Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy

, Volume 31, Issue 8, pp 627–630 | Cite as

Reliability of Tuffier’s line evaluated on cadaver specimens

  • Gunther WindischEmail author
  • Heimo Ulz
  • Georg Feigl
Original Article


The aim was to evaluate the reliability of Tuffier’s line usually used as sole method to identify lumbar spinous process for a correct needle placement. Fifty-eight cadaver specimens were placed in a lateral position and a flexion in the lumbar spine performed to achieve a neutralization of the lumbar lordosis. The iliac crests were palpated and the lumbar spinous process marked on the intercristal line with a pin; all specimens were dissected and the marked spinous process documented. The center of the L4 spinous process was hit in 24 male (41.38%) and 10 female (17.24%) specimens. In only two female specimens (3.45%), the upper vertebra was reached; a pin placed in L3 was not found in male cadavers. The inferior edge of the L4 spinous process was hit in male 4 times (6.90%) and in female cadavers 12 times (20.69%). In the fifth lumbar spinous process, pins were placed five times in female cadavers (8.62%) and in only one male cadaveric specimen (3.72%). In conclusion, the accuracy of the focused lumbar spinous process depends on the right bedding and the orientation of the given landmarks, so Tuffier’s line stays the most important tool for anesthetists if palpation is performed very precisely.


Tuffier’s line Intercristal line Lumbar vertebral level Regional anesthesia 


  1. 1.
    Broadbent CR, Maxwell WB, Ferrie R, Wilson DJ, Gawne-Cain M, Russell R (2000) Ability of anaesthetists to identify a marked lumbar interspace. Anaesthesia 55:1122–1126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chakraverty R, Pynsent P, Isaacs K (2007) Which spinal levels are identified by palpation of the iliac crests and the posterior superior iliac spines? J Anat 210:232–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ellis H, Feldman S (1977) Anatomy for anaesthetists, 3rd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 122–124Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Furness G, Reilly MP, Kuchi S (2002) An evaluation of ultrasound imaging for identification of lumbar intervertebral level. Anaesthesia 57:277–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gordh T (1979) Spinal anaesthesia. In: Eriksson E (ed) Illustrated handbook in local anaesthesia. Llyod-Luke, London, pp 116–124Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hollinshead H (1964) Anatomy for surgeons, Vol .3, back and limbs. Holber Medical Division, Harper & Row, New York, pp 120–122Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jacoby GW (1895) Lumbar puncture of the subarachnoid space. N Y Med J 62:813–818Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kettani A, Tachinante R, Tazi A (2006) Evaluation of the iliac crest as anatomic landmark for spinal anaesthesia in pregnant women. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 25:501–504PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim JT, Bahk JH, Sung J (2003) Influence of age and sex on the position of the conus medullaris and Tuffier’s line in adults. Anesthesiology 99:1359–1363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    MacGibbon B, Farfan HF (1979) A radiologic survey of various configurations of the lumbar spine. Spine 4:258–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Render CA (1996) The reproducibility of the iliac crest as a marker of lumbar spine level. Anaesthesia 51:1070–1071PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shiraishi N, Matsumura G (2006) Establishing intercrestal line by posture: a radiographic evaluation. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn 82(4):139–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Santiago FR, Milena GL, Herrera RO, Romero PA, Plazas PG (2001) Morphometry of the lower lumbar vertebrae in patients with and without low back pain. Eur Spine J 10:228–233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Snell R, Katz J (1988) Clinical anatomy for anaesthesiologists, 1st edn. Appleton, Norwalk, pp 134–135Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Snider KT, Kribs JW, Snider EJ, Degenhardt BF, Bukowski A, Johnson JC (2008) Reliability of Tuffier’s line as an anatomic landmark. Spine 33:161–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thiel W (1992) The preservation of the whole corpse with natural color. Ann Anat 174:185–195PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tuffier T (1900) Anesthésie médullaire chirurgicale par injection sous-arachnoidienne lombaire de cocaïne, technique et résultats. Sem Medicale 20:167–169Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van Gessel EF, Forster A, Gamulin Z (1993) Continuous spinal anesthesia: where do spinal catheters go? Anesth Analg 76:1004–1007PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Williams PL (1999) Gray’s anatomy, 38th edn. Churchill Livingstone, London, pp 526–528Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of AnatomyMedical University GrazGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations