Advertisement

Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 403–408 | Cite as

A supraomohyoidal plexus block designed to avoid complications

  • G. Feigl
  • A. Fuchs
  • M. Gries
  • Q. H. Hogan
  • B. Weninger
  • W. Rosmarin
Original Article

Abstract

Interscalene blocks of the brachial plexus are used for surgery of the shoulder and are frequently associated with complications such as temporary phrenic block, Horner syndrome or hematoma. To minimize the risk of these complications, we developed an approach that avoids medially directed needle advancement and favors spread to lateral regions only: the supraomohyoidal block. We tested this procedure in 11 cadavers fixed by Thiel’s method. The insertion site is at the lateral margin of the sternocleidomastoid muscle at the level of the cricoid cartilage. The needle is inserted in the axis of the plexus with an angle of approximately 35° to the skin, and advanced in lateral and caudal direction. Distribution of solution was determined in ten cadavers after bilateral injection of colored solution (20 and 30 ml) and followed by dissection. In an eleventh cadaver, computerized tomography and 3D reconstruction after radio contrast injection was performed. In additional five cadavers we performed Winnie’s technique with bilateral injection (20 and 30 ml).Concerning the supraomohyoidal block the injection mass reached the infraclavicular region surrounded all trunks of the brachial plexus in the supraclavicular region and the suprascapular nerve in all cases. The solution did not spread medially beyond the lateral margin of the anterior scalene muscle into the scalenovertebral triangle. Therefore, phrenic nerve, stellate ganglion, laryngeal nerve nor the vertebral artery were exposed to the injected solution. Distribution was comparable with the use of 20 and 30 ml of solution. Injections on five cadavers performing the interscalene block of Winnie resulted in an extended spread medially to the anterior scalene muscle.We conclude that our method may be a preferred approach due to its safety, because no structures out of interest were reached. Solution of 20 ml is suggested to be enough for a successful block.

Keywords

Supraomohyoidal plexus block Supraclavicular plexus blocks Brachial plexus block Anesthetic technique Anesthesiology 

References

  1. 1.
    Benumof JL (2000) Permanent loss of cervical spinal chord function associated with interscalene block performed under general anesthesia. Anesthesiology 93:1541–1544PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bittar DA (2001) Attempted interscalene block procedures. Anesthesiology 95:1303–1304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Borgeat A, Ekatodramis G (2002) Anaesthesia for shoulder surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 16:211–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Borgeat A, Dullenkopf A, Ekatodramis G, Nagy L (2003) Evaluation of the lateral modified approach for continuous interscalene block after shoulder surgery. Anesthesiology 99(2):436–442PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Casati A, Fanelli G, Cedrati V, Berti M, Aldegheri G, Torri G (1999) Pulmonary function changes after interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia with 0.5% and 0.75% ropivacaine: a double-blinded comparison with 2% mepivacaine. Anesth Analg 88:587–592PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dutton RP, Eckhardt WF III, Sunder N (1994) Total spinal anesthesia as a complication of interscalene block of brachial plexus. Anesthesiology 80:939–941PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hempel V (1999) Anästhesie des Plexus brachialis. Anaesthesist 48:341–355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kilka HG, Geiger P, Mehrkens HH (1995) Die infraclaviculäre Blockade des Plexus brachialis. Anaesthesist 44:339–344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kulenkampff D (1911) Die Anästhesierung des Plexus brachialis. Zentralblatt Chir 38:1337Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kumar A, Battit GE, Froese AB, Long MC (1971) Bilateral cervical and thoracic epidural blockade complicating interscalene brachial plexus block: report of two cases. Anesthesiology 35(6):650–652PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Long TR, Wass CT, Burkle CM. (2002) Perioperative interscalene blockade: an overview of its history and current clinical use. J Clin Anesth 14(7):546–556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Meier G, Bauereis CH, Heinrich CH (1997) Der interskalenäre Plexuskatheter zur Anästhesie und postoperative Schmerztherapie. Anaesthesist 46:715–719PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meier G, Bauereis CH, Maurer H, Meier Th (2001) Interskalenäre Plexusblockade. Anaesthesist 50:333–341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moorthy SS, Schmidt SI, Dierdorf SF, Rosenfeld SH, Anagnostou JM. (1991) A supraclavicular lateral paravascular approach for brachial plexus regional anesthesia. Anesth Analg 73(2):238–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pham-Dang C, Gunst JP, Gouin F, Poirier P, Touchais S, Meunier JF, Kick O, Drouet AC, Bourreli B, Pinaud M (1997) A novel supraclavicular approach to brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg 85:111–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sala-Blanch X, Làzaro JR, Correa J, Gomez- Fernandez M (1999) Phrenic nerve blocks caused by interscalene brachial plexus block: effects of digital pressure and low volume of local anesthetics. Reg Anesth Pain Med 24(3):231–235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Scammell SJ (1979) Inadvertent epidural anesthesia as a complication of interscalene brachial plexus block. Anaesth Intensive Care 7:56–57PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Seltzer JL (1977) Hoarseness and Horner’s syndrome after interscalene brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg 56:585–586PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thiel W (1992a) Die Konservierung ganzer Leichen in natürlichen Farben. Annals Anat 174:185–195Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tuominen MK, Peretti P, Rosenberg PH (1991) Unintentional arterial catheterization and bupivacaine toxicity with continuous interscalene brachial plexus block. Anesthesiology 75:356–358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Umfahrer P, Santler G, Preidler K, Weiglein A (2002) Anatomische und magnetresonaztomographische Untersuchung einer neuen Technik der Leitungsanästhesie des Nervus mandibularis. Stomatologie 99(7):169–180Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Urmey WF, Talts KH, Sharrock NE (1991) One hundred percent incidence of hemi diaphragmatic paresis associated with interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia as diagnosed by ultrasonography. Anesth Analg 72:498–503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vester-Andersen T, Christiansen C, Hansen A, Sörensen M, Meister C (1981) Interscalene brachial plexus block: area of analgesia, complications and blood concentrations of local anesthetics. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 25:81–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Winnie A (1970) Interscalene brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg 49:455–466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Feigl
    • 1
    • 4
  • A. Fuchs
    • 2
  • M. Gries
    • 2
  • Q. H. Hogan
    • 3
  • B. Weninger
    • 1
  • W. Rosmarin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnatomyMedical University GrazGrazAustria
  2. 2.Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care MedicineMedical University of GrazGrazAustria
  3. 3.Department of Anesthesiology Medical College of WisconsinMilwaukeeUSA
  4. 4.Division of AnatomyCMU University of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations