Advertisement

Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy

, Volume 34, Issue 10, pp 903–908 | Cite as

Morphological and functional asymmetry of the human recurrent laryngeal nerve

  • J. M. Prades
  • M. D. Dubois
  • J. M. Dumollard
  • L. Tordella
  • J. Rigail
  • A. P. Timoshenko
  • M. Peoc’h
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the current study was to analyze some parameters that are involved in nerve conduction in the right and left recurrent laryngeal nerves (RLNs) in humans. We have studied two morphological parameters such as the length of the two nerves, and the total intraperineural area (TIPA) from necropsies, and one functional parameter such as the latency of the thyroarytenoid muscle from operated patients.

Methods

The morphological parameters of six white female adult cadavers were analyzed. The RLNs were totally removed on both sides with the vagus nerve from their origin to the entrance in the larynx at the cricothyroid joint. The lengths were measured with the help of a digitalized caliper. Selected sections were obtained from each third of the RLNs for histological analysis. The TIPA was estimated at each selected level using digitized images of nerve sections and a manual micrometer. All the measurements were carried out by specialists in histology. The intraoperative vagal nerve stimulations were conducted using the NIM3 Medtronic® monitoring system (Medtronic Xomed Inc., Jacksonville, FL, USA) in ten adult patients without laryngeal or nervous disease during thyroid gland surgery. The evocated laryngeal electromyography was performed with the Medtronic bipolar needle electrode directly inserted into the thyroarytenoid muscle. The direct vagal nerve stimulation was achieved with the Medtronic stimulation from 0.5 to 1 mA. The latency of the thyroarytenoid muscle was recorded on the NIM-response monitor.

Results

The mean lengths of the left and right RLNs were, respectively, 136.6 and 75.0 mm with a mean difference of 61.6 mm (range 50–75 mm). The quantitative comparison of the TIPA between proximal segments of the left and right RLN showed no significant difference. The distal and proximal TIPA ratio demonstrated differences between the left and right RLN, respectively, 53.76 and 38.88 % without any statistical meaning. The comparison of the TIPA of the distal segments of the RLNs showed no significant difference. The intraoperative vagal nerve stimulation (0.5 and 1 mA) displayed a mean latency of the right and left thyroarytenoid muscle, respectively, of 3.55–3.68 and 5.90–5.98 ms with a mean difference of 2.35–2.30 ms (range 1.75–3.30 ms).

Conclusion

If length and latency asymmetry of the right and left RLNs in humans can be demonstrated, the synchronicity of the vocal folds requiring precise controlled variations within intrinsic laryngeal muscles needs further investigations.

Keywords

Recurrent laryngeal nerve Vagus nerve Morphometry Electromyography Latency humans 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Asgharpour E, Maranillo E, Sanudo J et al (2011) Recurrent laryngeal nerve landmarks revisited. Head Neck. doi: 10.1002/hed.21882
  2. 2.
    Atkins JP (1973) An electromyographic study of the recurrent laryngeal nerve conduction and its clinical applications. Laryngoscope 83:796–807PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blitzer A, Crumley RL, Dailey SH et al (2009) Recommendations of the neurolaryngology study group on laryngeal electromyography. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 140:782–793PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cernea CR, Hojaij FC, De Carlucci D et al (2009) Recurrent laryngeal nerve. A plexus rather than a nerve? Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 135:1098–1102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harrison DF (1981) Fibre size frequency in the recurrent laryngeal nerves of man and giraffe. Acta Otolaryngol 91:383–389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jotz GP, De Campos D, Rodrigues MF et al (2011) Histological asymmetry of the human recurrent laryngeal nerve. J Voice 25:8–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Krmpotic J (1959) Données anatomiques et histologiques relatives aux effecteurs laryngo-pharyngo-buccaux. Revue de Laryngologie-Otologie Rhinologie (Bordeaux) 80:829–848Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee MS, Lee UY, Lee JH et al (2009) Relative direction and position of recurrent laryngeal nerve for anatomical configuration. Surg Radiol Anat 31:649–665PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liebermann-Meffert D, Walbrun B, Hiebert C, Siewert J (1999) Recurrent and superior laryngeal nerves: a new look with implications for esophageal surgeons. Ann Thorac Surg 67:217–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Loucks TMJ, Poletto CJ, Simonyan K et al (2007) Human brain activation during phonation and exhalation: common volitional control for two upper airway functions. Neuro Image 36:131–143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Neumann HJ (2000) Intraoperative neuro physiological monitoring of recurrent laryngeal nerve and microdissection. Operations-technique procedures for reducing the risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve paresis (in German). Laryngo-Rhino-Otol 79:290–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Page C, Foulon P, Strunski V (2003) The inferior laryngeal nerve: surgical and anatomic considerations: report of 251 thyroidectomies. Surg Radiol Anat 25:188–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pascual-Font A, Merchan A, Maranillo E et al (2006) Morphometry of the recurrent laryngeal nerves of the rat (in Spanish). Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 57:435–440PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peters M (1992) Cerebral asymmetry for speech and the asymmetry in path lengths for the right and left recurrent nerves. Brain Lang 43:349–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Poletto CI, Verdun LP, Strominger R et al (2004) Correspondence between laryngeal vocal fold movement and muscle activity during speech and non speech gestures. J Appl Physiol 97:558–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Prades JM, Faye MB, Timoshenko AP et al (2006) Microsurgical anatomy of the intralaryngeal distribution of the inferior laryngeal nerve. Surg Radiol Anat 28:271–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pratap R, Farboud A, Patel H, Montgomery P (2009) Vagal nerve stimulator implantation: the otolaryngologist’s perspective. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266:1455–1459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Randolph GW, Dralle H, Abdullah H et al (2010) Electrophysiologic recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring during thyroid and parathyroid surgery: international standards guideline statement. Laryngoscope 121:S1–S16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Repice F, Coscarelli S, Rucci L (1990) Fibre size in the left and right recurrent laryngeal nerves in the man. Arch Ital Anat Embriol 95:229–236PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rodel RM, Olthoff A, Tergau F et al (2004) Human cortical motor representation of the larynx as assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Laryngoscope 114:918–922PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rustad WH, Morrison LF (1952) Revised anatomy of the recurrent laryngeal nerves. Surgical importance based on the dissection of 100 cadavers. Laryngoscope 62:237–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Scott AR, Chong PS, Hartnick CJ et al (2010) Spontaneous and evoked laryngeal electromyography of the thyroarytenoid muscles: a canine model for intra operative recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 119:54–63PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Silva AP, Jordao CE, Fazan VP (2007) Peripheral nerve morphometry: comparison between manual and semi-automated methods in the analysis of a small nerve. J Neurosci Methods 15:153–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sims HS, Yamashita T, Rhen K, Ludlow CL (1996) Assessing the clinical utility of the magnetic stimulator for measuring response latencies in the laryngeal muscles. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 114:761–767PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Steiss JE, Marshall AE (1988) Electromyographic evaluation of conduction time and velocity of the recurrent laryngeal nerves of clinically normal dogs. Am J Vet Res 49:1533–1536PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sun QJ, Chum JM, Bautista TG, Pilowsky PM, Berkowitz RG (2011) Neuronal mechanisms underlying the laryngeal adductor reflex. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 120:755–760PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Thumfart WF (1988) Electro diagnosis of laryngeal nerve disorders. Ear Nose Throat J 67:380–393PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tomasch J, Britton WA (1995) A fibre-analysis of the laryngeal nerve supply in man. Acta Anat 23:386–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tücker HM (1993) Physiology of the larynx. In: the larynx, 2nd edn. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 23–34Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Walker SF (1994) The possible role of asymmetric laryngeal innervations in language lateralization: points for and against. Brain Lang 46:482–489PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yalcin B, Tuggu H, Canturk N et al (2006) Laryngeal branching pattern of the inferior laryngeal nerve before entering the larynx. Surg Radiol Anat 28:339–342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yalcin B, Tunali S, Ozan H (2008) Extralaryngeal division of the recurrent laryngeal nerve: a new description for the inferior laryngeal nerve. Surg Radiol Anat 30:215–220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. M. Prades
    • 1
    • 3
  • M. D. Dubois
    • 3
  • J. M. Dumollard
    • 2
  • L. Tordella
    • 3
  • J. Rigail
    • 1
  • A. P. Timoshenko
    • 1
    • 3
  • M. Peoc’h
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Human AnatomyUniversity of Saint-EtienneSaint-EtienneFrance
  2. 2.Department of Human PathologyCHU NordSaint-EtienneFrance
  3. 3.Department of Anatomy and Otolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryCHU NordSaint-EtienneFrance

Personalised recommendations