Naderi S, Korsman E, Çitak G, Güvençer M, Arman M, Şenoğlu M, Tetik S, Arda MN (2004) Morphometric analysis of the human occipital condyle. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 107:191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Olivier G (1975) Biometry of the human occipital bone. J Anat 120:507–518PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Osunwoke EA, Oladipo GS, Gwunireama IU, Ngaokere JO (2012) Morphometric analysis of the foramen magnum and jugular foramen in adult skulls in southern Nigerian population. AM J Sci Ind Res 3:446–448Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ozcetin M, Arslan MT, Karapinar B (2012) An achondroplastic case with foramen magnum stenosis, hydrocephaly, cortical atrophy, respiratory failure and sympathetic dysfunction. Iran J Pediatr 22:121–124PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ozer MA, Celik S, Govsa F, Ulusoy MO (2011) Anatomical determination of a safe entry point for occipital condyle screw using three-dimensional landmarks. Eur Spine J 20:1510–1517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Paraskevas GK, Tsitsopoulos PP, Papaziogas B, Kitsoulis P, Spanidou S, Tsitsopoulos Ph (2009) Osseous variations of the hypoglossal canal area. Med Sci Monit 15:75–83Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Radhakrishna SK, Shivarama CH, Ramakrishna A, Bhagya B (2012) Morphometric analysis of foramen magnum for sex determination in South Indian population. NUJHS 2:20–22Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Raghavendra Babu YP, Kanchan T, Attiku Y, Dixit PN, Kotian MS (2012) Sex estimation from foramen magnum dimensions in an Indian population. J Forensic Leg Med 19:162–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Reich JB, Sierra J, Camp W, Zanzonico P, Deck MD, Plum F (1993) Magnetic resonance imaging measurements and clinical changes accompanying transtentorial and foramen magnum brain herniation. Ann Neurol 33:159–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Reynolds KK, Modaff P, Pauli RM (2001) Absence of correlation between infantile hypotonia and foramen magnum size in achondroplasia. Am J Med Genet 101:40–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rogers TL (2005) Determining the sex of human remains through cranial morphology. J Forensic Sci 50:493–500PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Routal RR, Pal GP, Bhagwat SS (1984) Metrical studies with sexual dimorphism in foramen magnum of human crania. J Anat Soc India 2:85–89Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sayee R, Janakiram S, Thomas IM (1987) Foramen magnum measurements of Crania from Karnataka. J Anat Soc India 36:87–89Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Seker A, Inoue K, Osawa S, Akakin A, Kilic T, Rhoton AL Jr (2010) Comparison of endoscopic transnasal and transoral approaches to the craniovertebral junction. World Neurosurg 74:583–602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sensening EC (1957) The development of the occipital and cervical segments and their associated structures in human embryos. Contrib Embryol 36:143–151Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Stratemeier PH, Jensen SR (1980) Partial regressive occipital vertebra. neuroradiology 19:47–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Suazo GJC, Russo PP, Zavando MDA, Smith RL (2009) Sexual dimorphism in the foramen magnum dimensions. Int J Morphol 27:21–23Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Surchev N (2008) Arterial relationships to the nerves and some rigid structures in the posterior cranial fossa. Clin Anat 21:492–500PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Tubbs RS, Griessenauer CJ, Loukas M, Shoja MM, Cohen-Gadol AA (2010) Morphometric analysis of the foramen magnum: an anatomic study. Neurosurgery 66:385–388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tubbs RS, Lingo PR, Mortazavi MM, Cohen-Gadol AA (2013) Hypoplastic occipital condyle and third occipital condyle: review of their dysembryology. Clin Anat. doi: 10.1002/ca.22205 Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Tubbs RS, Salter EG, Oakes WJ (2005) Duplication of the Occipital Condyles. Clin Anat 18:92–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ukoha U, Egwu OA, Okafor IJ, Anyabolu AE, Ndukwe GU, Okpala I (2011) Sexual dimorphism in the foramen magnum of Nigerian adult. Int J Biol Med Res 2:878–881Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Uthman AT, Al-Rawi NH, Al-Timimi JF (2011) Evaluation of foramen magnum in gender determination using helical CT scanning. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 0:1–6Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Uysal S, Gokharman D, Kacar M, Tuncbilek I, Kosa U (2005) Estimation of sex by 3D CT measurements of the foramen magnum. J Forensic Sci 50:1310–1314PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Valaskatzis E, Govender S (1996) Tuberculosis of the craniocervical junction: two case reports. Eur Spine J 5:140–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wanebo JE, Chinoine MR (2001) Quantitative analysis of the transcondylar approach to the foramen magnum. J Neurosurg 49:934–943Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Yalin CT, Bayrak IK, Danaci M, Incesu L (2003) Case report: rhizomelic chondrodysplasia punctata and foramen magnum stenosis in a newborn. Tani Girisim Radyol 9:100–103PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Natsis
    • 1
  • M. Piagkou
    • 2
  • G. Skotsimara
    • 2
  • G. Piagkos
    • 2
  • P. Skandalakis
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Anatomy, Medical SchoolAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.Department of Anatomy, Medical SchoolNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations