Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy

, Volume 31, Issue 5, pp 369–377

Peritoneal surface area: measurements of 40 structures covered by peritoneum: correlation between total peritoneal surface area and the surface calculated by formulas

  • Alfonso M. Albanese
  • Eduardo F. Albanese
  • Jorge H. Miño
  • Elena Gómez
  • Marta Gómez
  • Marcos Zandomeni
  • Alicia B. Merlo
Original Article

Abstract

Background

We have not found studies that have measured the peritoneal surface area of each of the walls, organs, mesos, omenta, and peritoneal ligaments in a group of non-eviscerated human cadavers.

Objectives

The objectives of this study were to obtain in fixed non-eviscerated cadavers: (1) the surface values of walls, organs, mesos, omenta, and peritoneal ligaments of each one and all the areas mentioned in the anatomy bibliography and their contribution to supra- and infra-colic portions, visceral and parietal portions of the supra- and infra-colic portions and the total peritoneal surface area, and (2) the relationship between the peritoneal surface values by direct measurement and the values obtained applying the formulas usually used in clinical practice to obtain body surface area.

Methods

The peritoneal surface area of ten female human bodies presenting no abdominal pathologies were measured. They were fixed in 5% formaldehyde solution without the use of perfusion pumps and non-eviscerated, thus maintaining all structures intact. Cellophane was placed directly in situ onto all organs, mesos, omenta, ligaments and parietal walls. Digital imaging was obtained by scanning the models. A length reference was included and the surface was determined by the Scion Image program for Windows.

Results

This paper provides for the first time data on each one and all the areas covered by the peritoneum. The total peritoneal surface area was (mean ± SE) 14,323.62 ± 824.37 cm2. The two greater surfaces of peritoneum (39.21% of the total surface) correspond to the jejunum–ileum and its mesentery. The diaphragmatic peritoneum represented the greater area of parietal peritoneum. The supracolic surface was 4,487.46 ± 196.21 cm2 (31.79 ± 1.50%) and the infracolic one of 9,836.16 ± 732.67 cm2 (68.21 ± 1.50%). An interesting result of this work is that the surface of the parietal peritoneum in the supracolic abdomen (1,786.67 ± 92.58 cm2, 68.56%) is more than twice that of the infracolic region (756.62 ± 55.91 cm2, 31.44%). The visceral peritoneal surface (81.89 ± 0.99% of the total) was much higher than that of the parietal peritoneum (18.11 ± 0.99%). This difference is 12 times bigger in the infracolic abdomen. The peritoneal surface area measured in this study in non-eviscerated cadavers represents more than 96% of the one estimated by the above-mentioned formulas.

Conclusion

The values shown in this paper would provide non-existing information for basic anatomy, and would contribute either to the study of pathologies involving the peritoneum or to their diagnosis and therapies.

Keywords

Peritoneal surface area Supracolic–infracolic peritoneum Visceral–parietal peritoneum Body surface areas formulas Peritoneal dialysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Boyd E (1935) The growth of the surface area of the human body. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. In: Current JD (1998) A linear equation for estimating the body surface area in infants and children. The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology, vol 2 no 2Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Breborowicz A, Rodela H, Knapowski J, Oreopoulos DG (1989) Permeability of different parts of the peritoneal mesothelium to solutes: an in vitro study. Perit Dial Int 9(2):135–141PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Caimi F, Rovere G, Philippson M, Battaglia E (1991) Contribution of peritoneography combined with computerized tomography, in the assessment of abdominal complications in patients undergoing continuous peritoneal dialysis. Radiol Med (Torino) 81(5):656–659Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carmignani CP, Sugarbaker TA, Bromley CM, Sugarbaker PH (2003) Intraperitoneal cancer dissemination: mechanisms of the patterns of spread. Cancer Metastasis Rev 22(4):465–472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chagnac A, Herskovitz P, Weinstein T, Elyashiv S, Hirsh J, Hammel I, Gafter U (1999) The peritoneal membrane in peritoneal dialysis patients estimation of its functional surface area by applying stereologic methods to computerized tomography scans. J Am Soc Nephrol 10:342–346PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    DuBois D, DuBois EF (1916) A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. Arch Int Med 17:863–871Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elsayes KM, Staveteig PT, Narra VR, Leyendecker JR, Lewis JS Jr, Brown JJ (2006) MRI of the peritoneum: spectrum of abnormalities. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(5):1368–1379PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Esperanca MJ, Collins DL (1966) Peritoneal dialysis efficiency in relation to body weight. J Pediatr Surg 1(2):162–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fischbach M, Michallat AC, Zollner G, Dheu C, Barthelmebs M, Helwig JJ, Loichot C, Escande B, Schmitt KP, Schaefer F, Haraldsson B, Jacques C (2005) Measurement by magnetic resonance imaging of the peritoneal membrane in contact with dialysate in rats. Adv Perit Dial 21:17–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Flessner MF, Lofthouse J, Williams A (2001) Increasing peritoneal contact area during dialysis improves mass transfer. J Am Soc Nephrol 12(10):2139–2145PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Garofalo A, Valle M, Garcia J, Sugarbaker PH (2006) Laparoscopic intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy for palliation of debilitating malignant ascites. Eur J Surg Oncol 32(6):682–685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gehan EA, George SL (1970) Estimation of human body surface area from height and weight. Cancer Chemother Rep 54:225–235PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gotloib L, Gotloib LC, Khrizman V (2007) The use of peritoneal mesothelium as a potential source of adult stem cells. Int J Artif Organs 30(6):501–512PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Williams PL (1995) Gray’s anatomy. The anatomical basis of medicine and surgery, 38th edn. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 1734–1746Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Haycock GB, Schwartz GJ, Wisotsky DH (1978) Geometric method for measuring body surface area: a height weight formula validated in infants, children and adults. J Pediatr 93(1):62–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kaneko K, Hamada C, Tomino Y (2007) Peritoneal fibrosis intervention. Perit Dial Int 27(Suppl 2):S82–S86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kruschewski M, Al-Fakhri N, Runkel N, Buhr HJ (2000) The insertion of the lesser and greater gastric omenta and its significance for the T classification of gastric carcinomas (UICC). Surg Radiol Anat 22(3–4):135–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lamme B, Mahler CW, van Ruler O, Gouma DJ, Reitsma JB, Boermeester MA (2006) Clinical predictors of ongoing infection in secondary peritonitis: systematic review. World J Surg 30(12):2170–2181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lardennois G, Okinczyc J (1913) La typhlosigmoidostömie en Y dans le traitment des coutes rebelles et de la stase du gros intestin. Bull Mem Soc Anat Paris 39:858–872Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mosteller RD (1987) Simplified calculation of body surface area. N Engl J Med 317(17):1098PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ombredanne L. (1900) Les lames vasculaires dans l’abdomen, le bassin et le perinée. Th. ParisGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pawlaczyk K, Kuzlan M, Wieczorowska-Tobis K, Pawlik-Juzków H, Breborowicz A, Knapowski J, Oreopoulos DG (1996) Species-dependent topography of the peritoneum. Adv Perit Dial 12:3–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Poirier P, Charpy A (1905) Traité d’Anatomie Humaine Tomo 4 - fascicule3- (por Pierre Frédet). Deuxiéme Edition. Masson et Cie Editeurs, Paris, pp 885–1122Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Prischl FC, Muhr T, Seiringer EM, Funk S, Kronabethleitner G, Wallner M, Artmann W, Kramar R (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging of the peritoneal cavity among peritoneal dialysis patients, using the dialysate as “contrast medium”. J Am Soc Nephrol 13(1):197–203PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rubin J, Clawson M, Planch A (1988) Measurements of peritoneal surface area in man and rat. Am J Med Sci 295(5):453–458PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Testut L, Latarjet A (1975) Anatomía Humana. Tomo IV. Salvat Editores. SA. 9ª edn. Barcelona, Spain, pp 741–839Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Twardowski ZJ (2006) Pathophysiology of peritoneal transport. Contrib Nephrol 150:13–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yan TD, Padang R, Morris DL (2006) Longterm results and prognostic indicators after cryotherapy and hepatic arterial chemotherapy with or without resection for colorectal liver metastases in 224 patients: longterm survival can be achieved in patients with multiple bilateral liver metastases. J Am Coll Surg 202(1):100–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yavuz K, Erden A, Ates K, Erden I (2005) MR peritoneography in complications of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Abdom Imaging 30(3):361–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zakaria ER, Carlsson O, Rippe B (1997) Limitation of small-solute exchange across the visceral peritoneum: effects of vibration. Perit Dial Int 17:72–79Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alfonso M. Albanese
    • 1
  • Eduardo F. Albanese
    • 1
  • Jorge H. Miño
    • 1
  • Elena Gómez
    • 1
  • Marta Gómez
    • 1
  • Marcos Zandomeni
    • 1
  • Alicia B. Merlo
    • 1
  1. 1.Cátedra de Anatomía, Facultad de MedicinaUniversidad del SalvadorCiudad Autónoma de Buenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations