Advertisement

Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 183–189 | Cite as

Gender differences in glenoid anatomy: an anatomic study

  • Andrea MerrillEmail author
  • Kara Guzman
  • Suzanne L. Miller
Original Article

Abstract

Gender differences in glenoid anatomy have not been well studied in the current literature. Previous literature demonstrates a mismatch between glenoid anatomy and glenoid implants for shoulder replacements. This may have clinical implications in that glenoid loosening after shoulder arthroplasty has been cited as a frequent cause of poor performance of shoulder implants, and perhaps the most common indication for revision. The purpose of this study was to determine any gender differences in the size and overall shape of the glenoid. Eleven measurements were taken of 363 human scapular bone specimens (equal proportions of females to males and blacks to whites). Glenoid height and width, glenoid notch location, and depth were measured for each specimen using calipers. In addition, the authors developed a classification system to describe anterior glenoid notch morphology. There was a significant difference between female and male specimens for each dimension measured (P < 0.05). Height to width ratios were also significantly different comparing men to women (P < 0.05). These differences resulted in a rounder male glenoid and more oval female glenoid. Our results showed that 80.4% of females had an anterior glenoid notch compared to only 57.6% of males. There was a significant difference between female and male specimens in the location of the anterior glenoid notch: 36.7% from the top of the glenoid in female specimens, and 28.9% in males (P < 0.0001). The clear difference between male and female glenoid anatomy may be important in various shoulder surgeries.

Keywords

Glenoid Shoulder joint Shoulder joint/anatomy and histology Gender differences Anthropometry 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Cleveland Museum of Natural History for allowing us access to the Hamann-Todd Osteological Collection and Stryker Orthopaedics for their support of this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Bicknell RT, Patterson S, King G, Chess D, Johnson J (2007) Glenoid vault endosteal dimensions: an anthropometric study with special interest in implant design. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16:96S–101SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Checroun AJ, Hawkins C, Kummer FJ, Zuckerman JD (2002) Fit of current glenoid component designs: an anatomic cadaver study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:614–617PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Churchill RS, Brems JJ, Kotschi H (2001) Glenoid size, inclination, and version: an anatomic study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10:327–332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fenlin JM, Ramsey ML, Allardyce TJ, Frieman BG (1994) Modular total shoulder replacement. Clin Orthop Rel Res 307:37–46Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Franklin JL, Barrett WP, Jackins SE, Matsen FA (1988) Glenoid loosening in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 3:39–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hawkins RJ, Greis PE, Bonutti PM (1999) Treatment of symptomatic glenoid loosening following unconstrained shoulder arthroplasty. Orthopedics 22:229–234PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ianotti JP, Gabriel JP, Schneck SL, Evans BG, Misra S (1992) The normal glenohumeral relationships: an anatomical study of one hundred and forty shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:491–500Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Neer CSII, Kirby RM (1982) Revision of humeral head and total shoulder arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Rel Res 170:189–195Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Prescher A, Klumpen T (1997) The glenoid notch and its relation to the shape of the glenoid cavity of the scapula. J Anat 190:457–460PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Rowland CM (1998) Neer hemiarthroplasty and Neer total shoulder arthroplasty in patients fifty years old or less. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:464–473PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Torchia ME, Cofield RH, Settergren CR (1997) Total shoulder arthroplasty with the Neer prosthesis: long-term results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 6:495–505PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wirth MA, Rockwood CA (1994) Complications of shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res 307:47–69Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea Merrill
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kara Guzman
    • 1
  • Suzanne L. Miller
    • 1
  1. 1.New England Baptist HospitalBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations