Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk assessment of inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle by multidetector computed tomography in extractions of third molars

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to assess the reliability of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in determining the surgical risk of the inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle in extractions of third molars.

Methods

The sample comprised thirty-three individuals (63 third molars) who underwent preoperative evaluation by MDCT before extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. MDCT was used to determine the relationship between the roots of the third molars and the mandibular canal, and the course of the mandibular canal. Inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) exposure and the presence of hemorrhage were analyzed after removal of the teeth. IAN neurosensory deficit was recorded after 7 days. Clinical and MDCT findings were compared using Fisher’s exact test (P < 0.05).

Results

There was a statistically significant association between IAN exposure and the tomographic relationship between the roots of third molars and the mandibular canal (P = 0.015). Conventionally, all cases of IAN neurosensory deficit and hemorrhage occurred when the roots of the third molar presented in an at-risk relationship with the mandibular canal, however, this association was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). A statistically significant association was found between the lingual course of the mandibular canal and IAN exposure (P = 0.03).

Conclusions

MDCT is an effective tool for determination of the surgical risk to the inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle in extraction of mandibular third molars.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bell GW (2004) Use of dental panoramic tomographs to predict the relation between mandibular third molar teeth and the inferior alveolar. Radiological and surgical findings, and clinical outcome. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:21–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Blaeser BF, August MA, Donoff RB, Kaban LB, Dodson TB (2003) Panoramic radiography risk factors for inferior alveolar nerve injury after third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61:417–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blondeau F, Daniel NG (2010) Extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: postoperative complications and their risk factors. J Can Dent Assoc 73:325a–325e

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cheung LK, Leung YY, Chow LK, Wong MCM, Chan EKK, Fok YH (2010) Incidence of neurosensory deficits and recovery after lower third molar surgery: a prospective clinical study of 4338 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39:320–326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. de Melo Albert DG, Gomes ACA, Vasconcelos BCE, Silva EDO, Holanda GZ (2006) Comparison of orthopantomographs and conventional tomography images for assessing the relationship between impacted lower third molars and the mandibular canal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64:1030–1037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ghaeminia H, Meijer GJ, Soehardi A, Borstlap WA, Mulder J, Bergé SJ (2009) Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38:964–971

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghaeminia H, Meijer GJ, Soehardi A, Borstlap WA, Mulder J, Vlijmen OJ, Bergé SJ, Maal TJ (2011) The use of cone beam CT for the removal of wisdom teeth changes the surgical approach compared with panoramic radiography: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40:834–839

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gomes AC, Vasconcelos BGE, Silva EDO, Caldas AF, Neto IVP (2008) Sensitivity and specificity of pantomography to predict inferior alveolar nerve damage during extraction of impacted lower third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 66:256–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Haug RH, Perrott DH, Gonzalez ML, Talwar RM (2005) The American Association of oral and maxillofacial surgeons age-related third molar study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63:1106–1114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jerjes W, El-Maaytah M, Swinson B, Upile T, Thompson G, Gittelmon S, Baldwin D, Hadi H, Vourvachis M, Abizadeh N, Al Khawalde M, Hopper C (2006) Inferior alveolar nerve injury and surgical difficulty prediction in third molar surgery: the role of dental panoramic tomography. J Clin Dent 17:122–130

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jhamb A, Dolas R, Pandilwar P, Mohanty S (2009) Comparative efficacy of spiral computed tomography and orthopantomography in preoperative detection of relation of inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle to the impacted mandibular third molar. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:58–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Koizumi H, Sur J, Seki K, Nakajima K, Sano T, Okano T (2010) Effects of dose reduction on multi-detector computed tomographic images in evaluating the maxilla and mandible for pre-surgical implant planning: a cadaveric study. Clin Oral Investig 21:830–834

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lopes V, Mumenya R, Feinnmann C, Harris M (1995) Third molar surgery: an audit of the indications for surgery, post-operative complaints and patient satisfaction. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 33:33–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lübbers HT, Matthews F, Damerau G, Kruse AL, Obwegeser JA, Grätz KW, Eyrich GK (2011) Anatomy of impacted lower third molars evaluated by computerized tomography: is there an indication for 3-dimensional imaging? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 111:547–550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lysell L, Rohlin M (1988) A study of indications used for removal of the mandibular third molar. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 17:161–164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Maegawa H, Sano K, Kitagawa Y, Miyauchi K, Sekine J, Inokuchi T (2003) Preoperative assessment of the relationship between the mandibular third molar and the mandibular canal by axial computed tomography with coronal and sagittal reconstruction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 96:639–646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mahasantipiya PM, Savage NW, Monsour PAJ, Wilson RJ (2005) Narrowing of the dental canal in relation to the lower third molars. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 34:154–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Marciani RD (2007) Third molar removal: an overview of indications, imaging, evaluation, and assessment of risk. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 19:1–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nakamori K, Fujiwara K, Miyazaki A, Tomihara K, Tsuji M, Nakai M, Michifuri Y, Suzuki R, Komai K, Shimanishi M, Hiratsuka H (2008) Clinical assessment of the relationship between the third molar and the inferior alveolar canal using panoramic images and computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 66:2308–2313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nakayama K, Nonoyama M, Takaki Y, Kagawa T, Yuasa K, Izumi K, Ozeki S, Ikebe T (2009) Assessment of the relationship between impacted mandibular third molars and alveolar inferior nerve with dental 3-dimensional computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:2587–2591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Öhman A, Kivijarvi K, Blomback U, Flygare L (2006) Pre-operative radiographic evaluation of lower third molars with computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 35:30–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Park W, Choi JW, Kim JY, Kim BC, Kim HJ, Lee SH (2010) Cortical integrity of the inferior alveolar canal as a predictor of paresthesia after third-molar extraction. J Am Dent Assoc 141:271–278

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pogrel MA, Dorfman D, Fallah H (2009) The anatomic structure of the inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle in the third molar region. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:2452–2454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Poort LJ, van Neck JW, van der Wal KG (2009) Sensory testing of inferior alveolar nerve injuries: a review of methods used in prospective studies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:292–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rood JP, Shehab BAAN (1990) The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 28:20–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rydberg J, Liang Y, Teague SD (2003) Fundamentals of multichannel CT. Radiol Clin North Am 41:465–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Susarla S, Sidhu HK, Avery LL, Dodson TB (2010) Does computed tomographic assessment of inferior alveolar canal cortical integrity predict nerve exposure during third molar surgery? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:1296–1303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tantanapornkul W, Okochi K, Fujiwara Y, Yamashiro M, Maruoka Y, Ohbayashi N, Kurabayashi T (2007) A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 103:253–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tay AB, Go WS (2004) Effect of exposed inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle during surgical removal of impacted lower third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62:592–600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Valmaseda-Castellón E, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C (2001) Inferior alveolar nerve damage after lower third molar surgical extraction: a prospective study of 1117 surgical extractions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 92:377–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to CAPES for financial support, Delfin Clinic to perform the MDCT exams and Manoela Carrera for assistance in this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederico Sampaio Neves.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neves, F.S., de Almeida, S.M., Bóscolo, F.N. et al. Risk assessment of inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle by multidetector computed tomography in extractions of third molars. Surg Radiol Anat 34, 619–624 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-012-0961-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-012-0961-8

Keywords

Navigation